![]() |
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by civilservant
(Post 11144127)
You already did!
Since you have no proof, and we don't really believe you, I think alleged is a perfectly reasonable word to use. |
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by markonline1
(Post 11140113)
How long ago was this? I accept things are different in the US than the UK, but in the UK every bird strike (and every suspected bird strike) has to be reported to the CAA. I can't imagine it's too much different here. More importantly, what bloomin airline were you flying for where something like that could happen yet you didn't make any sort of mention of it??
Had more then one delay and cancelled flight because maintenance wasn't available in a reasonable time to keep the flight on the schedule. (I worked in a field station so we only had overnight maintenance, any issues during the day either resulted in a cancelled flight, or a very delayed flight while we waited for maintenance to come in from home as they only worked 6pm to 6am) |
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by The Quiet Man
(Post 11144120)
"alleged"? I don't want to talk about me or my life story...
737-100 |
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 11144154)
The airline I worked for, pilots were required to report all bird strikes and maintenance was required to do an inspection before the plane could go back into service.
Forget about that guys- There are probably hundreds of bird strikes a day- You act like i'm making some kind of fantastical claims? |
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 11144161)
Lucky you, so few 100's were made not many got to fly it.
There still flying...100's of them...With the old engines, it is one of the most popular aircraft of all times |
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by The Quiet Man
(Post 11144182)
?
There still flying...100's of them...With the old engines, it is one of the most popular aircraft of all times The last -100 was retired in 1997. |
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by The Quiet Man
(Post 11144182)
..... There still flying...100's of them...With the old engines, it is one of the most popular aircraft of all times
|
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 11144199)
That's the -200.
The last -100 was retired in 1997. Retired from what? An Airline? They are everwhere-I saw one the other day..Furthermore I said that happened in 93. Listen, don't believe me, I did'nt happen, its too far fetched to believe... You said some ridiculous things about the Southwest incident and I called you on it... Lets move on |
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11144203)
No. Get your facts straight, only 30 were made, of which the last was delivered in October 1969.
Whata want, pictures? |
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by The Quiet Man
(Post 11144208)
Retired from what? An Airline? They are everwhere-I saw one the other day..Furthermore I said that happened in 93.
Listen, don't believe me, I did'nt happen, its too far fetched to believe... You said some ridiculous things about the Southwest incident and I called you on it... Lets move on The -200 series was produced in great numbers and had the same old engines. That was in service well into the 2000s. Not sure if it still is anymore. I'm less concerned about the validity of your sorry than I am with being pedantic about aircraft variants. |
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by The Quiet Man
(Post 11144216)
If it has the old engines, I call it a 100 .....
|
Re: Planespotting
Gotta love those old low-bypass turbofans. The CFMs on retrofitted DC-8s (most of UPSs fleet when it was still flying them) were my particular favourites.
|
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by civilservant
(Post 11144233)
Gotta love those old low-bypass turbofans. The CFMs on retrofitted DC-8s (most of UPSs fleet when it was still flying them) were my particular favourites.
|
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 11144224)
NASA. The -100 wasn't in service with airlines at the time.
The -200 series was produced in great numbers and had the same old engines. That was in service well into the 2000s. Not sure if it still is anymore. I'm less concerned about the validity of your sorry than I am with being pedantic about aircraft variants. Congratulations...You know more about some planes than the pilots that fly them..My father retired as a 777 captain and my brother flys A-340's (correct me if i'm wrong) for Sri Lanka Airlines- My eyes glaze over when he starts talking about it.. A-340 I think..4 engines, Columbo to London twice a week? |
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by civilservant
(Post 11144233)
Gotta love those old low-bypass turbofans. .
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 8:16 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.