![]() |
Re: Oregon incident.
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 11763600)
Anyway, I've come to the conclusion that guns are an addiction for America and for Americans. Like any addiction the first step is to recognise there is a problem, but they're still in denial.
|
Re: Oregon incident.
Obama needs to stand up and set an example.
|
Re: Oregon incident.
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 11763615)
Obama needs to stand up and set an example.
|
Re: Oregon incident.
Originally Posted by BubbleChog
(Post 11763545)
and I'm also annoyed that apparently because I support PP I'm a baby murderer and not allowed an opinion on gun issues
|
Re: Oregon incident.
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 11763616)
How? By handing over his guns?
|
Re: Oregon incident.
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 11763620)
Isn't that what he wants everybody to do?
|
Re: Oregon incident.
Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
(Post 11763614)
The NRA has been quite smart about the whole thing -- make guns a wedge issue for a vociferous minority, and that's all that is needed to move things toward the right. The gun opponents are not nearly determined.
a) Get money out of politics, including lobbyists and political donations from corporations b) Making the manufacturing and sale of guns and ammunition no longer profitable. After that Congress would no longer be beholden to the will of the NRA (which is essentially the political mouthpiece of the gun manufacturers) and could then actually enact some legislation. All the talk of the 2nd Amendment is just a trope to keep the proles in line. The government doesn't really give a shit about the sanctity of the Constitution. The way the Patriot Act pissed all over the 4th Amendment proves that. |
Re: Oregon incident.
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 11763627)
The way I see it is the only way to effect any real change in gun control is either:
a) Get money out of politics, including lobbyists and political donations from corporations b) Making the manufacturing and sale of guns and ammunition no longer profitable. After that Congress would no longer be beholden to the will of the NRA (which is essentially the political mouthpiece of the gun manufacturers) and could then actually enact some legislation. All the talk of the 2nd Amendment is just a trope to keep the proles in line. The government doesn't really give a shit about the sanctity of the Constitution. The way the Patriot Act pissed all over the 4th Amendment proves that. First, Heller would have to be overturned. That will take awhile, as a conservative on the Supreme Court would have to be replaced by a moderate or liberal in order to get a 5-4 vote. Then, Congress would have to pass a law, one that the current Congress would not pass and a Republican president would veto. Then, the feds would have to be willing to send troops into states that refuse to comply with the law, i.e. pretty much the entirety of the South and parts of the Midwest. And you can bet that there would be some violence. This would be like ending Jim Crow but on steroids. It wouldn't quite be a civil war, but it wouldn't be pretty. At the end of the day, the gun control/safety movement needs to figure out a way to appeal to the masses and/or shame the rabid minority if they want something to stick. (The latter is what the Aussies did after their last massacre.) US federalism makes it much harder to create change when there is a well-organized minority that is determined to prevent it. |
Re: Oregon incident.
Originally Posted by lansbury
(Post 11762900)
Roseburg isn't liberal. Not unusal to see people open carrying there. It is a farming area and has a high percentage of gun owners.
Perhaps instead of just gun control the gun control lobby would be better spending their time on nutter control and keeping guns out of the hands of the mentally challenged. Most responsible gun owners would support that. |
Re: Oregon incident.
Originally Posted by BubbleChog
(Post 11763545)
and I'm also annoyed that apparently because I support PP I'm a baby murderer and not allowed an opinion on gun issues
http://i531.photobucket.com/albums/d...ant%20even.gif |
Re: Oregon incident.
Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
(Post 11763632)
It's not that simple.
First, Heller would have to be overturned. That will take awhile, as a conservative on the Supreme Court would have to be replaced by a moderate or liberal in order to get a 5-4 vote. Then, Congress would have to pass a law, one that the current Congress would not pass and a Republican president would veto. Then, the feds would have to be willing to send troops into states that refuse to comply with the law, i.e. pretty much the entirety of the South and parts of the Midwest. And you can bet that there would be some violence. This would be like ending Jim Crow but on steroids. It wouldn't quite be a civil war, but it wouldn't be pretty. At the end of the day, the gun control/safety movement needs to figure out a way to appeal to the masses and/or shame the rabid minority if they want something to stick. (The latter is what the Aussies did after their last massacre.) US federalism makes it much harder to create change when there is a well-organized minority that is determined to prevent it. |
Re: Oregon incident.
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 11763624)
Does he even have any guns to had over? Oh and no that's not what he wants everyone to do.
|
Re: Oregon incident.
Not only is the Oregon sheriff an "oath keeper" but he thinks Sandy Hook was staged with actors.
Oregon Sheriff Handling School Massacre Shared a Sandy Hook Conspiracy Video | Mother Jones |
Re: Oregon incident.
Originally Posted by BubbleChog
(Post 11763640)
and then I get reported for harassment for politely pointing out that while they may not agree with my liberal suggestions at least I'm making some and not just bleating about the second amendment and the government trying to steal my guns
So it's OK to bleat on about those who are bleating on about the 2nd Amendment and making paranoid suggestions about the government stealing their guns. It's what makes being a BE thread contributor a truly fun and enriching experience. |
Re: Oregon incident.
Originally Posted by sir_eccles
(Post 11763655)
Not only is the Oregon sheriff an "oath keeper" but he thinks Sandy Hook was staged with actors.
Oregon Sheriff Handling School Massacre Shared a Sandy Hook Conspiracy Video | Mother Jones |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 7:16 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.