2020 Election
#1757
Banned
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,830
Re: 2020 Election
Well la-ti-da I will forthwith and henceforth dose myself with truth serum and strap myself to a lie detector machine, before I dare mention one of your precious postings, lest I be tempted to cheapen my stellar reputation with an embellishment. Oh the shame.
Anyhoodles, back here on planet earth --- apparently you've been pissing off a lot of people with your bragging/condescending combo. You can either take heed or keep lashing out but, either way, the problem is most definitely YOU.
Anyhoodles, back here on planet earth --- apparently you've been pissing off a lot of people with your bragging/condescending combo. You can either take heed or keep lashing out but, either way, the problem is most definitely YOU.
#1758
Banned
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,830
Re: 2020 Election
In this part of the US, San Francisco Area. Even a modest home is selling for around $1.0 Mil. I paid $40K for a modest Home now selling close to $1.0 M. High salary Hi Tech has inflated just about everything here leaving many low income people on the streets or struggling to make it day to day.
My cousin in Los Angeles bought his home for $37k and now its worth 1.3 million.
#1759
Re: 2020 Election
Today you have accused Leslie and Robin (both long time BE members/prolific posters) of stirring the pot/being trolls. All they have done is called you out on the contents of your posts. Perhaps it is you who is stirring the pot/trolling.
Last edited by Jerseygirl; Dec 18th 2019 at 8:53 pm. Reason: Typo
#1760
Re: 2020 Election
From ...
https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/11/...id-they-go-to/
• Top destinations: In raw terms of people moving, the top spot for Californians is Texas, which got 86,164 Californians in 2018. Next came Arizona (68,516), Washington (55,467), Nevada (50,707), and Oregon (43,058). All told, California had the most exits among the state and that wave grew by 4% in a year.
• Largest net gain: Texas also had the largest “net gain” from California — more ins than outs — with 48,354. Next was Arizona (34,846), Nevada (28,274), Oregon (19,008), and Washington (17,460).
Idaho only gets a mention if you do an analysis of ratios:
• Greatest ratio of ins to outs: Or look at the comings and goings as a ratio of ins to outs. Idaho wins this race with 497 arrivals from the Golden State for every 100 former Potato State residents who moved to California. Next was South Carolina (247 ins per 100 out); Texas (228); Nevada (226); and Arizona (203).
https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/11/...id-they-go-to/
• Top destinations: In raw terms of people moving, the top spot for Californians is Texas, which got 86,164 Californians in 2018. Next came Arizona (68,516), Washington (55,467), Nevada (50,707), and Oregon (43,058). All told, California had the most exits among the state and that wave grew by 4% in a year.
• Largest net gain: Texas also had the largest “net gain” from California — more ins than outs — with 48,354. Next was Arizona (34,846), Nevada (28,274), Oregon (19,008), and Washington (17,460).
Idaho only gets a mention if you do an analysis of ratios:
• Greatest ratio of ins to outs: Or look at the comings and goings as a ratio of ins to outs. Idaho wins this race with 497 arrivals from the Golden State for every 100 former Potato State residents who moved to California. Next was South Carolina (247 ins per 100 out); Texas (228); Nevada (226); and Arizona (203).
#1761
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,865
Re: 2020 Election
I suspect, purely through empirical evidence that more are coming into California than are leaving. All along hwy 680 from San Jose to Walnut Creek new home construction is booming. Many if not most are Asian immigrants working in Hi Tech/IT. I see the performance records of all the local schools have risen significantly.
#1762
Re: 2020 Election
UPDATE - what I said above is wrong, according to this - https://qz.com/1599150/californias-p...ing-very-soon/ According to this (which I have no reason to doubt), "California’s population did still increase in 2018 by almost 160,000 people, largely due to the 480,000 people born in the state" ... "Besides births, the main reason California’s population hasn’t already started falling has been international migration into the state. Every year since 2011, net domestic migration has been negative—i.e., more people leave California than move in from other states. But from 2011 to 2016, the number of international migrants moving into California was larger than the number of locals who were moving out. Since then, however, domestic departures have outstripped international arrivals. In 2018, 156,000 locals left the state, compared to 118,000 international who came."
Making such an observation can get you labeled a racist . Absolutely nuts, but true.
Last edited by Steerpike; Dec 19th 2019 at 6:23 am.
#1763
Re: 2020 Election
" You can't make this shit up"
https://dailysoundandfury.com/breaki...m_campaign=tti
https://dailysoundandfury.com/breaki...m_campaign=tti
#1764
Heading for Poppyland
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: North Norfolk and northern New York State
Posts: 14,575
Re: 2020 Election
" You can't make this shit up"
https://dailysoundandfury.com/breaki...m_campaign=tti
https://dailysoundandfury.com/breaki...m_campaign=tti
#1765
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,865
Re: 2020 Election
Yes, net population of CA is increasing, and the reason is more people are coming in from overseas than are leaving to other states. And this is not low-paid Mexican labor; this is high paid, high tech.
UPDATE - what I said above is wrong, according to this - https://qz.com/1599150/californias-p...ing-very-soon/ According to this (which I have no reason to doubt), "California’s population did still increase in 2018 by almost 160,000 people, largely due to the 480,000 people born in the state" ... "Besides births, the main reason California’s population hasn’t already started falling has been international migration into the state. Every year since 2011, net domestic migration has been negative—i.e., more people leave California than move in from other states. But from 2011 to 2016, the number of international migrants moving into California was larger than the number of locals who were moving out. Since then, however, domestic departures have outstripped international arrivals. In 2018, 156,000 locals left the state, compared to 118,000 international who came."
UPDATE - what I said above is wrong, according to this - https://qz.com/1599150/californias-p...ing-very-soon/ According to this (which I have no reason to doubt), "California’s population did still increase in 2018 by almost 160,000 people, largely due to the 480,000 people born in the state" ... "Besides births, the main reason California’s population hasn’t already started falling has been international migration into the state. Every year since 2011, net domestic migration has been negative—i.e., more people leave California than move in from other states. But from 2011 to 2016, the number of international migrants moving into California was larger than the number of locals who were moving out. Since then, however, domestic departures have outstripped international arrivals. In 2018, 156,000 locals left the state, compared to 118,000 international who came."
#1766
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: 2020 Election
I have no particular interest in this but amazing how many times you come across comments suggesting that they are not very welcomed.
#1768
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: 2020 Election
Californians, well it also used to be Texans but they seem to get less of a mention.
#1770
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,865
Re: 2020 Election
Odds of Tulsi "not present" Gabbard running as an independent?