A language question
#61
Re: A language question
Another annoyance:
"First come, first serve."
That means that if you arrived first you're going to get put to work as a waiter.
What happened to "first come, first served"?
"First come, first serve."
That means that if you arrived first you're going to get put to work as a waiter.
What happened to "first come, first served"?
#62
Re: A language question
Maybe what is meant is "if you are the first to come, you are the first one we serve" ??
#64
Re: A language question
My kids have a habit of saying something happened 'on' accident instead of 'by' accident which doesn't sound right to me. I thought it was just them and some type of kid talk then I heard an adult the other day say it, so don't know whether it's an American thing or a regional thing??
#65
Re: A language question
My kids have a habit of saying something happened 'on' accident instead of 'by' accident which doesn't sound right to me. I thought it was just them and some type of kid talk then I heard an adult the other day say it, so don't know whether it's an American thing or a regional thing??
#66
Re: A language question
Yes, I think maybe that's where they get mixed up, but like I said I heard an adult say 'on accident' recently that's when I wondered if it's more widespread than I had thought. You would say 'by accident' wouldn't you?
#67
Re: A language question
Indeed and you are gonna sing for yer supper............thereby becoming a singing waiter.
#72
Re: A language question
On accident? Very odd. Do they say something is 'on the cards' or 'in the cards'? I'm thinking I might have heard Americans use the latter.
#74
I have a comma problem
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Fox Lake, IL (from Carrickfergus NI)
Posts: 49,598
#75
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 1,352
Re: A language question
I think I've heard both depending on context, but "on the cards" sounds more 'normal' to me. Linguistic background, western NY state with smatterings of Long Island and northwest states.