|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by MMcD
(Post 12865317)
and now...
He's hitting the campaign trail once again - beginning next Wed 19 June in Tulsa Oklahoma *** (see link below) Gonna pack 'em in (social distancing be damned). Adoring, un-masked (?) throngs screaming and yelping - their air-borne droplets floating here, there, everywhere... It will be interesting to follow the impact of this stunt upon the movement of the poll projections, published today, by The Economist : https://projects.economist.com/us-20...cast/president ***June 19th salt in wound: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/10/u...-oklahoma.html I dont believe he is well read enough to keep hitting these dog whistles. Too many coincidences for them to be coincidence. He must have a Minster for Dog Whistling advising him. |
Re: 2020 Election
Maybe we should have a poll with 4 x choices. https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/smilies/eek.gif
1. Win for Trump 2. Win for Biden 3. Election in November cancelled due to COVID 19. 4. Election goes ahead and due to allegations from both sides the result is declared null and void and another election is held in the future. Can there be a draw? If so then that's a 5th choice. Each serves 2 years https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/smilies/lol.gif |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by kimilseung
(Post 12865485)
Tulsa on Junteenth can not be a mistake.
I dont believe he is well read enough to keep hitting these dog whistles. Too many coincidences for them to be coincidence. He must have a Minster for Dog Whistling advising him. BTW: it's uncanny how much he resembles Vladimir Putin- in more senses than 3 |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by MMcD
(Post 12865492)
{..snipped....picture of Putin, er Miller...)
BTW: it's uncanny how much he resembles Vladimir Putin- in more senses than 3 |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by kimilseung
(Post 12865551)
Funny you said that. I scrolled and for a fraction of a second thought it was Putin, realized it was Miller, than saw your words.
He's in the thrall of 2 masters of manipulation - each of whom bears an uncanny physical resemblance to the other. Combine the puppeteers and their poppet.... and the world gets played by a creepy and dangerous trio from hell :devil_smile::devil_smile::devil_smile: |
Re: 2020 Election
Adding this to a few more threads. I know it's off topic, but Jersey's put it in lots of places so I think I'm safe.
Any help at all would be greatly appreciated, I know. https://britishexpats.com/forum/trai.../#post12866185 |
Re: 2020 Election
"YUGE", significant SCOTUS kick-in-the-face to Trump administration this morning:
They ruled 6-3, with Roberts writing for majority, that effort to end DACA was "arbitrary and capricious" ! WOO-HOO !!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Re: 2020 Election
Um... the decision was 5-4, with the Chief Justice joining the liberal wing of the court.
A good decision, but hardly as depicted above 'a kick in the face' The 6-3 decision was on the Civil Rights Act yesterday. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by civilservant
(Post 12868784)
Um... the decision was 5-4, with the Chief Justice joining the liberal wing of the court.
A good decision, but hardly as depicted above 'a kick in the face' The 6-3 decision was on the Civil Rights Act yesterday. |
Re: 2020 Election
Of course they should be happy - but you are aware that the decision does not preclude him doing the same thing, tomorrow, based on a slightly different rationale, right?
Muslim ban, anyone? This is the problem with governing via Executive Order. You're asking courts to navel gaze into the reasons for taking a specific course. At least when Congress takes action, it is easier to speculate intent in a full piece of legislation. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by civilservant
(Post 12868793)
Of course they should be happy - but you are aware that the decision does not preclude him doing the same thing, tomorrow, based on a slightly different rationale, right?
Muslim ban, anyone? This is the problem with governing via Executive Order. You're asking courts to navel gaze into the reasons for taking a specific course. At least when Congress takes action, it is easier to speculate intent in a full piece of legislation. |
Re: 2020 Election
Amy Klobuchar has removed herself from consideration as Biden's running mate, stating that he would be better off with a woman of colour as VP.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by caretaker
(Post 12869126)
Amy Klobuchar has removed herself from consideration as Biden's running mate, stating that he would be better off with a woman of colour as VP.
|
Re: 2020 Election
This is simply her jumping before she was pushed IMO.
With her record as a prosecutor in the geographic area where Floyd was murdered, and her reputation as someone who usually stood by the Police, she was too toxic to pick anyway. I'm sure Biden told her he was moving on from her and she asked to be allowed to drop out herself. |
Re: 2020 Election
Isn't choosing somebody purely on the basis of their colour racist?
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 7:04 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.