|
Re: Fish!
I had some rather good fried fish today. The chips were bloody awful though
http://i531.photobucket.com/albums/d...ps18551de7.jpg |
Re: Fish!
Oo that came out a bit big. Ooops
|
Re: Fish!
Originally Posted by BubbleChog
(Post 11448342)
I had some rather good fried fish today. The chips were bloody awful though. ....
|
Re: Fish!
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11448351)
"Fish"? Can you elaborate or was it that bland and tasteless you couldn't tell? :unsure:
|
Re: Fish!
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 11448353)
Most likely cod. An acceptable alternative when haddock is not available, IMO.
|
Re: Fish!
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11448351)
"Fish"? I need to know if I should be jealous, or lucky to have missed it? :lol:
|
Re: Fish!
Originally Posted by BubbleChog
(Post 11448364)
..... a tasty piece of cod
|
Re: Fish!
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11448367)
There's an adjective that doesn't really belong in the same sentence as "cod". :rolleyes:
|
Re: Fish!
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 11447626)
Haddock and chips or GTFO. Said it before but there seems to be a lot of advocating for the poncifying of fish dishes, which makes me sad.
Throwing a piece of salmon on the grill, or slicing a piece of tuna and eating it raw as sashimi isn't exactly 'poncifying' ... For those considering fish as a healthy alternative to meat, deep-frying in batter isn't exactly the first thing you should be thinking about when you consider eating fish. This is not a trivial issue - America has a serious obesity problem and eating more fish (not deep-fried fish) would help address it. |
Re: Fish!
Originally Posted by Nutek
(Post 11448285)
|
Re: Fish!
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11448165)
Which corner of the north would that be? Because in both my specific experience and general understanding is that Haddock is the "standard fish" in F'n'C in Yorkshire, and I'm from about as far south as it's possible to be while still being a northerner. :confused:
How Nutek came to be a fan of haddock with his chips is more of a mystery, unless you and he were accidentally switched at birth? :unsure: |
Re: Fish!
Originally Posted by Bob
(Post 11448451)
But so are the chips....and chips are good...
|
Re: Fish!
Originally Posted by Nutek
(Post 11448481)
They are not! Chips are a special food group all of their own. ;)
|
Re: Fish!
Originally Posted by Steerpike
(Post 11448441)
Come on, now ... there are dozens of mainstream types of fish (Halibut, Salmon, Tuna, etc) and several basic methods of preparation ... pan fry, deep fry, bake, boil, steam, smoke, grill ... it's a bit limiting to only consider deep-frying battered haddock ...
Throwing a piece of salmon on the grill, or slicing a piece of tuna and eating it raw as sashimi isn't exactly 'poncifying' ... For those considering fish as a healthy alternative to meat, deep-frying in batter isn't exactly the first thing you should be thinking about when you consider eating fish. This is not a trivial issue - America has a serious obesity problem and eating more fish (not deep-fried fish) would help address it. I enjoy crab and keep eye out for when Costco have king crab legs in. I still need to bring myself to cook an live lobster. :o |
Re: Fish!
Originally Posted by BubbleChog
(Post 11448484)
I count chips as one of my 5 a day. Like wine because that's fruit and chocolate because that's a bean
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 5:12 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.