Re: Palin the Saviour
 

ROFL! Damn! You nearly got Karma for that...

...but you wouldn't like it - mine's nasty Liberal karma that doesn't go to Church.

Re: Palin the Saviour
 

Depends upon whose point I suppose.

As an animal lover, I'd worry more about if the animals suffered. And knowing quite a few hunters, I wouldn't have classified them as psychos.

Re: Palin the Saviour
 

So there's a "thou shall not kill" commandment.

The bible is littered with murder, animal sacrifice and other examples of religious hypocracy.

for all the first-born are mine; on the day that I slew all the first-born in the land of Egypt, I consecrated for my own all the first-born in Israel, both of man and of beast; they shall be mine: I am the LORD." (Num. 3:11-13)

Re: Palin the Saviour
 

Your karma, I drink it up.

Re: Palin the Saviour
 

Ah, personal insults...the mark of a losing argument...

Re: Palin the Saviour
 

Melly Snickers would argue that a good wanker can make a lot more money than a good commie.

Re: Palin the Saviour
 

I'm sure when you reviewed what you just wrote, you thought it witty and clever...

Re: Palin the Saviour
 

It would have been fraud if they hadn't submitted the applications! They were bound by law to submit all the applications they receive. I know it's really revolutionary and deviant to ensure as full enfranchisement as possible in a democracy. Personally, I'd rather disenfranchise the hockey moms rather than the poor, though.

Beyond that, they worked mainly in housing, exposing the illegal practice of red lining and the vile practice of predatory lending, and helping those who were the subject of this.

With the ridiculous ire of the [B]centre-right[B], you'd believe we were dealing with the Nazi party, IRA or the Red Brigade when you mention ACORN. It's farcical how ignorant some can be, and frightening how those who know it's lies continue to perpetrate it..

.

Re: Palin the Saviour
 

Careful, or you may be added to his 'these people' shitlist that he started compiling a few days ago (Code for 'anyone who doesn't agree with me');)

Re: Palin the Saviour
 

Cant wait to see this hockey mum trot back to Wasilla. Saviour? We might as well handwrite "Mickey Mouse for president" as this dumb ass.

If that puts me on anyone's shit list - Who cares.

*jumps off soap box*

Re: Palin the Saviour
 

Regarding pro or anti-choice....


Check this excerpt to see that the Republicans are not really anti-abortion. They are just using it for election purposes.

http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin465.htm

JOHN McCAIN PRO LIFE? WHAT A JOKE

By Chuck Baldwin
August 22, 2008
NewsWithViews.com

Once again, “pro-life” Christians are doing back flips to try and justify their compromise of the life issue by trying to convince everyone (including themselves) that John McCain is truly pro-life. However, these same people know in their hearts that John McCain shares no fidelity to the life issue in any significant or meaningful way. Like many in the Republican Party, McCain’s commitment to life is about as deep as a mud puddle.

Dare I remind everyone that the “pro-life” GOP controlled the entire federal government from 2000 to 2006 and nothing was done to overturn Roe v. Wade or end legal abortion-on-demand? When George W. Bush took the oath of office in January of 2001, over one million innocent unborn babies were being murdered in the wombs of their mothers every year via legal abortions in this country. And when George W. Bush leaves office in January of 2009, over one million innocent unborn babies would still be murdered in the wombs of their mothers every year via legal abortions in this country. Eight years of a “pro-life” President and six years of the “pro-life” GOP in charge of the entire federal government and not one unborn baby’s life has been saved. Roe v. Wade is still the law of the land, and abortion-on-demand is still legal in America.

Had John McCain and his fellow Republicans truly wanted to end legal abortion, they could have passed Congressman Ron Paul’s Sanctity of Life Act. Year after year, Dr. Paul introduced this bill, and year after year, it sat and collected dust in the document room on Capitol Hill.

What would Congressman Paul’s bill do? It would do two things: 1) It would define life as beginning at conception and, thus, declare the personhood of every pre-born child. 2) Under Article. III. Section. 2. of the U.S. Constitution, it would remove abortion from the jurisdiction of the Court. In practical terms, Dr. Paul’s bill would overturn Roe v. Wade and end legal abortion-on-demand. So, where was John McCain? Why did he not support Ron Paul’s bill and introduce a companion bill in the U.S. Senate?

How can John McCain, and his fellow Republicans in Washington, D.C., look pro-life Christians and conservatives in the eye in 2008 and expect that we take them seriously when they say that they are “pro-life”? If the GOP had truly wanted to overturn Roe v. Wade and end legal abortion-on-demand, they could have already done it. They controlled the White House, the U.S. Senate, and the House of Representatives for six long years, for goodness sake. The reason they did not do it is because they did not want to do it. They merely want to use “pro-life” rhetoric as a campaign tool to dupe gullible Christian voters every election year. And the disgusting thing about it is–it works.

check the link for the rest of the article…..
http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin465.htm

Re: Palin the Saviour
 

you've never heard of Mike Malloy then.

Re: Palin the Saviour
 

:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:

Re: Palin the Saviour
 

Re: Palin the Saviour
 

Welcome to the Octang Frye shit list you Commie!:lol: