![]() |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by AlexL
(Post 12080026)
You chaps do realise that the MSM in the US is quite frankly Orwellian in its level of propaganda, is an extension of the Clinton campaign due to owners being donators to the Clinton campaign. Just take a look at air time devoted to coverage of alleged 30 year old sex scandals compared to wikileaks.
You chaps must also realise that voter fraud is a very real thing, you should also realise that George Soros owns many of the actual electronic voting terminals. An hour after Obama described voter fraud as a myth, this video drops: <snip> HRC is unpopular not because of 'misogynism' but because she is clearly corrupt and a truly terrible person if you actually do any research. As someone who has followed the election from the start the double standards and cognitive dissonance displayed by people astounds me. Good grief..anothe troll has found us. Although it is likely just another identity for an existing one. |
Re: 2016 Election
Seems Assange has some serious dirt on Hillary, Ecuador has been pressurised to cut his internet access.
I imagine there are Hot Spots being set up outside the Embassy as I type. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12080147)
Seems Assange has some serious dirt on Hillary, Ecuador has been pressurised to cut his internet access.
I imagine there are Hot Spots being set up outside the Embassy as I type. |
Re: 2016 Election
Then why cut his internet?
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12080151)
Then why cut his internet?
|
Re: 2016 Election
But they have it in for the US? Odd way of showing it.
|
Re: 2016 Election
One suspects that wikileaks would be foolish to have a single point of failure.
|
Re: 2016 Election
I agree, so whatsitallabout?
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12080161)
But they have it in for the US? Odd way of showing it.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by dakota44
(Post 12080166)
You don't know much about Ecuador...do you. Their currency is the U.S. dollar. Tends to give them pause to piss off the U.S. too much I would think.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by sir_eccles
(Post 12080163)
One suspects that wikileaks would be foolish to have a single point of failure.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12080167)
I think we have just gone around a full circle.:lol:
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by anotherlimey
(Post 12080168)
Wikileaks was supposed to have built in redundancy.
I presume Ecuador doesn't want to be seen aiding interference in a US election, thus making it more difficult for them to complain if the US did the reverse in a future Ecuadorean election. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12080164)
I agree, so whatsitallabout?
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12080151)
Then why cut his internet?
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 11:05 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.