British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   The Trailer Park (https://britishexpats.com/forum/trailer-park-96/)
-   -   2016 Election (https://britishexpats.com/forum/trailer-park-96/2016-election-855107/)

Gordon Barlow Aug 7th 2016 11:41 am

Re: 2016 Election
 
Can't resist posting these comments, on the likely next Commander-in-Chief of the US Military Industrial Complex.
SHOCK PHOTO: Multiple staffers help unstable Hillary up stairs - The American MirrorThe American Mirror

Jerseygirl Aug 7th 2016 11:44 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by Gordon Barlow (Post 12021878)
Can't resist posting these comments, on the likely next Commander-in-Chief of the US Military Industrial Complex.
SHOCK PHOTO: Multiple staffers help unstable Hillary up stairs - The American MirrorThe American Mirror

In fairness...she was probably a little shaken after dodging sniper fire in Bosnia. :lol:

sir_eccles Aug 7th 2016 12:26 pm

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by Gordon Barlow (Post 12021878)
Can't resist posting these comments, on the likely next Commander-in-Chief of the US Military Industrial Complex.
SHOCK PHOTO: Multiple staffers help unstable Hillary up stairs - The American MirrorThe American Mirror

You do know those pics are from February? Tripped on the step according to reports.

morpeth Aug 7th 2016 1:53 pm

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by sir_eccles (Post 12021861)
But we actually learned quite a lot from Romney's return. Such as where his income came from ( mostly investments) and the fact that he fudged his return by specifically not counting half his charitable donations so that his overall tax rate wasn't too low.

I have to admit I am finding this discussion interesting. I am unsure at least to me what bearing it would have whether he received more money in salary or investments on whether I would have voted for him, especially as the wealthy have various ways of planning how they receive or defer income that the rest of us typically don't have, so there tax returns don't show what many seem to think they do.

As far as him not deducting half his charitable contributions, out of curiosity where would that show on his return ? And there are charitable contributions one can make that are not deductible. If you are correct that his intent to show his tax rate too low what a funny society- someone thinks it is advantageous for political reasons to show less donations because people think it is a negative someone has a lower effective tax rate. Better issue is the damn tax code in the first place that both parties have made so complicated making it easier for wealthy people often to have such low effective tax rates.

anotherlimey Aug 7th 2016 2:02 pm

Re: 2016 Election
 
It's commonplace to release tax returns, he should do it if there's nothing in them as he says.

If he was dirt poor and had no income he should still do it.

morpeth Aug 7th 2016 2:16 pm

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by anotherlimey (Post 12021931)
It's commonplace to release tax returns, he should do it if there's nothing in them as he says.

If he was dirt poor and had no income he should still do it.

My original comments were that the quoted reasons people gave for seeing his tax returns, such as his "net worth" , were quite incorrect as the tax returns wouldn't show such things- it appeared to me those bringing up his tax returns had such limited understanding of financial matters it wouldn't help them anyway, or the interest was just to find something they could portray as a negative.

Someone posted though that undecided voters might want to see his returns as for them it would be important.

I agree though probably wouldn't have mattered anyway if he had released, so probably a poor political move. Part of his appeal, or entertainment value is his just deciding to go against the establishment and conventional wisdom.

Gordon Barlow Aug 7th 2016 3:16 pm

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by sir_eccles (Post 12021895)
You do know those pics are from February? Tripped on the step according to reports.

Doesn't matter, Eccles! Just trying to lighten the moment. The fix is in long ago, so it's not a cliff-hanger any more.

sir_eccles Aug 7th 2016 3:36 pm

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by Gordon Barlow (Post 12021949)
Doesn't matter, Eccles! Just trying to lighten the moment. The fix is in long ago, so it's not a cliff-hanger any more.

Did you forget your meds today?

anotherlimey Aug 7th 2016 3:59 pm

Re: 2016 Election
 
Lol, why am I seeing this ad when I view this thread?

http://i64.tinypic.com/1zvsvhu.png

sir_eccles Aug 7th 2016 5:13 pm

Re: 2016 Election
 
So Meredith was just another John Baron persona?

http://www.dailynewsbin.com/news/twi...-person/25566/

zargof Aug 8th 2016 2:23 am

Re: 2016 Election
 
So there's a new player in town: Evan McMullin.

Yeah, me neither.

http://www.evanmcmullin.com/

Philk Aug 8th 2016 3:46 am

Re: 2016 Election
 
Wondering if the Olympics will have any influence on the election...

Terrorist attack might give Donny a bounce

US winning a ton of gold medals - feel good factor and a counter to Trumps 'we always lose, America is crap' pitch

sir_eccles Aug 8th 2016 3:49 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by zargof (Post 12022280)
So there's a new player in town: Evan McMullin.

Yeah, me neither.

Evan McMullin for President

The hot take I'm reading in a number of places suggest his Mormon credentials would help split voters in Utah and Arizona. Clever tactic if he can get on the ballot.

dakota44 Aug 8th 2016 7:15 am

Re: 2016 Election
 
Very interesting and spot on.

50 GOP NatSec Officials Warn: Trump a Security ‘Risk’ - The Daily Beast

Jerseygirl Aug 8th 2016 7:27 am

Re: 2016 Election
 

Originally Posted by dakota44 (Post 12022524)

We already know Clinton is a security risk.


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 7:12 pm.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.