OVER 50's+ MOVING BACK TO THE UK - Part II
#4591
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,606
Re: OVER 50's & 60's MOVING BACK TO THE UK - Part II
I have wondered why they cannot put all theses people who have been on benefits all of their lives and really don't want to work cleaning the streets for their money. No work, no money. I notice the garbage especially when on the train going into Glasgow Central, it boggles the mind. Especially the houses that back onto the train lines, they just seem to throw all their not needed items down the bank, sickening, makes me very ashamed of being British, never thought I would say that.
But I think, what must tourists coming from overseas think when they get. here
But I think, what must tourists coming from overseas think when they get. here
Whatever happened to pride, why throw any trash down when you could take it home with you or throw it in a bin.
America does have trash by the roadside, local inmates crews in Oregon are made to clean it up, The Cities are very clean.
#4592
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,198
Re: OVER 50's & 60's MOVING BACK TO THE UK - Part II
Back in the 60s I was taught World History and World Geography in High School, and it's still taught as you point out above, Derrygal. My oldest daughter also took AP courses/exams which really helped her uni placement.
#4593
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,198
Re: OVER 50's & 60's MOVING BACK TO THE UK - Part II
#4594
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: Back home now in my home town in England U.K. after 36 years in U.S. now retired and loving it,
Posts: 3,208
Re: OVER 50's & 60's MOVING BACK TO THE UK - Part II
Lets remember distances are different in the UK than the US. Example, we go 250 miles round trip to the dentist in the US and I'm sure I would balk at driving 20 miles in the UK.
In answer, and if I can answer for Rod, yes 200 miles in the UK is a heck of a long way and it could put a lot of stress on his sister.
When I drive from Heathrow to Bristol it seems longer than driving from San Fransisco to LA. I can't explain it.
In answer, and if I can answer for Rod, yes 200 miles in the UK is a heck of a long way and it could put a lot of stress on his sister.
When I drive from Heathrow to Bristol it seems longer than driving from San Fransisco to LA. I can't explain it.
Cheers also mentioned the stress on my Sister, this is the problem, my Mum and I need to go together, Mum is not in terrific health anymore and a 200 mile car/coach/train journey really takes it out of her and wears her down, wouldn't be so bad if we could sleep overnight at my Sisters house like we used to do, My Sisters carer is her Son and he has become impossible to deal with and he will not allow anyone to stay overnight anymore, hes rather strange im afraid, so last time we did it all in one day, my Mum was exhausted and took her 3 days to get back to normal, she is 91 you know, when we can afford it we will book a night at a B&B but we would need three rooms, one for me, one for mum, and one for my Nephew and wife, and it can get really expensive,
#4595
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Aug 2009
Location: Back home now in my home town in England U.K. after 36 years in U.S. now retired and loving it,
Posts: 3,208
Re: OVER 50's & 60's MOVING BACK TO THE UK - Part II
Virgin Atlantic to launch a new route.
Virgin Atlantic, 51 per cent owned by Branson and 49 per cent by Singapore Airlines, is also launching a new route between Manchester and Las Vegas
Read more: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/...#ixzz1GQ8PdqOe
Virgin Atlantic, 51 per cent owned by Branson and 49 per cent by Singapore Airlines, is also launching a new route between Manchester and Las Vegas
Read more: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/...#ixzz1GQ8PdqOe
#4596
Re: OVER 50's & 60's MOVING BACK TO THE UK - Part II
Windsong.. So am I. I think you really need to look at education in the UK. The US is vast and I know many poorer areas have bad education and I have always said they need more help I believe it has to do with towns giving the money to the schools instead of the State .
If you want the truth my kids would knock spots of some of their conterparts in the UK with regard to what they know. They dont drink and they dont smoke like many young people in the UK. But I am being unfare when I say that, I am making an assumption that all kids in the Uk are dumb and smoke and drink.
School in the Uk has changed I listen to my neice moan about it. She managed to get her youngest into a private school because she didnt want him to go to the local school. Rotten teachers and no control Could have been anywhere in the US. This is a worldwide problem not just associated with one country.
If you want the truth my kids would knock spots of some of their conterparts in the UK with regard to what they know. They dont drink and they dont smoke like many young people in the UK. But I am being unfare when I say that, I am making an assumption that all kids in the Uk are dumb and smoke and drink.
School in the Uk has changed I listen to my neice moan about it. She managed to get her youngest into a private school because she didnt want him to go to the local school. Rotten teachers and no control Could have been anywhere in the US. This is a worldwide problem not just associated with one country.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandsty...hool-interview
(Where's the yawn smiley when you need it?)
#4598
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: Tunbridge Wells KENT
Posts: 2,914
Re: OVER 50's & 60's MOVING BACK TO THE UK - Part II
I'm sure things will improve now that Jamie is coming to the rescue:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandsty...hool-interview
(Where's the yawn smiley when you need it?)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandsty...hool-interview
(Where's the yawn smiley when you need it?)
I was interested to see that a number of universities are thinking of setting their own examinations as they simply aren't satisfied that A levels are a good enough measure of the quality of candidates to provide their desired supply of good undergraduates. What is more, employers are ever moaning that there are no quality candidates at interview time as well, as universities are churning out graduates who are often incapable of putting forward a reasoned argument on a given topic.
Last edited by Pistolpete2; Mar 13th 2011 at 12:22 pm.
#4599
Just Joined
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 20
Re: OVER 50's & 60's MOVING BACK TO THE UK - Part II
Julie xo
#4600
Re: OVER 50's & 60's MOVING BACK TO THE UK - Part II
Dunroving what is your impression of the damage that has been done to the State Education System in the UK as a result of the endless tinkering with it, in terms of overall political strategy, setting of targets, examinations, top-up fees and the need to maintain a supply of quality teachers etc .etc?
I was interested to see that a number of universities are thinking of setting their own examinations as they simply aren't satisfied that A levels are a good enough measure of the quality of candidates to provide their desired supply of good undergraduates. What is more, employers are ever moaning that there are no quality candidates at interview time as well, as universities are churning out graduates who are often incapable of putting forward a reasoned argument on a given topic.
I was interested to see that a number of universities are thinking of setting their own examinations as they simply aren't satisfied that A levels are a good enough measure of the quality of candidates to provide their desired supply of good undergraduates. What is more, employers are ever moaning that there are no quality candidates at interview time as well, as universities are churning out graduates who are often incapable of putting forward a reasoned argument on a given topic.
Interesting commentary by AA Gill on Jamie's Dream School program in last week's Sunday Times Culture magazine (books/TV, etc.), referring to the problems in UK education that have crept in over the past 10-20 years, and the fakeness of Jamie's premise of supposedly being able to do what teachers can't do, simply by bunging a load of money, celebrities and fancy activities. To paraphrase:
Huge classes
Lack of cash
A restrictive and relentless national curriculum
Round-the-clock OFSTED form-filling
Inspections, forms, tests, health and safety
... in fact, some of the celebrities brought in to work miracles on a bunch of 20 children who had poor GCSE results highlighted how out of touch celebs are with the realities of coal-face teaching. You can't, for example, crack jokes about a fat kid (as David Starkey did). And you can't just take kids sailing (and anyway, how does this tie in with studying hard?)
I see the outcomes of a Narcissist-focused philosophy (never say work is not satisfactory; praise everything) of latter-day teaching in current university students. Appalling writing skills, lack of basic knowledge in maths and science, poor work ethic, etc., matched with a sense of entitlement without merit and an inflated sense of ability.
To be clear, I have taught (from primary school to university and community education) for over 30 years and love the job. I'd never want to go back to the days when teachers could give kids the slipper, and boring "chalk and talk" was the norm, but I think the term "student-centred" is applied only to rights and wants, and not student responsibilities. The opinions I am writing here are not even "allowed" in today's PC-obsessed culture. I don't live in a fantasy world, I live in the real world.
OK, rant over. You did ask. There are some good schools and some good teachers, and good students with good parents will still succeed, but in general current standards of UK education are not the same as they were when some of our current posters were in school.
#4601
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: Tunbridge Wells KENT
Posts: 2,914
Re: OVER 50's & 60's MOVING BACK TO THE UK - Part II
Oh, blimey, don't get me started ... OK, in brief:
Interesting commentary by AA Gill on Jamie's Dream School program in last week's Sunday Times Culture magazine (books/TV, etc.), referring to the problems in UK education that have crept in over the past 10-20 years, and the fakeness of Jamie's premise of supposedly being able to do what teachers can't do, simply by bunging a load of money, celebrities and fancy activities. To paraphrase:
Huge classes
Lack of cash
A restrictive and relentless national curriculum
Round-the-clock OFSTED form-filling
Inspections, forms, tests, health and safety
... in fact, some of the celebrities brought in to work miracles on a bunch of 20 children who had poor GCSE results highlighted how out of touch celebs are with the realities of coal-face teaching. You can't, for example, crack jokes about a fat kid (as David Starkey did). And you can't just take kids sailing (and anyway, how does this tie in with studying hard?)
I see the outcomes of a Narcissist-focused philosophy (never say work is not satisfactory; praise everything) of latter-day teaching in current university students. Appalling writing skills, lack of basic knowledge in maths and science, poor work ethic, etc., matched with a sense of entitlement without merit and an inflated sense of ability.
To be clear, I have taught (from primary school to university and community education) for over 30 years and love the job. I'd never want to go back to the days when teachers could give kids the slipper, and boring "chalk and talk" was the norm, but I think the term "student-centred" is applied only to rights and wants, and not student responsibilities. The opinions I am writing here are not even "allowed" in today's PC-obsessed culture. I don't live in a fantasy world, I live in the real world.
OK, rant over. You did ask. There are some good schools and some good teachers, and good students with good parents will still succeed, but in general current standards of UK education are not the same as they were when some of our current posters were in school.
Interesting commentary by AA Gill on Jamie's Dream School program in last week's Sunday Times Culture magazine (books/TV, etc.), referring to the problems in UK education that have crept in over the past 10-20 years, and the fakeness of Jamie's premise of supposedly being able to do what teachers can't do, simply by bunging a load of money, celebrities and fancy activities. To paraphrase:
Huge classes
Lack of cash
A restrictive and relentless national curriculum
Round-the-clock OFSTED form-filling
Inspections, forms, tests, health and safety
... in fact, some of the celebrities brought in to work miracles on a bunch of 20 children who had poor GCSE results highlighted how out of touch celebs are with the realities of coal-face teaching. You can't, for example, crack jokes about a fat kid (as David Starkey did). And you can't just take kids sailing (and anyway, how does this tie in with studying hard?)
I see the outcomes of a Narcissist-focused philosophy (never say work is not satisfactory; praise everything) of latter-day teaching in current university students. Appalling writing skills, lack of basic knowledge in maths and science, poor work ethic, etc., matched with a sense of entitlement without merit and an inflated sense of ability.
To be clear, I have taught (from primary school to university and community education) for over 30 years and love the job. I'd never want to go back to the days when teachers could give kids the slipper, and boring "chalk and talk" was the norm, but I think the term "student-centred" is applied only to rights and wants, and not student responsibilities. The opinions I am writing here are not even "allowed" in today's PC-obsessed culture. I don't live in a fantasy world, I live in the real world.
OK, rant over. You did ask. There are some good schools and some good teachers, and good students with good parents will still succeed, but in general current standards of UK education are not the same as they were when some of our current posters were in school.
I'm trying to make choices as we still have one school-age kid (and I'm sixty next week ) who would be due to consider tertiary education in four years or so. I have one who has a good MA at Glasgow and an MSc there who is a waiter at the moment for want of anything in his chosen field which is City & Regional Planning in spite of more than usual action north of the border. So I'm doubly apprehensive.
I'm sorry I can't get hold of AA Gill online for this one as it's subscription. He's a harsh reviewer though, when he's in a good frame of mind.
Last edited by Pistolpete2; Mar 13th 2011 at 1:37 pm.
#4602
Re: OVER 50's & 60's MOVING BACK TO THE UK - Part II
Thanks for that! I'll need to take your points "on board' but there's nothing there that surprises me greatly or I have not already been aware of, particularly in your "I see the outcome....." paragraph.
I'm trying to make choices as we still have one school-age kid (and I'm sixty next week ) who would be due to consider tertiary education in four years or so. I have one who has a good MA at Glasgow and an MSc there who is a waiter at the moment for want of anything in his chosen field which is City & Regional Planning in spite of more than usual action north of the border. So I'm doubly apprehensive.
I'm sorry I can't get hold of AA Gill online for this one as it's subscription. He's a harsh reviewer though, when he's in a good frame of mind.
I'm trying to make choices as we still have one school-age kid (and I'm sixty next week ) who would be due to consider tertiary education in four years or so. I have one who has a good MA at Glasgow and an MSc there who is a waiter at the moment for want of anything in his chosen field which is City & Regional Planning in spite of more than usual action north of the border. So I'm doubly apprehensive.
I'm sorry I can't get hold of AA Gill online for this one as it's subscription. He's a harsh reviewer though, when he's in a good frame of mind.
#4603
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: Tunbridge Wells KENT
Posts: 2,914
Re: OVER 50's & 60's MOVING BACK TO THE UK - Part II
Heh! I've been bitching and moaning about the never say work is not satisfactory; praise everything approach for days! I'm glad I can be backed up with solid research.
#4604
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,197
Re: OVER 50's & 60's MOVING BACK TO THE UK - Part II
A trend in parenting as well as in education...in the end, kids see through it--if you praise everything they do, even when they themselves know they didn't try very hard, they can't have confidence in your judgement and it doesn't mean anything.
We were so lucky in our public high school in a small town in the USA, it just happened that there were a few crucial and brilliant teachers with high standards teaching the honors classes...
Tina
#4605
Re: OVER 50's & 60's MOVING BACK TO THE UK - Part II
I have actually been asked to change a comment of "unsatisfactory" on a section of an assignment to "not yet satisfactory".