Re: Wimbledon
Originally Posted by Autonomy
(Post 12288865)
Late reply - I don't bet so no idea on odds etc and now the tournament has started probably not great odds.
But now Wawrinka is out I'd have thought he was the only one out of the Big 4 that had a chance of winning. My money would be on Federer to win with Murray 2nd favourite. I'd love to see Federer win it again. |
Re: Wimbledon
Originally Posted by nottmbantam
(Post 12286488)
Not really a betting man, but fancy Nadal for this one.
|
Re: Wimbledon
Originally Posted by Miss Ann Thrope
(Post 12286828)
Unless he can actually get Dr. Marques on court injecting his funny stuff directly into his legs I'd say his knees will be gone by week two and after a strong start he'll crash out to a low ranker...
|
Re: Wimbledon
Originally Posted by Miss Ann Thrope
(Post 12291753)
Ahem. Since we're quoting ourselves and all....
|
Re: Wimbledon
So this makes Murray's march to the final a bit easier seeing as Nadal was on his side of the draw?
Konta to face Williams in the semi, commentators wetting their pants about a Brit woman doing well which is madness when you think how long (1978) it's been since a Wimbledon womens semi finalist was a Brit. I hadn't heard of her though... Googled her.... Classic 'Brit', would fit in well in the old Strauss cricket side. Hungarian parents, born in Sydney, used to 'play' for Australia until given a British passport. The Empire was good for something eh. |
Re: Wimbledon
Originally Posted by Scamp
(Post 12292306)
So this makes Murray's march to the final a bit easier seeing as Nadal was on his side of the draw?
I hadn't heard of her though... Googled her.... Classic 'Brit', would fit in well in the old Strauss cricket side. Hungarian parents, born in Sydney, used to 'play' for Australia until given a British passport. The Empire was good for something eh. |
Re: Wimbledon
Originally Posted by Autonomy
(Post 12292324)
Meh - all a bit Daily Mail sentiment there.
|
Re: Wimbledon
Originally Posted by Scamp
(Post 12292331)
I was actually being positive about it. Grateful that people want to play for Britain and that we have the reach to attract these people. It's a good thing..... You know, upside, optimistic, upbeat, encouraging, constructive etc. But don't let that get in the way of stereotyping or having a pop or gently reminding the entire world you look down on it with disgust.
Great she is representing Great Britain but in my eyes she is not British. Same as rugby players such as Ben Teo. Someone like Chris Froome is different as he has British parents. |
Re: Wimbledon
Originally Posted by Scamp
(Post 12292331)
I was actually being positive about it. Grateful that people want to play for Britain and that we have the reach to attract these people. It's a good thing..... You know, upside, optimistic, upbeat, encouraging, constructive etc. But don't let that get in the way of stereotyping or having a pop or gently reminding the entire world you look down on it with disgust.
Though - if I happen to disagree with a comment doesn't mean that I am stereotyping, having a pop or "gently reminding the entire world you look down on it with disgust" - As far as I am aware I am allowed an opinion and I'm allowed to state it on this forum. Perhaps you can stop having a pop at me everytime I post? |
Re: Wimbledon
Originally Posted by Inselaffen
(Post 12292346)
I don't think she had any particular attachment to the UK. Was purely financial. She left Oz because her funding was cut.
Great she is representing Great Britain but in my eyes she is not British. Same as rugby players such as Ben Teo. Someone like Chris Froome is different as he has British parents. |
Re: Wimbledon
Originally Posted by Autonomy
(Post 12292397)
Though - if I happen to disagree with a comment doesn't mean that I am stereotyping, having a pop or "gently reminding the entire world you look down on it with disgust" - As far as I am aware I am allowed an opinion and I'm allowed to state it on this forum.
Perhaps you can stop having a pop at me everytime I post? I started this thread deliberately for you :( |
Re: Wimbledon
Never would have thought she was a Aussie, listening to her speak. Ever so posh, BBC announcers probably want to speak like her. Innit.
|
Re: Wimbledon
Originally Posted by nottmbantam
(Post 12292499)
Never would have thought she was a Aussie, listening to her speak. Ever so posh, BBC announcers probably want to speak like her. Innit.
|
Re: Wimbledon
Originally Posted by Autonomy
(Post 12288865)
Late reply - I don't bet so no idea on odds etc and now the tournament has started probably not great odds.
But now Wawrinka is out I'd have thought he was the only one out of the Big 4 that had a chance of winning. My money would be on Federer to win with Murray 2nd favourite. |
Re: Wimbledon
Originally Posted by Inselaffen
(Post 12292346)
I don't think she had any particular attachment to the UK. Was purely financial. She left Oz because her funding was cut.
Great she is representing Great Britain but in my eyes she is not British. Same as rugby players such as Ben Teo. Someone like Chris Froome is different as he has British parents. You have confused your self here. Teo has an English mother, Nathan Hughes on the other hand didn't play for fiji and waited for citizenship, because 1 international game was 500quid for fiji, and for England its 25,000. For the record she is not British in anyway, its kind of embarrassing celebrating her success as a British athlete. And my favorite Big Mo will be done for doping soon :rofl: |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:25 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.