Consequences of the UK leaving Europe
#136
Re: Consequences of the UK leaving Europe
So would we leave the EU and join the EEA? I am assuming that would be the logical step. So what exactly does leaving the EU mean with regards to trade and freedom of movement? If it doesn't affect these two things, what's all the commotion about?
Some of this just doesn't make sense
Some of this just doesn't make sense
The referendum only gives the government the mandate for us leave the EU, not the single market, and therefore if the country was to vote Brexit then the government simply negotiates for the UK to rejoin EFTA to retain our place within the EEA.
For my money this would be the best scenario as it would permit the UK to retain access to the single market and the four freedoms (movement of goods, capital, services and people) but we would be free again to conduct our own free trade agreements with countries outside the EU and we would regain control over a number of areas which are currently within Brussels' purview e.g. the Common Agriculture and Fisheries Policy, Common Foreign and Security Policy and Justice and Home Affairs.
This would be the quickest and simplest way of doing it. The longer way would be to do what Switzerland did and join EFTA but not sign the EEA Agreement and instead negotiate a series of bilateral treaties with the EU in regards to which areas of the single market we would want to continue to be a part of and those which we wouldn't (i.e. freedom of movement of people).
#138
Re: Consequences of the UK leaving Europe
I will lol at all the anti-immigration Brexiters if the UK ends up having to accept the free movement of labour either to continue to be in the EEA or to have a free trade deal with the EU (a la Switzerland).
#139
Re: Consequences of the UK leaving Europe
We're already in the EEA. The confusion lies in politicians on both sides spinning like mad to make you believe the referendum is about choosing whether or not to leave the single market when it's solely about our EU membership. The two coexist in parallel but are separate.
The referendum only gives the government the mandate for us leave the EU, not the single market, and therefore if the country was to vote Brexit then the government simply negotiates for the UK to rejoin EFTA to retain our place within the EEA.
For my money this would be the best scenario as it would permit the UK to retain access to the single market and the four freedoms (movement of goods, capital, services and people) but we would be free again to conduct our own free trade agreements with countries outside the EU and we would regain control over a number of areas which are currently within Brussels' purview e.g. the Common Agriculture and Fisheries Policy, Common Foreign and Security Policy and Justice and Home Affairs.
This would be the quickest and simplest way of doing it. The longer way would be to do what Switzerland did and join EFTA but not sign the EEA Agreement and instead negotiate a series of bilateral treaties with the EU in regards to which areas of the single market we would want to continue to be a part of and those which we wouldn't (i.e. freedom of movement of people).
The referendum only gives the government the mandate for us leave the EU, not the single market, and therefore if the country was to vote Brexit then the government simply negotiates for the UK to rejoin EFTA to retain our place within the EEA.
For my money this would be the best scenario as it would permit the UK to retain access to the single market and the four freedoms (movement of goods, capital, services and people) but we would be free again to conduct our own free trade agreements with countries outside the EU and we would regain control over a number of areas which are currently within Brussels' purview e.g. the Common Agriculture and Fisheries Policy, Common Foreign and Security Policy and Justice and Home Affairs.
This would be the quickest and simplest way of doing it. The longer way would be to do what Switzerland did and join EFTA but not sign the EEA Agreement and instead negotiate a series of bilateral treaties with the EU in regards to which areas of the single market we would want to continue to be a part of and those which we wouldn't (i.e. freedom of movement of people).
#140
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,865
Re: Consequences of the UK leaving Europe
We're already in the EEA. The confusion lies in politicians on both sides spinning like mad to make you believe the referendum is about choosing whether or not to leave the single market when it's solely about our EU membership. The two coexist in parallel but are separate.
The referendum only gives the government the mandate for us leave the EU, not the single market, and therefore if the country was to vote Brexit then the government simply negotiates for the UK to rejoin EFTA to retain our place within the EEA.
For my money this would be the best scenario as it would permit the UK to retain access to the single market and the four freedoms (movement of goods, capital, services and people) but we would be free again to conduct our own free trade agreements with countries outside the EU and we would regain control over a number of areas which are currently within Brussels' purview e.g. the Common Agriculture and Fisheries Policy, Common Foreign and Security Policy and Justice and Home Affairs.
This would be the quickest and simplest way of doing it. The longer way would be to do what Switzerland did and join EFTA but not sign the EEA Agreement and instead negotiate a series of bilateral treaties with the EU in regards to which areas of the single market we would want to continue to be a part of and those which we wouldn't (i.e. freedom of movement of people).
The referendum only gives the government the mandate for us leave the EU, not the single market, and therefore if the country was to vote Brexit then the government simply negotiates for the UK to rejoin EFTA to retain our place within the EEA.
For my money this would be the best scenario as it would permit the UK to retain access to the single market and the four freedoms (movement of goods, capital, services and people) but we would be free again to conduct our own free trade agreements with countries outside the EU and we would regain control over a number of areas which are currently within Brussels' purview e.g. the Common Agriculture and Fisheries Policy, Common Foreign and Security Policy and Justice and Home Affairs.
This would be the quickest and simplest way of doing it. The longer way would be to do what Switzerland did and join EFTA but not sign the EEA Agreement and instead negotiate a series of bilateral treaties with the EU in regards to which areas of the single market we would want to continue to be a part of and those which we wouldn't (i.e. freedom of movement of people).
The question on the ballot is 'Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?' not 'leave the EEA/single market/pull up the drawbridge and stick two fingers up to Juncker and Merkel?'. The government and every major party is in favour of 'Remain' so if the vote was to go then there's absolutely nothing to stop the UK from remaining within the single market. In fact there would be no mandate to withdraw us from it. The debate on the actual question is not the one we are having.
Last edited by Giantaxe; Jun 15th 2016 at 10:30 pm.
#141
Re: Consequences of the UK leaving Europe
So voting to leave the EU does not limit freedom of movement of people and goods. I believe the EEA still has rules that need to be followed. So what exactly does staying or leaving change. There is just too much emphasis on immigration from the leavers and the consequences of leaving a single market from the remains.
Right, which is why the whole thing seems particularly bizarre from this distance at least.
#142
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,865
Re: Consequences of the UK leaving Europe
The referendum is not legally binding. For all the talk of it being "the British people who will decide" next week the constitution of the UK means that Parliament is sovereign, they are the ones who will have to vote after the referendum on what to do and the Prime Minister, most of the Cabinet and the vast majority of MPs from all parties are pro-Remain and will be doing their damnedest to maintain the status quo. Just because Messers Gove and Johnson want us to leave the single market doesn't mean we have to or will. Again we're not debating the actual question.
#143
Re: Consequences of the UK leaving Europe
If we opted to remain within the EEA by other means? Some fairly serious repatriation of power from Brussels on certain issues (see previous post), less EU law to implement and less financial contributions to make but the single market, the most important bit, would remain more or less as it is now.
A lot of EU legislation makes sense and may not have happened if it was just left up to the UK.
#144
Re: Consequences of the UK leaving Europe
Norway, which by virtue of its relative size provides the vast majority of EEA contributions, provided £524m in 2011, or £106 per capita. This compares to the UK’s net budget contribution that year of £8.1bn, or £128 per capita. If the UK left the EU and instead contributed to the EU budget on the same basis as Norway, its contributions would fall by around 17%.
#145
Banned
Joined: Dec 2015
Location: california
Posts: 6,035
Re: Consequences of the UK leaving Europe
I imagine his attitude would be "They've made their bed now let em get on with it"
I would also imagine that there will be some long lasting feelings of intense divisiveness amongst the British people.
How do the Scots feel about it for example? If the majority of Scots favour remaining in the EU then the Scots Nats would probably push for another referendum on remaining as part of the UK
#146
Re: Consequences of the UK leaving Europe
An interesting opinion piece from today's NYT:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/19/op...e-england.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/19/op...e-england.html
#147
Re: Consequences of the UK leaving Europe
The referendum result, if its for "Leave" doesn't mean that article 50 has to be invoked that second. As BiP says, Parliament is supreme. The serious negotiating then begins.
#148
Re: Consequences of the UK leaving Europe
W
The two biggest complaints most people have about 'Europe' - unrestricted immigration from EU countries and the role of the ECHR in overturning British legal decisions - would be wholly unaffected by Brexit as the UK would continue to be a member of the EEA and CoE respectively.
The two biggest complaints most people have about 'Europe' - unrestricted immigration from EU countries and the role of the ECHR in overturning British legal decisions - would be wholly unaffected by Brexit as the UK would continue to be a member of the EEA and CoE respectively.
Actually. I wish BiPs posts were out there. Very informative.
#149
Re: Consequences of the UK leaving Europe
I think most people are now at the stage of only seeing/hearing information that reinforces their point of view, and are sick to death of the whole thing. Roll on Thursday and then maybe we can move on whichever way the country votes.
#150
Re: Consequences of the UK leaving Europe
I am still unsure whether the UK would join the EEA or just go off on its own and use WTO agreements. Does Brexit mean pulling out of everything Europe?