![]() |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by morpeth
(Post 12021744)
This is what is annoying and amusing about this election - if one questions something about Trump , the response is what Clinton does, if one questions what Clinton does, then the response is what Trump does.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by morpeth
(Post 12021760)
(I inserted my responses within your quote, don't know how to insert your quote within y response as you do).
... quote=xxxx (wrapped in [ and ] ) blah blah /quote (wrapped in [ and ] ) (your response here) quote=xxxx (wrapped in [ and ] ) blah blah /quote (wrapped in [ and ] ) (your response here) |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12021718)
I find it incredibly sad that certain people actually believe he's going to reopen the coal mines and steel mills. He said it himself, "I love the poorly educated." Of course he does, they've never taken a course in critical thinking and have no idea how to deconstruct a fallacious argument.
IIRC Trump's "base", those that will vote for him no matter what, give him a solid floor of about 30%. The fact that Clinton is NOT polling at 60-70% is testament to what a shit candidate she is herself. I agree he has a certain floor, and other voters will hold their nose and put Clinton over the top- I think she will win by the greatest landslide in history in terms of the electoral college. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Steerpike
(Post 12021764)
when you hit 'reply', you see an opening 'tag' that shows 'QUOTE=....' , and an ending 'tag' that shows '/QUOTE'. These are wrapped in opening and closing brackets ( [ and ] ). You basically copy/paste those to end the first quote and then open the second quote. as in ...
quote=xxxx (wrapped in [ and ] ) blah blah /quote (wrapped in [ and ] ) (your response here) quote=xxxx (wrapped in [ and ] ) blah blah /quote (wrapped in [ and ] ) (your response here) |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by morpeth
(Post 12021760)
(I inserted my responses within your quote, don't know how to insert your quote within y response as you do).
I think you raise a very valid point, I cant imagine him not taking into account his business interests while in office especially if his children are running the business. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by sir_eccles
(Post 12021741)
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12021762)
Actually, no. You were commenting about Trump and she answered you with her own comments about Trump.
Reflecting on your posts on the tax returns , I have no reason to believe Trump has cheated on his returns though I assume he is very aggressive about taking advantage of the current tax code. On the subject of his releasing his returns maybe I am influenced by part of the country I live in- haven't heard anyone locally in discussing the election mention once his tax returns. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by morpeth
(Post 12021752)
Bernie besides his character, had the advantage of an economic plan that wouldn't just tinker here and there, but make a dramatic gamble to turn the country around. Clinton's more of the same plus more regulation, more costs on business etc hardly a recipe for economic growth, Trumps "plan" doesn't seem to be a cohesive overall plan. Halfway measures I have heard from Trump or Clinton haven't convinced me either would solve the deep problems of the US economy.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by amideislas
(Post 12021775)
More like a recipe for long term depression. All for good causes of course. But that's what naive idealism is all about. Nothing is perfect; Rome wasn't built in a day. Easy come, easy go. A fool and his money soon part ways. That's how it's always been, and always will be. There's always a rational middle ground, and throughout history, that's always been the most successful formula.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12021771)
He and Weld are very refreshing. Since I don't live in a swing state, I'm seriously thinking about voting for them. :lol:
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 12021768)
Okay. I'm done. It's clear you refuse to admit that there is anything to be learned from his tax returns. If you were correct, and you are not, it would be even more baffling that he won't release them. It is clear there is something in there that he doesn't want us to see. Regardless, it is a complete waste of my time to continue this conversation.
I am open-minded - because of your comments ( which usually are very logical and thought provokingl)I went and looked up Romney's returns to see if I was wrong. I wasn't. As far as whether he cheats on his tax returns while I doubt simply looking at his tax returns would show that, the alternative of his IRS correspondence on audit adjustments could show that to a degree. You may be completely right it would have been better for him to just release his returns, but he doesn't seem to act in a way most politicians would , for better or worse. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by sir_eccles
(Post 12021782)
I'd check first. Looking at 538 this morning, AZ is now in play. Red states stay red because people don't vote.
|
Re: 2016 Election
This is an old story. My favorite part is where Trump photocopies his attorney's signature onto a tax return ---identifying the attorney as the tax preparer. When shown the document, in court, the attorney denies that he was the preparer. The original was never found.
Nothing to see here. New Evidence Donald Trump Didn’t Pay Taxes - The Daily Beast |
Re: 2016 Election
I wonder if Trump's investigators ever made it back from Hawaii. They've been over there for 5 or 6 years now ... I'm still waiting for their report about Obama's birth certificate.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by morpeth
(Post 12021785)
I am open-minded - because of your comments ( which usually are very logical and thought provokingl)I went and looked up Romney's returns to see if I was wrong. I wasn't.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 3:34 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.