Does anyone watch the Rachel Ray show???

(I don't)

But might be on it

I think it was Herpes Simplex that coined the phrase "half pig half twelve year old" ...

How'd you manage to get on that show? She can't cook and needs a good kicking but let me know which episode so I can DVR it.

What did you do to deserve that?

Speaking of cooking shows, the missus knows someone who'll be on the 23rd May of the Ina Garden Barefoot Contessa show.

She does chocolates and is pretty amazing, she gave Ina a sample at a book signing last year and then Ina bought $400 worth of holiday chocolates and invited her on her show...she also got invited to Ophra but never actually made it on the show there.

And back to tele, Tudors, back for a 4th...worth watching? We kind of gave up by the second series, but the library has that series so could always check it out if it's worth it.

My nephew was on Martha Stewart ... on a pie contest show.

Oh dear.


They were filming at a famous hot dog stand near by and I happened to be driving by and saw the Co-owners out side and stopped by for lunch, they've been on pretty much every news show chat show that there is and most food shows, feature in a lot of books etc etc etc

I don't know when it is on, but I can avoid seeing it now if she's a cringefest!

That stupid boy that plays Henry makes me want to hurt people.




I'm still really enjoying "Justified".

I've decided Timothy Olyphant is going on "the list"

She has turned out to be quite an abomination. She started out with a show about how to eat on a budget when you travel - which wasn't half bad. Then she got her cooking show and that's when it became painfully obvious that she couldn't cook - at least to people that actually like to cook. Then she sold her soul to the devil and became a franchise.

Jonathan Rhys Meyers can hurt me anytime.

Bob...what were you thinking?? The second series was brilliant.

Just lost interest tbh...

I know what you mean Bob. The nudity content went way down after the first series following a very promising start. This seems to be commonplace with a lot of these cable mini-series where they try to hook you with a high-flesh content in the beginning, only to scale it back as the show wears on.

When will they get the message we're not watching this crap for the acting or historical accuracy?

They're fooling no-one.

I was,

You've seen one rumpy pumpy, you've seen 'em all. Although the torture scenes were a bit eye opening.

The tarmac driveways, victorian horse carriages, concrete bollards, modern radiators and pretty-boy portrayal of the King etc, I can live with. However, the tampering with historical events is another matter that's a plain old insult.

Just imagine the outcry in the US if there was a show about the American Revolution and a scene with Washington crossing the Delaware, only to be sidetracked in a cabin for a bit of threesome nookie? I don't think it would go down to well.

You're not fooling me for a second Cindy.

I thought physically Keith Michell was the best Henry.

I've just watched last week's episode of Criminal Minds...the one set in San Fran with Forest Whittaker. I'm betting they're going to make a spin off series.

Anyone catch Glee?

It's a bit of a guilty pleasure, not seen this episode yet, got it recorded for tomorrow.