Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > Middle East > The Sand Pit
Reload this Page >

Saudi preacher gets light sentence for killing daughter

Saudi preacher gets light sentence for killing daughter

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 23rd 2013, 4:58 pm
  #121  
MODERATOR
 
Norm_uk's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: Dubai
Posts: 6,373
Norm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Saudi preacher gets light sentence for killing daughter

Originally Posted by redShark
The same rhetoric, historical inaccuracies, mammoth exaggerations, and ill conclusions, as ever. Far more journalistic in nature than they are academic. In fact, very much similar to what one would read when one looks at the other end of the stick, to the so called the radical Muslims. They reiterate a similar kind of perceptions and talk the same language about the west and the western history.
I was once listening to one of those guys giving a speech about what the Crusaders had done when they went into Jerusalem after laying a long siege to the city, he went:

“According to western sources, in less than one week 30,000 Muslim men, women and children were slayed. But when Saladin retook the city back from the Crusaders 70 years later, he forgave them all and set them free to go home”

So far, what this guy has just said is actually the truth. The problem, however, was when he went on to draw his conclusions when he said:

“Those two different acts do not actually surprise me a bit , because in the Bible the word sword was mentioned 407 times, while in the Quran the word sword was mentioned zero times” (those figures are actually true)

Unfortunately, In such dialogues, where HATE is the order of the day, the main victim is always the objectivity

Though it’s very tempting for me to respond and highlight the errors ( the historical and the otherwise) in your reply, I am not, however, going to do so because this discussion can go on for ever. At the end of the day it all depends on how you wish to view the glass; either half full or half empty.

And, yes this thread has been driven off topic big time, which goes to remind me of the good old technique of politicians: ‘if you are cornered with a question, dodge the issue to get out of trouble’
I am sure there will be more opportunities to catch up in future posts, , but for now its better that I disengage with you and sail away
Saladin ransomed off the inhabitants of Jerusalem actually...those who couldn't pay were enslaved.

You've brought up quite a few things in response then declined to give specific reasons why. This all started because you challenged my assertion that the English have been in England longer than the Arabs have been in most of the middle east (bar their heartlands of course). I provided dates for the Saxon conquest of Britain and showed that they pre-dated the Arabs rise and expansion around the middle east by a few centuries. We then started this tit for tat and you've been decent enough to reply to exact points once, I have replied in turn and invited you to join me in a new thread as we're way off topic in this one....you've declined to do that so that's the end of it.

It's a pity that whenever facts that are contrary to your beliefs come up it's alluded that hate is the reason rather than simple polemics. No surprise to me at all really. But thanks for being reasonable and polite - that's a lot more than some on these boards.

N.
Norm_uk is offline  
Old Feb 23rd 2013, 5:02 pm
  #122  
MODERATOR
 
Norm_uk's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: Dubai
Posts: 6,373
Norm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Saudi preacher gets light sentence for killing daughter

Originally Posted by shiva
Qur’an:9:88 – “The Messenger and those who believe with him, strive hard and fight with their wealth and lives in Allah’s Cause.”

Qur’an:9:5 - “Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, harass them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war.”

Qur’an:9:112 “The Believers fight in Allah’s Cause, they slay and are slain, kill and are killed.”

Qur’an:9:29 “Fight those who do not believe until they all surrender, paying the protective tax in submission.”

Qur’an:8:39 “Fight them until all opposition ends and all submit to Allah.”

Qur’an:8:39 “So fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief [non-Muslims]) and all submit to the religion of Allah alone (in the whole world).”

Ishaq:587 “Our onslaught will not be a weak faltering affair. We shall fight as long as we live. We will fight until you turn to Islam, humbly seeking refuge. We will fight not caring whom we meet. We will fight whether we destroy ancient holdings or newly gotten gains. We have mutilated every opponent. We have driven them violently before us at the command of Allah and Islam. We will fight until our religion is established. And we will plunder them, for they must suffer disgrace.”

Qur’an:8:65 “O Prophet, urge the faithful to fight. If there are twenty among you with determination they will vanquish two hundred; if there are a hundred then they will slaughter a thousand unbelievers, for the infidels are a people devoid of understanding.”

Qur’an:9:123 “Fight the unbelievers around you, and let them find harshness in you.”

Ishaq:578 “Crushing the heads of the infidels and splitting their skulls with sharp swords, we continually thrust and cut at the enemy. Blood gushed from their deep wounds as the battle wore them down. We conquered bearing the Prophet’s fluttering war banner. Our cavalry was submerged in rising dust, and our spears quivered, but by us the Prophet gained victory.”
The problem with this is that the faithful (and some of their unwitting supporters) will reply that you have to be able to read Arabic to truly understand this (as if it's the only language that cannot be translated well) or that you need to spend years within the belief under a 'proper' scholar....which of course is nonsense but that's the false reasoning they need to defend the undefendable.

There's also recompense to legal action in their jurisdictions or good old fashion threats and murder (following the example the most perfect man).

Anyway I'll let someone else call you racist this time

N.
Norm_uk is offline  
Old Feb 24th 2013, 3:35 am
  #123  
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,107
Miss Anne Thrope is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Saudi preacher gets light sentence for killing daughter

Originally Posted by shiva
Qur’an:9:88 – “The Messenger and those who believe with him, strive hard and fight with their wealth and lives in Allah’s Cause.”

Qur’an:9:5 - “Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, harass them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war.”

Qur’an:9:112 “The Believers fight in Allah’s Cause, they slay and are slain, kill and are killed.”

Qur’an:9:29 “Fight those who do not believe until they all surrender, paying the protective tax in submission.”

Qur’an:8:39 “Fight them until all opposition ends and all submit to Allah.”

Qur’an:8:39 “So fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief [non-Muslims]) and all submit to the religion of Allah alone (in the whole world).”

Ishaq:587 “Our onslaught will not be a weak faltering affair. We shall fight as long as we live. We will fight until you turn to Islam, humbly seeking refuge. We will fight not caring whom we meet. We will fight whether we destroy ancient holdings or newly gotten gains. We have mutilated every opponent. We have driven them violently before us at the command of Allah and Islam. We will fight until our religion is established. And we will plunder them, for they must suffer disgrace.”

Qur’an:8:65 “O Prophet, urge the faithful to fight. If there are twenty among you with determination they will vanquish two hundred; if there are a hundred then they will slaughter a thousand unbelievers, for the infidels are a people devoid of understanding.”

Qur’an:9:123 “Fight the unbelievers around you, and let them find harshness in you.”

Ishaq:578 “Crushing the heads of the infidels and splitting their skulls with sharp swords, we continually thrust and cut at the enemy. Blood gushed from their deep wounds as the battle wore them down. We conquered bearing the Prophet’s fluttering war banner. Our cavalry was submerged in rising dust, and our spears quivered, but by us the Prophet gained victory.”
I'm not going to defend the turgid piece of medieval political propaganda that is the Qu'ran but this is pretty gratuitous out-of-context quoting. Among the many reasons to severely question a book which was supposedly to provide God's words for all time is why it was so pre-occupied with specific conflicts of the time which are minor in the sweep of history. The bloodthirsty quotes above all relate to actions sanctioned in very specific conflicts and/or based on conditions about the behaviours of the opponents (there is a particular obsession with pagan Arabs on the Jazeera). It is extremely misleading to suggest that they represent the general teaching of Islam. This is easily illustrated by the relative tolerance - for the time- shown to other religions and practice by most of the early caliphates (the Umayyads in Cordoba being the shining example of course). Again, I point that out not to defend this particular cult but in the interests of truth and accuracy.

Last edited by Miss Anne Thrope; Feb 24th 2013 at 3:39 am.
Miss Anne Thrope is offline  
Old Feb 24th 2013, 7:57 am
  #124  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 691
redShark is a name known to allredShark is a name known to allredShark is a name known to allredShark is a name known to allredShark is a name known to allredShark is a name known to allredShark is a name known to allredShark is a name known to allredShark is a name known to allredShark is a name known to allredShark is a name known to all
Default Re: Saudi preacher gets light sentence for killing daughter

Originally Posted by shiva
Qur’an:9:88 – “The Messenger and those who believe with him, strive hard and fight with their wealth and lives in Allah’s Cause.”

Qur’an:9:5 - “Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, harass them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war.”

Qur’an:9:112 “The Believers fight in Allah’s Cause, they slay and are slain, kill and are killed.”

Qur’an:9:29 “Fight those who do not believe until they all surrender, paying the protective tax in submission.”

Qur’an:8:39 “Fight them until all opposition ends and all submit to Allah.”

Qur’an:8:39 “So fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief [non-Muslims]) and all submit to the religion of Allah alone (in the whole world).”

Ishaq:587 “Our onslaught will not be a weak faltering affair. We shall fight as long as we live. We will fight until you turn to Islam, humbly seeking refuge. We will fight not caring whom we meet. We will fight whether we destroy ancient holdings or newly gotten gains. We have mutilated every opponent. We have driven them violently before us at the command of Allah and Islam. We will fight until our religion is established. And we will plunder them, for they must suffer disgrace.”

Qur’an:8:65 “O Prophet, urge the faithful to fight. If there are twenty among you with determination they will vanquish two hundred; if there are a hundred then they will slaughter a thousand unbelievers, for the infidels are a people devoid of understanding.”

Qur’an:9:123 “Fight the unbelievers around you, and let them find harshness in you.”

Ishaq:578 “Crushing the heads of the infidels and splitting their skulls with sharp swords, we continually thrust and cut at the enemy. Blood gushed from their deep wounds as the battle wore them down. We conquered bearing the Prophet’s fluttering war banner. Our cavalry was submerged in rising dust, and our spears quivered, but by us the Prophet gained victory.”


First, the point was about the number of times the word sword was mentioned in the Quran, you failed to quote one!!
Second, all you did was to pick up parts of some versus from the Quran and quote them out of context. Those amputated sentences you quoted describe some wars when the Madenia city was continuously under attack by hostile armies. Had you written the full verse you would have then seen the full meaning. For example, You did not quote the next following verse that says “and if they seek peace then immediately stop all hostilities and escort them to safety. If you have read the early history of Islam you would have understood that right from the first day of the revelation up until the last day of the prophet’s life The whole of Arabia was at war with this small Muslim community.
Let me run this experiment with you just to highlight to you how outrageous your errors are :
If I was to tell you that there was a man in history who said the followings:

[we shall fight on the seas and oceans,
we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength
whatever the cost may be,
we shall fight on the beaches,
we shall fight on the landing grounds,
we shall fight in the fields and in the streets,
we shall fight in the hills]

Without me telling you who said those statements and what the context was , your first impression would be that those words could only come from a blood thirsty terrorist. But if I was to tell you that those were the very words of Sir Winston Churchill in one of his speeches when Britain was at war and under massive attacks, you would then begin to understand the context because the whole meanings become different.

And who is Ishaq??? I suppose you mean Ibn_Ishaq, the author who wrote a book on interpretation of Quran, what is this has to do with the main idea, after all, Hitler established his own Reich church with priests producing interpretations of the Bible in view of Nazi ideologies!!!
redShark is offline  
Old Feb 24th 2013, 8:11 am
  #125  
Shark Fisherman
 
britexpat76's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Location: Doha
Posts: 4,568
britexpat76 has a reputation beyond reputebritexpat76 has a reputation beyond reputebritexpat76 has a reputation beyond reputebritexpat76 has a reputation beyond reputebritexpat76 has a reputation beyond reputebritexpat76 has a reputation beyond reputebritexpat76 has a reputation beyond reputebritexpat76 has a reputation beyond reputebritexpat76 has a reputation beyond reputebritexpat76 has a reputation beyond reputebritexpat76 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Saudi preacher gets light sentence for killing daughter

Originally Posted by redShark
First, the point was about the number of times the word sword was mentioned in the Quran, you failed to quote one!!
Second, all you did was to pick up parts of some versus from the Quran and quote them out of context. Those amputated sentences you quoted describe some wars when the Madenia city was continuously under attack by hostile armies. Had you written the full verse you would have then seen the full meaning. For example, You did not quote the next following verse that says “and if they seek peace then immediately stop all hostilities and escort them to safety. If you have read the early history of Islam you would have understood that right from the first day of the revelation up until the last day of the prophet’s life The whole of Arabia was at war with this small Muslim community.
Let me run this experiment with you just to highlight to you how outrageous your errors are :
If I was to tell you that there was a man in history who said the followings:

[we shall fight on the seas and oceans,
we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength
whatever the cost may be,
we shall fight on the beaches,
we shall fight on the landing grounds,
we shall fight in the fields and in the streets,
we shall fight in the hills]

Without me telling you who said those statements and what the context was , your first impression would be that those words could only come from a blood thirsty terrorist. But if I was to tell you that those were the very words of Sir Winston Churchill in one of his speeches when Britain was at war and under massive attacks, you would then begin to understand the context because the whole meanings become different.

And who is Ishaq??? I suppose you mean Ibn_Ishaq, the author who wrote a book on interpretation of Quran, what is this has to do with the main idea, after all, Hitler established his own Reich church with priests producing interpretations of the Bible in view of Nazi ideologies!!!
You are comparing eggs with bollocks there. We do not live our lives by the words of Winston Churchill. He also does not mention the words, Slain, Killed, mutilation..............Can we please stick to biblical figures for accuracy.
britexpat76 is offline  
Old Feb 24th 2013, 10:43 am
  #126  
MODERATOR
 
Norm_uk's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: Dubai
Posts: 6,373
Norm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Saudi preacher gets light sentence for killing daughter

Originally Posted by Miss Anne Thrope
I'm not going to defend the turgid piece of medieval political propaganda that is the Qu'ran but this is pretty gratuitous out-of-context quoting. Among the many reasons to severely question a book which was supposedly to provide God's words for all time is why it was so pre-occupied with specific conflicts of the time which are minor in the sweep of history. The bloodthirsty quotes above all relate to actions sanctioned in very specific conflicts and/or based on conditions about the behaviours of the opponents (there is a particular obsession with pagan Arabs on the Jazeera). It is extremely misleading to suggest that they represent the general teaching of Islam. This is easily illustrated by the relative tolerance - for the time- shown to other religions and practice by most of the early caliphates (the Umayyads in Cordoba being the shining example of course). Again, I point that out not to defend this particular cult but in the interests of truth and accuracy.
This whole argument hangs on if you apply abrogation or not. And the fact remains that there are significant portions of Muslims around the world who do follow these verses. Right or wrong context, this bodes problems for their neighbours...and this is not a new thing. It started when they conquered what are now 28 countries within 30 years of the prophet dying. It's also not like their founder was a pacifist - he ordered men to war, to take slaves and spoils and had his detractors killed.

It's also pre-medieval as was fairly enlightened for it's day but still doesn't compare to Buddha, Christ or Confucius...who all pre-date it by centuries.

N.

Last edited by Norm_uk; Feb 24th 2013 at 10:49 am.
Norm_uk is offline  
Old Feb 24th 2013, 10:44 am
  #127  
MODERATOR
 
Norm_uk's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: Dubai
Posts: 6,373
Norm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Saudi preacher gets light sentence for killing daughter

Originally Posted by britexpat76
You are comparing eggs with bollocks there. We do not live our lives by the words of Winston Churchill. He also does not mention the words, Slain, Killed, mutilation..............Can we please stick to biblical figures for accuracy.
Churchill did write a scathing piece on Islamic society after his stint in the Sudan in the late 1800s. I won't post it here as I don't want to go to jail (which tells us everything about the system when it proscribes punishment for criticism).

N.
Norm_uk is offline  
Old Feb 24th 2013, 11:42 am
  #128  
**** it we'll do it live
Thread Starter
 
shiva's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: Dubai
Posts: 7,892
shiva has a reputation beyond reputeshiva has a reputation beyond reputeshiva has a reputation beyond reputeshiva has a reputation beyond reputeshiva has a reputation beyond reputeshiva has a reputation beyond reputeshiva has a reputation beyond reputeshiva has a reputation beyond reputeshiva has a reputation beyond reputeshiva has a reputation beyond reputeshiva has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Saudi preacher gets light sentence for killing daughter

Originally Posted by redShark
First, the point was about the number of times the word sword was mentioned in the Quran, you failed to quote one!!
Second, all you did was to pick up parts of some versus from the Quran and quote them out of context. Those amputated sentences you quoted describe some wars when the Madenia city was continuously under attack by hostile armies. Had you written the full verse you would have then seen the full meaning. For example, You did not quote the next following verse that says “and if they seek peace then immediately stop all hostilities and escort them to safety. If you have read the early history of Islam you would have understood that right from the first day of the revelation up until the last day of the prophet’s life The whole of Arabia was at war with this small Muslim community.
Let me run this experiment with you just to highlight to you how outrageous your errors are :
If I was to tell you that there was a man in history who said the followings:

[we shall fight on the seas and oceans,
we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength
whatever the cost may be,
we shall fight on the beaches,
we shall fight on the landing grounds,
we shall fight in the fields and in the streets,
we shall fight in the hills]

Without me telling you who said those statements and what the context was , your first impression would be that those words could only come from a blood thirsty terrorist. But if I was to tell you that those were the very words of Sir Winston Churchill in one of his speeches when Britain was at war and under massive attacks, you would then begin to understand the context because the whole meanings become different.

And who is Ishaq??? I suppose you mean Ibn_Ishaq, the author who wrote a book on interpretation of Quran, what is this has to do with the main idea, after all, Hitler established his own Reich church with priests producing interpretations of the Bible in view of Nazi ideologies!!!
you threw some ridiculous remark out there about the word sword, implying that the koran was all love and peace because there is no mention of sword.

All i was doing here was pointing out how glaringly ****ing ridiculous that was.

as for out of context, we hear that again and again along with religion of peace etc and yet the voice of moderate islam is still unheard.

your knowledge of history is as indoctrinated as your knowledge of the koran. I shall bow out of this one as i really cant be bothered wasting my time this time. normally id be more than happy to pile in but frankly i cant be arsed.

and before you accuse me of being anti islam, I'm not, i'm really not. i am equally against all religions and the suppression of thought
shiva is offline  
Old Feb 24th 2013, 11:50 am
  #129  
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,107
Miss Anne Thrope is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Saudi preacher gets light sentence for killing daughter

Originally Posted by Norm_uk
This whole argument hangs on if you apply abrogation or not. And the fact remains that there are significant portions of Muslims around the world who do follow these verses. Right or wrong context, this bodes problems for their neighbours...and this is not a new thing. It started when they conquered what are now 28 countries within 30 years of the prophet dying. It's also not like their founder was a pacifist - he ordered men to war, to take slaves and spoils and had his detractors killed.

It's also pre-medieval as was fairly enlightened for it's day but still doesn't compare to Buddha, Christ or Confucius...who all pre-date it by centuries.

N.
Plenty of Christians and Jews (including some with significant power and influence, particularly in the US) subscribe to bible/Torah literalism. Leviticus offers a particularly nice code for modern living.
Miss Anne Thrope is offline  
Old Feb 24th 2013, 12:02 pm
  #130  
Bored liberal
 
Meow's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Over there ----->
Posts: 13,713
Meow has a reputation beyond reputeMeow has a reputation beyond reputeMeow has a reputation beyond reputeMeow has a reputation beyond reputeMeow has a reputation beyond reputeMeow has a reputation beyond reputeMeow has a reputation beyond reputeMeow has a reputation beyond reputeMeow has a reputation beyond reputeMeow has a reputation beyond reputeMeow has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Saudi preacher gets light sentence for killing daughter

Originally Posted by Miss Anne Thrope
Plenty of Christians and Jews (including some with significant power and influence, particularly in the US) subscribe to bible/Torah literalism. Leviticus offers a particularly nice code for modern living.
Leviticus is special. If anyone ever needs reminding why the bible is not relevant to modern life, they only need to have a read. It's almost comedic.
Meow is offline  
Old Feb 26th 2013, 3:49 am
  #131  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: May 2011
Location: Dubai
Posts: 379
Maxima has a reputation beyond reputeMaxima has a reputation beyond reputeMaxima has a reputation beyond reputeMaxima has a reputation beyond reputeMaxima has a reputation beyond reputeMaxima has a reputation beyond reputeMaxima has a reputation beyond reputeMaxima has a reputation beyond reputeMaxima has a reputation beyond reputeMaxima has a reputation beyond reputeMaxima has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Saudi preacher gets light sentence for killing daughter

KSA is apparently stuck in the middle ages, bit what about places supposedly otherwise ?

http://www.thenational.ae/news/uae-n...-maid-to-death


A S beat her Ethiopian helper with the cord of a hair dryer, put pepper in her eyes and poured hot water over her for several days before she died, said the Emirati’s daughter.

The aunt of the Ethiopian woman appeared in the Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance yesterday to say the family would accept blood money and a year’s salary owed to her niece in exchange for a more lenient sentence
Maxima is offline  
Old Feb 26th 2013, 6:10 am
  #132  
MODERATOR
 
Norm_uk's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: Dubai
Posts: 6,373
Norm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond reputeNorm_uk has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Saudi preacher gets light sentence for killing daughter

Originally Posted by Miss Anne Thrope
Plenty of Christians and Jews (including some with significant power and influence, particularly in the US) subscribe to bible/Torah literalism. Leviticus offers a particularly nice code for modern living.
You're completely changing the subject and attempting to divert the facts I posted by bringing up other beliefs which are not the same at all.

I don't know many Jews who stone people, practice polygamy or kill their children if they are disobedient. Most Jews I have met aren't even religious.

As for Christians, well a literal following of Christ's teachings wouldn't be so bad (love your neighbours and your enemies etc). It's when they cherry pick things from the Old Testament to justify their own hate that it becomes a problem from what I can see. Jesus clearly stated his kingdom was not of this world...plenty of room for separation of church state there. I would question if they are really Christians in any meaningful sense.

Would you care to address what I actually posted or do you want to delve into the merits of literally follower Judaism or Christianity?

N.
Norm_uk is offline  
Old Feb 26th 2013, 6:15 am
  #133  
Excess Baggage
 
littlejimmy's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,479
littlejimmy has a reputation beyond reputelittlejimmy has a reputation beyond reputelittlejimmy has a reputation beyond reputelittlejimmy has a reputation beyond reputelittlejimmy has a reputation beyond reputelittlejimmy has a reputation beyond reputelittlejimmy has a reputation beyond reputelittlejimmy has a reputation beyond reputelittlejimmy has a reputation beyond reputelittlejimmy has a reputation beyond reputelittlejimmy has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Saudi preacher gets light sentence for killing daughter

Originally Posted by Norm_uk
You're completely changing the subject and attempting to divert the facts I posted by bringing up other beliefs which are not the same at all.

I don't know many Jews who stone people, practice polygamy or kill their children if they are disobedient. Most Jews I have met aren't even religious.

As for Christians, well a literal following of Christ's teachings wouldn't be so bad (love your neighbours and your enemies etc). It's when they cherry pick things from the Old Testament to justify their own hate that it becomes a problem from what I can see. Jesus clearly stated his kingdom was not of this world...plenty of room for separation of church state there. I would question if they are really Christians in any meaningful sense.

Would you care to address what I actually posted or do you want to delve into the merits of literally follower Judaism or Christianity?

N.
I'm interested to hear your view on religion and atheism in war, as mentioned on the other thread.
littlejimmy is offline  
Old Feb 26th 2013, 7:20 am
  #134  
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,107
Miss Anne Thrope is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Saudi preacher gets light sentence for killing daughter

Originally Posted by Norm_uk
You're completely changing the subject and attempting to divert the facts I posted by bringing up other beliefs which are not the same at all.

I don't know many Jews who stone people, practice polygamy or kill their children if they are disobedient. Most Jews I have met aren't even religious.

As for Christians, well a literal following of Christ's teachings wouldn't be so bad (love your neighbours and your enemies etc). It's when they cherry pick things from the Old Testament to justify their own hate that it becomes a problem from what I can see. Jesus clearly stated his kingdom was not of this world...plenty of room for separation of church state there. I would question if they are really Christians in any meaningful sense.

Would you care to address what I actually posted or do you want to delve into the merits of literally follower Judaism or Christianity?

N.
So your point is that there are fundamentalist muslims who are terrible people because they follow a twisted interpretation of their faith but we cannot equally judge those of other faiths who follow a similarly reductionist path? Is it, because if it's not then I can't untangle what you are saying at all.

And are you really making a general point about Jews based on those you know? What about the mushrooming orthodox sects in Israel? The militant West Bank settlers who are destroying local farms? The rabid anti-Arab racism that you can find on any Israeli forum? Have you not read about the little girls in Israel subjected to taunts of "whore" and even being stoned (yes, stoned) simply for going to school?

So yes, there are plenty of stupid evil fundamentalist muslims around but I see no reason why that should characterise all muslims any more than the hatemongers who are Jewish, Christian, Hindu, Buddhist (yes, there are plenty), Shinto or whatever.
Miss Anne Thrope is offline  
Old Feb 26th 2013, 12:01 pm
  #135  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 691
redShark is a name known to allredShark is a name known to allredShark is a name known to allredShark is a name known to allredShark is a name known to allredShark is a name known to allredShark is a name known to allredShark is a name known to allredShark is a name known to allredShark is a name known to allredShark is a name known to all
Default Re: Saudi preacher gets light sentence for killing daughter

Originally Posted by littlejimmy
I'm interested to hear your view on religion and atheism in war, as mentioned on the other thread.
I am equally amazed at his silence on the other thread.
redShark is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.