NHS

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 10th 2013, 4:13 pm
  #46  
Bob
BE Site Lead
 
Bob's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 92,170
Bob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: NHS

Originally Posted by AmerLisa
I don't think people anywhere run off to the doctor's office unless it's necessary in some fashion, unless you're a hypochondriac. If there's something bothering you, or you feel it's necessary to go and see a doctor, then you should go, but who goes just to get "their money's worth"?
Quite a few folks we knew where we used to live...especially parents taking kids to the doctors because they've got a sniffly nose and want something for the cold etc and it's usually for that very reason, they want to get their monies worth from having the insurance.

Sure that's not everyone.

But it's just the point that it isn't just a UK thing either because the NHS is free at point of service.
Bob is offline  
Old Feb 10th 2013, 4:26 pm
  #47  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 22,105
AmerLisa has a reputation beyond reputeAmerLisa has a reputation beyond reputeAmerLisa has a reputation beyond reputeAmerLisa has a reputation beyond reputeAmerLisa has a reputation beyond reputeAmerLisa has a reputation beyond reputeAmerLisa has a reputation beyond reputeAmerLisa has a reputation beyond reputeAmerLisa has a reputation beyond reputeAmerLisa has a reputation beyond reputeAmerLisa has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: NHS

Originally Posted by Bob
Quite a few folks we knew where we used to live...especially parents taking kids to the doctors because they've got a sniffly nose and want something for the cold etc and it's usually for that very reason, they want to get their monies worth from having the insurance.

Sure that's not everyone.

But it's just the point that it isn't just a UK thing either because the NHS is free at point of service.
I've written about my mil before, she's quite the hypochondriac and a nurse to boot! But she's at her doctor's surgery for every little hangnail and when she came over last June for a visit, she was taking more medication than, in my humble opinion, was probably necessary. But there's certainly no one stopping her, I would have thought her doctor would have referred her to a therapist by now. Every new little minor issue could be something of a catastrophe, so he sends her for every test under the sun. Still, it is free to her, she doesn't pay for office visits, nor prescriptions. Perhaps if she had to pay something, she might think twice....
AmerLisa is offline  
Old Feb 10th 2013, 5:13 pm
  #48  
 
Pulaski's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Dixie, ex UK
Posts: 52,439
Pulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: NHS

Originally Posted by Lion in Winter
....... The entire rest of the developed world has a form of socialized medicine. Make it better? Yes. Fund it properly? Yes. Organize it better? Of course. Turn it into a business? No.
I sympathize with your sentiment, and this is obviously a large and complex matter with a myriad of facets, but I find it bewildering that anyone would think that making the government responsible for funding, distributing and organizing anything would increase the supply and reduce the price.

Pretty much everything that governments touch become more expensive, harder to obtain, and typically of poorer quality to boot!
Pulaski is offline  
Old Feb 10th 2013, 5:18 pm
  #49  
BE Forum Addict
 
yellowroom's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Location: Was Virginia, now Yorkshire.
Posts: 2,333
yellowroom has a reputation beyond reputeyellowroom has a reputation beyond reputeyellowroom has a reputation beyond reputeyellowroom has a reputation beyond reputeyellowroom has a reputation beyond reputeyellowroom has a reputation beyond reputeyellowroom has a reputation beyond reputeyellowroom has a reputation beyond reputeyellowroom has a reputation beyond reputeyellowroom has a reputation beyond reputeyellowroom has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: NHS

Originally Posted by Pulaski
I sympathize with your sentiment, and this is obviously a large and complex matter with a myriad of facets, but I find it bewildering that anyone would think that making the government responsible for funding, distributing and organizing anything would increase the supply and reduce the price.

Pretty much everything that governments touch become more expensive, harder to obtain, and typically of poorer quality to boot!
US government, yes (state and federal). Other country's governments manage ok though.
yellowroom is offline  
Old Feb 10th 2013, 5:24 pm
  #50  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,847
HarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: NHS

Originally Posted by AmerLisa
I don't think people anywhere run off to the doctor's office unless it's necessary in some fashion, unless you're a hypochondriac. If there's something bothering you, or you feel it's necessary to go and see a doctor, then you should go, but who goes just to get "their money's worth"?
My experience/observations are hardly representative/scientific, BUT...

... it is my impression that people here (Phoenix, AZ) rush off to the doctor/proctologist/etc at the first sign of a sniffle, get allergy shots unbelievably frequently (like weekly or twice monthly) and so on - and STILL get ill, and STILL come to work and infect every other bugger. I don't think it's hypochondria, but when the TV and print media are shovelling ads about procedures and medications down your throat and scaring the bejesus out of you, is it any wonder?
HarryTheSpider is offline  
Old Feb 10th 2013, 5:55 pm
  #51  
 
Lion in Winter's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: East Seaxe
Posts: 72,526
Lion in Winter has a reputation beyond reputeLion in Winter has a reputation beyond reputeLion in Winter has a reputation beyond reputeLion in Winter has a reputation beyond reputeLion in Winter has a reputation beyond reputeLion in Winter has a reputation beyond reputeLion in Winter has a reputation beyond reputeLion in Winter has a reputation beyond reputeLion in Winter has a reputation beyond reputeLion in Winter has a reputation beyond reputeLion in Winter has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: NHS

Originally Posted by Pulaski
I sympathize with your sentiment, and this is obviously a large and complex matter with a myriad of facets, but I find it bewildering that anyone would think that making the government responsible for funding, distributing and organizing anything would increase the supply and reduce the price.

Pretty much everything that governments touch become more expensive, harder to obtain, and typically of poorer quality to boot!
I don't think this is right. We, and most of Europe, have successfully funded public education, public transport, public utilities, and public health for quite some time. I'm not sure about reducing the price - the difference is in how the price is set and met, and also about a societal decision on priorities as to what we spend our money on in terms of public goods.

I certainly preferred the quantity and price of train transport when we had smelly old British Rail and their terrible tea and sandwiches.
Lion in Winter is offline  
Old Feb 10th 2013, 8:10 pm
  #52  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,847
HarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: NHS

Originally Posted by Pulaski
I sympathize with your sentiment, and this is obviously a large and complex matter with a myriad of facets, but I find it bewildering that anyone would think that making the government responsible for funding, distributing and organizing anything would increase the supply and reduce the price.

Pretty much everything that governments touch become more expensive, harder to obtain, and typically of poorer quality to boot!
For the US government, Medicare/Medicaid provision, elements of education - 2 examples where government does it better than private industry within the US.
HarryTheSpider is offline  
Old Feb 10th 2013, 8:34 pm
  #53  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 22,105
AmerLisa has a reputation beyond reputeAmerLisa has a reputation beyond reputeAmerLisa has a reputation beyond reputeAmerLisa has a reputation beyond reputeAmerLisa has a reputation beyond reputeAmerLisa has a reputation beyond reputeAmerLisa has a reputation beyond reputeAmerLisa has a reputation beyond reputeAmerLisa has a reputation beyond reputeAmerLisa has a reputation beyond reputeAmerLisa has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: NHS

Originally Posted by HarryTheSpider
For the US government, Medicare/Medicaid provision, elements of education - 2 examples where government does it better than private industry within the US.
Good Lord! If that's how the US government does it better, then count me out! I'm all for some kind of universal healthcare system, but for Christ sakes, make it better than damn Medicare!

My grandmother just passed away a week ago, 97 years old and shouldn't have had a worry at all, well she didn't actually, that worry became mine as her next of kin and POA. I received a quick lesson in how much medicare does not pay for and how cheaply it does! If she had continued to live, with all other avenues exhausted, we would have been forced down the Medicaid road. As much as I miss her and I miss her a lot, I'm so glad that I wasn't forced to try and tackle that minefield.
AmerLisa is offline  
Old Feb 11th 2013, 12:59 am
  #54  
 
Pulaski's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Dixie, ex UK
Posts: 52,439
Pulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: NHS

Originally Posted by HarryTheSpider
For the US government, Medicare/Medicaid provision, elements of education - 2 examples where government does it better than private industry within the US.
AmerLisa has already commented on Medicare, but so far as education goes, the current estimate, as of January 2013, is that nationally 78% of children get their high school diploma, or more than 1 in 5, do not!

Saying, nothing at all about the quality of high school graduates, it is remarkable that more than 1 in 5 children don't even reach the finishing line, .... and astonishing that anyone would think that this is a level of achievement (for the education system) that is worth bragging about!

Further to the above statistic, the graduation rate in 2012, has just risen back to where it was forty years ago. In other words forty years of bussing, and sundry other programs such as "no child left behind", and no doubt countless billions of USD, and all that has been achieved is to get back to where we were two generations ago!

Maybe there are examples of successful government services, but neither AmerLisa or I are convinced by the examples you cited.

Last edited by Pulaski; Feb 11th 2013 at 1:04 am.
Pulaski is offline  
Old Feb 11th 2013, 1:25 am
  #55  
Account Closed
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
scrubbedexpat099 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: NHS

There was a story some time back about Denver Public Schools basically handing out HS Diploma's so those that failed, many of who could not speak English to any level of competency, did not come back for another year.

I have a friend who is a GP in the UK, certainly from what I gather his Surgery is full with time wasters.

I remember my Grandmother mentioning that she had a 20 year gap between Doctor visits, a bit extreme but in that sort of environment the NHS had a chance.

I have not looked into its funding but I did used to travel a bit to Holland, their system seemed to work.

There seems to be an assumption that it is US or UK, I would say neither.
scrubbedexpat099 is offline  
Old Feb 11th 2013, 1:50 am
  #56  
 
Pulaski's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Dixie, ex UK
Posts: 52,439
Pulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: NHS

Originally Posted by Boiler
.... There seems to be an assumption that it is US or UK, I would say neither.
Agreed. Anecdotally, I have also heard that Dutch healthcare is good/ efficient, and a minor medical matter I had attended to in Italy was also a very positive experience with little wait time, the attention of two doctors, and a bill so small that I considered it part of my holiday experience and not worth even try to claim on insurance for, despite my bring a student at the time .... though I did wonder if I got some credit for enabling the doctors to practice their English?
Pulaski is offline  
Old Feb 11th 2013, 4:13 am
  #57  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,847
HarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond reputeHarryTheSpider has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: NHS

Originally Posted by Pulaski
AmerLisa has already commented on Medicare, but so far as education goes, the current estimate, as of January 2013, is that nationally 78% of children get their high school diploma, or more than 1 in 5, do not!

Saying, nothing at all about the quality of high school graduates, it is remarkable that more than 1 in 5 children don't even reach the finishing line, .... and astonishing that anyone would think that this is a level of achievement (for the education system) that is worth bragging about!

Further to the above statistic, the graduation rate in 2012, has just risen back to where it was forty years ago. In other words forty years of bussing, and sundry other programs such as "no child left behind", and no doubt countless billions of USD, and all that has been achieved is to get back to where we were two generations ago!

Maybe there are examples of successful government services, but neither AmerLisa or I are convinced by the examples you cited.
Silly me - I thought we were discussing efficiency of service provision.

The government administered service costs approx 4% of total costs, private healthcare costs a shade under 12%. Healthcare provision (the bit that matters) is largely the same for both systems.

There are plenty of 'for profit' educational establishments that turn out sh1te and are the subject of investigations.

My badly made point is that just because it's 'government' does not mean it is worse than the private sector equivalent, or vice versa.
HarryTheSpider is offline  
Old Feb 11th 2013, 5:31 am
  #58  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,865
Giantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: NHS

Originally Posted by AmerLisa
Good Lord! If that's how the US government does it better, then count me out! I'm all for some kind of universal healthcare system, but for Christ sakes, make it better than damn Medicare!
Even Medicare consistently polls higher in user satisfaction than private health insurance does.
Giantaxe is offline  
Old Feb 11th 2013, 5:34 am
  #59  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,865
Giantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: NHS

Originally Posted by Duncan Roberts
However, being public means that things get published a lot more regarding the NHS than most of the US systems.
This is a very good point. I wouldn't even know how to start getting information about US hospitals that I see available about NHS hospitals.
Giantaxe is offline  
Old Feb 11th 2013, 6:37 am
  #60  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Location: bute
Posts: 9,740
scot47 has a reputation beyond reputescot47 has a reputation beyond reputescot47 has a reputation beyond reputescot47 has a reputation beyond reputescot47 has a reputation beyond reputescot47 has a reputation beyond reputescot47 has a reputation beyond reputescot47 has a reputation beyond reputescot47 has a reputation beyond reputescot47 has a reputation beyond reputescot47 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: NHS

Big scandal at the moment of course is Stafford Hospital. My experiences since I cam beack to live in Scotland in 2010 have been largely poitive. Waiting lists are a pain, but generally on our little island off the West Coast we get good service. That includes podiatry at the Health Centre and home visits from the District Nurse. For specialists I have to go to the nearest large town on the mainland.
scot47 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.