![]() |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
(Post 11891637)
I was only going to check in after the general, but looked in to see the drift of the debate now that it's a 4-man race on the R side and that Bernie took Michigan. If the regulars would avoid using ad hominem attacks I might stop by more often.
Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
(Post 11891637)
By the way, I am not now, nor have I ever been, themadpooper. I gather themadpooper is somewhat right of centre?
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
(Post 11891637)
I was only going to check in after the general, but looked in to see the drift of the debate now that it's a 4-man race on the R side and that Bernie took Michigan. If the regulars would avoid using ad hominem attacks I might stop by more often.
By the way, I am not now, nor have I ever been, themadpooper. I gather themadpooper is somewhat right of centre? |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by sir_eccles
(Post 11891608)
They pay sales tax etc and drive a lot of the local economy.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by dakota44
(Post 11891617)
Trump the habitual liar was on full display in his speech in Florida. He had a table of alledged Trump products to respond to Romneys attack on his failures. So let us look. Trump Winery which he said he owns 100% debt free. Except this appears at the bottom of the legal disclaimer. Trump winery is not owned by or affiliated with Donald J. Trump. Interesting...especially since he was using it to defend failed Trump Vodka.
He had what he said were Trump Steaks...which were not but which came from the company he buys steak from for his hotels. Trump steaks no longer exist. He had Trump water..actually bottled by a non Trump company that he buys branded water from for his hotels and casinos. He held up what he called Trump magazine but it was an annual magazine for his golf club...Trump magazine has been gone for years. He is the ballsiest liar ever...about things easily proven false. So the question becomes how stupid do his supporters really have to be to vote for a man from whom such obvious lies flow. Not one thing the arrogant ass says can be trusted. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 11891650)
Is it truly ad hominem? I mean, we freely attack the candidates, but who cares about them? I am struggling to think of a time when a poster has actually been personally attacked, rather than just challenged, albeit in an animated way.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Giantaxe
(Post 11891668)
The Economist had an investigative piece on Trump's businesses a week or two ago. Their conclusion was that he had done worse than if he'd invested his dad's money in the stockmarket or existing NYC real estate.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Giantaxe
(Post 11891668)
The Economist had an investigative piece on Trump's businesses a week or two ago. Their conclusion was that he had done worse than if he'd invested his dad's money in the stockmarket or existing NYC real estate.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
(Post 11891723)
To be fair to Trump, that's probably not a fair comparison, on a lot of levels. The guy made money and I won't begrudge him that.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by dakota44
(Post 11891743)
The clown had to be bailed out by the banks back when was developing some properties...half a billion under water...was put on a monthly allowance by the banks and was allowed to continue the projects because the banks thougt they would recover more of their money with completed projects. That is not success. Most of his money is made by selling his name because many of his businesses go bust. Bankrupting Trump Casino 4 times is not success. Bilking people out of money for failed projects he endorsed and put his name to but had nothing to do with..is not success. Being bailed out by the Chinese is not success. He has been ridiculously lucky to have had his ass saved many times.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 11891745)
But it's OK, he's rich. He can get away with. As for us plebs, get behind on your student loans, who is going to bail us out?
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by dakota44
(Post 11891743)
The clown had to be bailed out by the banks back when was developing some properties...half a billion under water...was put on a monthly allowance by the banks and was allowed to continue the projects because the banks thougt they would recover more of their money with completed projects. That is not success. Most of his money is made by selling his name because many of his businesses go bust. Bankrupting Trump Casino 4 times is not success. Bilking people out of money for failed projects he endorsed and put his name to but had nothing to do with..is not success. Being bailed out by the Chinese is not success. He has been ridiculously lucky to have had his ass saved many times.
Real estate is heavily leveraged, so bankruptcy is a tool for dealing with the mortgage debt when the deal goes bad. That isn't comparable to stock investments that don't employ the use of so much debt. In any case, he bet heavily on Atlantic City, which proved to be a bad idea but made some sense. A lot of money gets made or lost on betting on redevelopment. You should be thankful that risk capital gets deployed in these places, otherwise we would have a lot more blight. |
Re: 2016 Election
I do no not WANT to hate him. I DO hate him. By the way, more violence against peaceful protesters at his recent rallies...with racial slurs added. He has encouraged this kind of behaviour which is now spreading to the streets. I can only imagine how bad it will get if he is elected. He has handed a license to people to commit violent acts out of racial hatred.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by dakota44
(Post 11891764)
I do no not WANT to hate him. I DO hate him. By the way, more violence against peaceful protesters at his recent rallies...with racial slurs added. He has encouraged this kind of behaviour which is now spreading to the streets.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
(Post 11891766)
OK, but that has nothing to do with real estate deals and how they work.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by dakota44
(Post 11891773)
Neither do his numerous failures...Trump Air, Vodka, Steaks, Magazine, Mortgage, Travel, University and the list goes on. He is basically a con man to be honest. Also most of the buildings he has his name on...he had nothing to do with the development...just licensed his name.
For example, if you look at venture capital, it's probably fair to say that out of every hundred deals, fifty or so are complete losers, another forty are mediocre, and only ten are truly successful. And of the ten, you will get the occasional Google that is an out-of-the-park home run. But you don't ever get to Google without also getting the other ninety-nine. Dismissing a VC investor for being an idiot because most of the deals are dogs misses the point. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:45 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.