![]() |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12899840)
BBC reviewed Joe's speech, seems it is contagious:
DNC 2020: Joe Biden convention speech fact-checked https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53858940 |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by civilservant
(Post 12899857)
So there's an incorrect figure in there. A single one, on the number of small businesses that have closed.
As opposed to over 20,000 lies that have been told by your candidate since 2016. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by kimilseung
(Post 12899920)
New levels of own goal from Mr Bolier.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12899937)
I do not have a candidate.
How do I know? Why he told me he is. Ten times a day for the last five years. |
Re: 2020 Election
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog...vel-convention
Interesting point about the effectiveness of speeches, I thought. I must admit, the only ones I’ve listened to so far are Michelle Obama and President Obama, but this comment definitely applies; This speech was also another example that we are better for a virtual convention. Applause lines and crowd interaction would have diminished this speech. It was highly direct, close-up. Though it was obviously a tightly-tailored and considered speech, this made for something more intimate and direct. Seeing crowd shots and cheer lines and all that clutter of conventioneering only would have reduced the moment. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by kimilseung
(Post 12899953)
Boiler is an independent, don't you know.
How do I know? Why he told me he is. Ten times a day for the last five years. I have said I supported Tulsi. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by kimilseung
(Post 12899920)
New levels of own goal from Mr Bolier.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12900010)
I do not recollect telling you anything never mind ten times a day for five years.
I have said I supported Tulsi.
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12701281)
Independent
Originally Posted by johnwoo
(Post 12701254)
I'm presuming you are not a Democrat?
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by robin1234
(Post 12899961)
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog...vel-convention
Interesting point about the effectiveness of speeches, I thought. I must admit, the only ones I’ve listened to so far are Michelle Obama and President Obama, but this comment definitely applies; |
Re: 2020 Election
So no social distancing or masks last night at the White House. Are sitting Presidents allowed to do electioneering from the WH? Obviously he cares not for rules and is able to get away with whatever he wants to do, just curious.
|
Re: 2020 Election
It's another one of those 'norms' that he is ignoring, but there is no specific law against it. If I'm not mistaken I think FDR also made an acceptance speech from the WH during WW2.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Numerous violations of the Hatch Act, most noticeably by the Secretary of State.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Giantaxe
(Post 12900082)
And yet you wrote this:
in reply to this: |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12901906)
I favoured Tulsi. Perfect, of course not but by far the best on offer.
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12901143)
Does seem the most likely answer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMOejqbhB8A |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by kimilseung
(Post 12901918)
Should we believe all Boilers, or not?
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 3:51 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.