Danish scientist: Global warming is a myth
Mar 17th 2007, 7:36 pm
#46
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Danish scientist: Global warming is a myth
On 18/03/07 0:46, in article
[email protected] om, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> This is shown
> graphicallyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Recent_Sea_Level_Rise.png
>>
>> an part of wikipedia article
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
>>
>> Geologically, the rise started
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:P..._Sea_Level.png
>> from the depth of the last ice age, 18,000 years ago, suddenly
>> became greater 14,000 years ago and more or less leveled
>> of 8000 years ago.
>>
>> The total rise from 18000 year ago to now is about 130-140
>> meters. The rise since 1900 is about 20 cm. The worst
>> case scenarios are unlikely to happen in the near future
>> (a 7 meter rise due to a total meltdown of Greenland)
>> but the rise of a meter or so is not "unthinkable"
>> A number of populated islands will be submerged in that
>> case, low lying levels will be inundated, particular
>> with the combined effect of storm surging.
>
>
> Indeed Frenchie: you are just as 'off base' as
> Jacques Chirac, who soon will have to answer for
> his many crimes.
I am American! And a scientist. Sea rise levels have
nothing to do with Chirac!
>
> Wikipedia is not a reliable source other than
> for births and deaths, etc. As for Science,
> fffuuuuuuugggggeetttabboutit. <G>
Wikipedia science is pretty good and the reference the source
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Volume 163, Issues 1-4 , November 1998, Pages 327-342
[email protected] om, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> This is shown
> graphicallyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Recent_Sea_Level_Rise.png
>>
>> an part of wikipedia article
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
>>
>> Geologically, the rise started
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:P..._Sea_Level.png
>> from the depth of the last ice age, 18,000 years ago, suddenly
>> became greater 14,000 years ago and more or less leveled
>> of 8000 years ago.
>>
>> The total rise from 18000 year ago to now is about 130-140
>> meters. The rise since 1900 is about 20 cm. The worst
>> case scenarios are unlikely to happen in the near future
>> (a 7 meter rise due to a total meltdown of Greenland)
>> but the rise of a meter or so is not "unthinkable"
>> A number of populated islands will be submerged in that
>> case, low lying levels will be inundated, particular
>> with the combined effect of storm surging.
>
>
> Indeed Frenchie: you are just as 'off base' as
> Jacques Chirac, who soon will have to answer for
> his many crimes.
I am American! And a scientist. Sea rise levels have
nothing to do with Chirac!
>
> Wikipedia is not a reliable source other than
> for births and deaths, etc. As for Science,
> fffuuuuuuugggggeetttabboutit. <G>
Wikipedia science is pretty good and the reference the source
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Volume 163, Issues 1-4 , November 1998, Pages 327-342
Mar 17th 2007, 11:35 pm
#47
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Danish scientist: Global warming is a myth
Make credence recognised that on 17 Mar 2007 14:07:14 -0700,
"InTheNorthLand" <[email protected]> has scripted:
>> Just because it's become a political issue, doesn't immediately
>> make it all fiction.
>
> Nor does it make it credible.
With that type of reasoning, I'll exit at this point.
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--
"InTheNorthLand" <[email protected]> has scripted:
>> Just because it's become a political issue, doesn't immediately
>> make it all fiction.
>
> Nor does it make it credible.
With that type of reasoning, I'll exit at this point.
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--
Mar 17th 2007, 11:38 pm
#48
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Danish scientist: Global warming is a myth
Make credence recognised that on 17 Mar 2007 17:13:14 -0700,
[email protected] has scripted:
>On Mar 16, 8:11 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>> Make credence recognised that on 15 Mar 2007 15:17:29 -0700, "Jerry
>> Kraus" <[email protected]> has scripted:
>>
>>
>> >Correct. Global Warming is an environmentalist myth/religion given
>> >credibility by ambitious and unscrupulous scientists and politicians.
>>
>> Ummm... no, it's real. And please wipe your chin after talking shit.
>
> It appears that the Deeply Shit Filled Mortician
> is either brain dead or under the spell of
> ambitious and unscrupulous scientists and
> politicians, Gore brand, that is.
I'm still waiting for any evidence that global warming isn't happening
to counteract the large amount that says it is.
You guys seem to think it can't be true if the president doesn't
endorse it.
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--
[email protected] has scripted:
>On Mar 16, 8:11 am, Deeply Filled Mortician
><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote:
>> Make credence recognised that on 15 Mar 2007 15:17:29 -0700, "Jerry
>> Kraus" <[email protected]> has scripted:
>>
>>
>> >Correct. Global Warming is an environmentalist myth/religion given
>> >credibility by ambitious and unscrupulous scientists and politicians.
>>
>> Ummm... no, it's real. And please wipe your chin after talking shit.
>
> It appears that the Deeply Shit Filled Mortician
> is either brain dead or under the spell of
> ambitious and unscrupulous scientists and
> politicians, Gore brand, that is.
I'm still waiting for any evidence that global warming isn't happening
to counteract the large amount that says it is.
You guys seem to think it can't be true if the president doesn't
endorse it.
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--
Mar 18th 2007, 12:16 am
#49
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT: Re: Danish scientist: Global warming is a myth
On Mar 15, 6:15 pm, "Earl Evleth" <[email protected]> wrote:
> COPENHAGEN, Denmark, March 15 (UPI) -- A Danish scientist said the
> idea of a "global temperature" and global warming is more political
> than scientific.
>
> University of Copenhagen Professor Bjarne Andresen has analyzed the
> topic in collaboration with Canadian Professors Christopher Essex from
> the University of Western Ontario and Ross McKitrick of the University
> of Guelph.
>
> It is generally assumed the Earth's atmosphere and oceans have grown
> warmer during the recent 50 years because of an upward trend in the so-
> called global temperature, which is the result of complex calculations
> and averaging of air temperature measurements taken around the world.
>
> "It is impossible to talk about a single temperature for something as
> complicated as the climate of Earth," said Andresen, an expert on
> thermodynamics. "A temperature can be defined only for a homogeneous
> system. Furthermore, the climate is not governed by a single
> temperature. Rather, differences of temperatures drive the processes
> and create the storms, sea currents, thunder, etc. which make up the
> climate".
>
> He says the currently used method of determining the global
> temperature -- and any conclusion drawn from it -- is more political
> than scientific.
Use "OT:" in subjects for this crap.
> COPENHAGEN, Denmark, March 15 (UPI) -- A Danish scientist said the
> idea of a "global temperature" and global warming is more political
> than scientific.
>
> University of Copenhagen Professor Bjarne Andresen has analyzed the
> topic in collaboration with Canadian Professors Christopher Essex from
> the University of Western Ontario and Ross McKitrick of the University
> of Guelph.
>
> It is generally assumed the Earth's atmosphere and oceans have grown
> warmer during the recent 50 years because of an upward trend in the so-
> called global temperature, which is the result of complex calculations
> and averaging of air temperature measurements taken around the world.
>
> "It is impossible to talk about a single temperature for something as
> complicated as the climate of Earth," said Andresen, an expert on
> thermodynamics. "A temperature can be defined only for a homogeneous
> system. Furthermore, the climate is not governed by a single
> temperature. Rather, differences of temperatures drive the processes
> and create the storms, sea currents, thunder, etc. which make up the
> climate".
>
> He says the currently used method of determining the global
> temperature -- and any conclusion drawn from it -- is more political
> than scientific.
Use "OT:" in subjects for this crap.
Mar 18th 2007, 2:33 am
#50
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Danish scientist: Global warming is a myth
On Mar 18, 3:36 am, Earl Evleth <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 18/03/07 0:46, in article
> [email protected] om, "[email protected]"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > This is shown
> > graphicallyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Recent_Sea_Level_Rise.png
>
> >> an part of wikipedia article
>
> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
>
> >> Geologically, the rise started
>
> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:P..._Sea_Level.png
> >> from the depth of the last ice age, 18,000 years ago, suddenly
> >> became greater 14,000 years ago and more or less leveled
> >> of 8000 years ago.
>
> >> The total rise from 18000 year ago to now is about 130-140
> >> meters. The rise since 1900 is about 20 cm. The worst
> >> case scenarios are unlikely to happen in the near future
> >> (a 7 meter rise due to a total meltdown of Greenland)
> >> but the rise of a meter or so is not "unthinkable"
> >> A number of populated islands will be submerged in that
> >> case, low lying levels will be inundated, particular
> >> with the combined effect of storm surging.
>
> > Indeed Frenchie: you are just as 'off base' as
> > Jacques Chirac, who soon will have to answer for
> > his many crimes.
>
> I am American!
So what are you doing in France?
> And a scientist.
There are hundreds of science disciplines but few
geophysicists and related disciplines. Of those
few, even less are au courant, today.
> Sea rise levels have
> nothing to do with Chirac!
>
>
>
> > Wikipedia is not a reliable source other than
> > for births and deaths, etc. As for Science,
> > fffuuuuuuugggggeetttabboutit. <G>
>
> Wikipedia science is pretty good and
Dream on!!! <G>
> the reference the source
> Earth and Planetary Science Letters
> Volume 163, Issues 1-4 , November 1998, Pages 327-342
The old part reads fine but anything 100 years
old or less is redundant.
> On 18/03/07 0:46, in article
> [email protected] om, "[email protected]"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > This is shown
> > graphicallyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Recent_Sea_Level_Rise.png
>
> >> an part of wikipedia article
>
> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
>
> >> Geologically, the rise started
>
> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:P..._Sea_Level.png
> >> from the depth of the last ice age, 18,000 years ago, suddenly
> >> became greater 14,000 years ago and more or less leveled
> >> of 8000 years ago.
>
> >> The total rise from 18000 year ago to now is about 130-140
> >> meters. The rise since 1900 is about 20 cm. The worst
> >> case scenarios are unlikely to happen in the near future
> >> (a 7 meter rise due to a total meltdown of Greenland)
> >> but the rise of a meter or so is not "unthinkable"
> >> A number of populated islands will be submerged in that
> >> case, low lying levels will be inundated, particular
> >> with the combined effect of storm surging.
>
> > Indeed Frenchie: you are just as 'off base' as
> > Jacques Chirac, who soon will have to answer for
> > his many crimes.
>
> I am American!
So what are you doing in France?
> And a scientist.
There are hundreds of science disciplines but few
geophysicists and related disciplines. Of those
few, even less are au courant, today.
> Sea rise levels have
> nothing to do with Chirac!
>
>
>
> > Wikipedia is not a reliable source other than
> > for births and deaths, etc. As for Science,
> > fffuuuuuuugggggeetttabboutit. <G>
>
> Wikipedia science is pretty good and
Dream on!!! <G>
> the reference the source
> Earth and Planetary Science Letters
> Volume 163, Issues 1-4 , November 1998, Pages 327-342
The old part reads fine but anything 100 years
old or less is redundant.
Mar 18th 2007, 2:37 am
#51
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT: Re: Danish scientist: Global warming is a myth
On Mar 18, 10:33 am, [email protected] wrote:
> On Mar 18, 3:36 am, Earl Evleth <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 18/03/07 0:46, in article
> > [email protected] om, "[email protected]"
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > This is shown
> > > graphicallyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Recent_Sea_Level_Rise.png
>
> > >> an part of wikipedia article
>
> > >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
>
> > >> Geologically, the rise started
>
> > >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:P..._Sea_Level.png
> > >> from the depth of the last ice age, 18,000 years ago, suddenly
> > >> became greater 14,000 years ago and more or less leveled
> > >> of 8000 years ago.
>
> > >> The total rise from 18000 year ago to now is about 130-140
> > >> meters. The rise since 1900 is about 20 cm. The worst
> > >> case scenarios are unlikely to happen in the near future
> > >> (a 7 meter rise due to a total meltdown of Greenland)
> > >> but the rise of a meter or so is not "unthinkable"
> > >> A number of populated islands will be submerged in that
> > >> case, low lying levels will be inundated, particular
> > >> with the combined effect of storm surging.
>
> > > Indeed Frenchie: you are just as 'off base' as
> > > Jacques Chirac, who soon will have to answer for
> > > his many crimes.
>
> > I am American!
>
> So what are you doing in France?
>
> > And a scientist.
>
> There are hundreds of science disciplines but few
> geophysicists and related disciplines. Of those
> few, even less are au courant, today.
>
> > Sea rise levels have
> > nothing to do with Chirac!
>
> > > Wikipedia is not a reliable source other than
> > > for births and deaths, etc. As for Science,
> > > fffuuuuuuugggggeetttabboutit. <G>
>
> > Wikipedia science is pretty good and
>
> Dream on!!! <G>
>
> > the reference the source
> > Earth and Planetary Science Letters
> > Volume 163, Issues 1-4 , November 1998, Pages 327-342
>
> The old part reads fine but anything 100 years
> old or less is redundant.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Use "OT:" in subjects for this crap, or remove all non-political
groups from the "Newsgroups:" list.
Ed S.
> On Mar 18, 3:36 am, Earl Evleth <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 18/03/07 0:46, in article
> > [email protected] om, "[email protected]"
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > This is shown
> > > graphicallyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Recent_Sea_Level_Rise.png
>
> > >> an part of wikipedia article
>
> > >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
>
> > >> Geologically, the rise started
>
> > >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:P..._Sea_Level.png
> > >> from the depth of the last ice age, 18,000 years ago, suddenly
> > >> became greater 14,000 years ago and more or less leveled
> > >> of 8000 years ago.
>
> > >> The total rise from 18000 year ago to now is about 130-140
> > >> meters. The rise since 1900 is about 20 cm. The worst
> > >> case scenarios are unlikely to happen in the near future
> > >> (a 7 meter rise due to a total meltdown of Greenland)
> > >> but the rise of a meter or so is not "unthinkable"
> > >> A number of populated islands will be submerged in that
> > >> case, low lying levels will be inundated, particular
> > >> with the combined effect of storm surging.
>
> > > Indeed Frenchie: you are just as 'off base' as
> > > Jacques Chirac, who soon will have to answer for
> > > his many crimes.
>
> > I am American!
>
> So what are you doing in France?
>
> > And a scientist.
>
> There are hundreds of science disciplines but few
> geophysicists and related disciplines. Of those
> few, even less are au courant, today.
>
> > Sea rise levels have
> > nothing to do with Chirac!
>
> > > Wikipedia is not a reliable source other than
> > > for births and deaths, etc. As for Science,
> > > fffuuuuuuugggggeetttabboutit. <G>
>
> > Wikipedia science is pretty good and
>
> Dream on!!! <G>
>
> > the reference the source
> > Earth and Planetary Science Letters
> > Volume 163, Issues 1-4 , November 1998, Pages 327-342
>
> The old part reads fine but anything 100 years
> old or less is redundant.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Use "OT:" in subjects for this crap, or remove all non-political
groups from the "Newsgroups:" list.
Ed S.
Mar 18th 2007, 4:07 am
#52
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Danish scientist: Global warming is a myth
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected] oups.com...
> On Mar 18, 3:36 am, Earl Evleth <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 18/03/07 0:46, in article
>> [email protected] om,
>> "[email protected]"
>
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > This is shown
>> > graphicallyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Recent_Sea_Level_Rise.png
>>
>> >> an part of wikipedia article
>>
>> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
>>
>> >> Geologically, the rise started
>>
>> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:P..._Sea_Level.png
>> >> from the depth of the last ice age, 18,000 years ago, suddenly
>> >> became greater 14,000 years ago and more or less leveled
>> >> of 8000 years ago.
>>
>> >> The total rise from 18000 year ago to now is about 130-140
>> >> meters. The rise since 1900 is about 20 cm. The worst
>> >> case scenarios are unlikely to happen in the near future
>> >> (a 7 meter rise due to a total meltdown of Greenland)
>> >> but the rise of a meter or so is not "unthinkable"
>> >> A number of populated islands will be submerged in that
>> >> case, low lying levels will be inundated, particular
>> >> with the combined effect of storm surging.
>>
>> > Indeed Frenchie: you are just as 'off base' as
>> > Jacques Chirac, who soon will have to answer for
>> > his many crimes.
>>
>> I am American!
>
> So what are you doing in France?
>
>> And a scientist.
>
> There are hundreds of science disciplines but few
> geophysicists and related disciplines. Of those
> few, even less are au courant, today.
>
>> Sea rise levels have
>> nothing to do with Chirac!
>>
>>
>>
>> > Wikipedia is not a reliable source other than
>> > for births and deaths, etc. As for Science,
>> > fffuuuuuuugggggeetttabboutit. <G>
>>
>> Wikipedia science is pretty good and
>
> Dream on!!! <G>
>
>> the reference the source
>> Earth and Planetary Science Letters
>> Volume 163, Issues 1-4 , November 1998, Pages 327-342
>
> The old part reads fine but anything 100 years
> old or less is redundant.
>
And, of course, the glaciers aren't melting nor is Artic ice vastly reduced
in size. I too get annoyed by global warming enthusiasts especially when
they combine their claims with anti-nuclear power protests but don't please
try and kid yourself: global warming is happening and, to put it at its
mildest, man's activities since he decided to turn the great forests of
Europe into charcoal have helped that warming.
news:[email protected] oups.com...
> On Mar 18, 3:36 am, Earl Evleth <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 18/03/07 0:46, in article
>> [email protected] om,
>> "[email protected]"
>
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > This is shown
>> > graphicallyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Recent_Sea_Level_Rise.png
>>
>> >> an part of wikipedia article
>>
>> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
>>
>> >> Geologically, the rise started
>>
>> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:P..._Sea_Level.png
>> >> from the depth of the last ice age, 18,000 years ago, suddenly
>> >> became greater 14,000 years ago and more or less leveled
>> >> of 8000 years ago.
>>
>> >> The total rise from 18000 year ago to now is about 130-140
>> >> meters. The rise since 1900 is about 20 cm. The worst
>> >> case scenarios are unlikely to happen in the near future
>> >> (a 7 meter rise due to a total meltdown of Greenland)
>> >> but the rise of a meter or so is not "unthinkable"
>> >> A number of populated islands will be submerged in that
>> >> case, low lying levels will be inundated, particular
>> >> with the combined effect of storm surging.
>>
>> > Indeed Frenchie: you are just as 'off base' as
>> > Jacques Chirac, who soon will have to answer for
>> > his many crimes.
>>
>> I am American!
>
> So what are you doing in France?
>
>> And a scientist.
>
> There are hundreds of science disciplines but few
> geophysicists and related disciplines. Of those
> few, even less are au courant, today.
>
>> Sea rise levels have
>> nothing to do with Chirac!
>>
>>
>>
>> > Wikipedia is not a reliable source other than
>> > for births and deaths, etc. As for Science,
>> > fffuuuuuuugggggeetttabboutit. <G>
>>
>> Wikipedia science is pretty good and
>
> Dream on!!! <G>
>
>> the reference the source
>> Earth and Planetary Science Letters
>> Volume 163, Issues 1-4 , November 1998, Pages 327-342
>
> The old part reads fine but anything 100 years
> old or less is redundant.
>
And, of course, the glaciers aren't melting nor is Artic ice vastly reduced
in size. I too get annoyed by global warming enthusiasts especially when
they combine their claims with anti-nuclear power protests but don't please
try and kid yourself: global warming is happening and, to put it at its
mildest, man's activities since he decided to turn the great forests of
Europe into charcoal have helped that warming.
Mar 18th 2007, 4:08 am
#53
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Danish scientist: Global warming is a myth
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected] oups.com...
> On Mar 18, 10:33 am, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Mar 18, 3:36 am, Earl Evleth <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 18/03/07 0:46, in article
>> > [email protected] om,
>> > "[email protected]"
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > This is shown
>> > > graphicallyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Recent_Sea_Level_Rise.png
>>
>> > >> an part of wikipedia article
>>
>> > >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
>>
>> > >> Geologically, the rise started
>>
>> > >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:P..._Sea_Level.png
>> > >> from the depth of the last ice age, 18,000 years ago, suddenly
>> > >> became greater 14,000 years ago and more or less leveled
>> > >> of 8000 years ago.
>>
>> > >> The total rise from 18000 year ago to now is about 130-140
>> > >> meters. The rise since 1900 is about 20 cm. The worst
>> > >> case scenarios are unlikely to happen in the near future
>> > >> (a 7 meter rise due to a total meltdown of Greenland)
>> > >> but the rise of a meter or so is not "unthinkable"
>> > >> A number of populated islands will be submerged in that
>> > >> case, low lying levels will be inundated, particular
>> > >> with the combined effect of storm surging.
>>
>> > > Indeed Frenchie: you are just as 'off base' as
>> > > Jacques Chirac, who soon will have to answer for
>> > > his many crimes.
>>
>> > I am American!
>>
>> So what are you doing in France?
>>
>> > And a scientist.
>>
>> There are hundreds of science disciplines but few
>> geophysicists and related disciplines. Of those
>> few, even less are au courant, today.
>>
>> > Sea rise levels have
>> > nothing to do with Chirac!
>>
>> > > Wikipedia is not a reliable source other than
>> > > for births and deaths, etc. As for Science,
>> > > fffuuuuuuugggggeetttabboutit. <G>
>>
>> > Wikipedia science is pretty good and
>>
>> Dream on!!! <G>
>>
>> > the reference the source
>> > Earth and Planetary Science Letters
>> > Volume 163, Issues 1-4 , November 1998, Pages 327-342
>>
>> The old part reads fine but anything 100 years
>> old or less is redundant.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Use "OT:" in subjects for this crap, or remove all non-political
> groups from the "Newsgroups:" list.
>
> Ed S.
>
Killfile the offenders and stop whining.
news:[email protected] oups.com...
> On Mar 18, 10:33 am, [email protected] wrote:
>> On Mar 18, 3:36 am, Earl Evleth <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 18/03/07 0:46, in article
>> > [email protected] om,
>> > "[email protected]"
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > This is shown
>> > > graphicallyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Recent_Sea_Level_Rise.png
>>
>> > >> an part of wikipedia article
>>
>> > >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
>>
>> > >> Geologically, the rise started
>>
>> > >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:P..._Sea_Level.png
>> > >> from the depth of the last ice age, 18,000 years ago, suddenly
>> > >> became greater 14,000 years ago and more or less leveled
>> > >> of 8000 years ago.
>>
>> > >> The total rise from 18000 year ago to now is about 130-140
>> > >> meters. The rise since 1900 is about 20 cm. The worst
>> > >> case scenarios are unlikely to happen in the near future
>> > >> (a 7 meter rise due to a total meltdown of Greenland)
>> > >> but the rise of a meter or so is not "unthinkable"
>> > >> A number of populated islands will be submerged in that
>> > >> case, low lying levels will be inundated, particular
>> > >> with the combined effect of storm surging.
>>
>> > > Indeed Frenchie: you are just as 'off base' as
>> > > Jacques Chirac, who soon will have to answer for
>> > > his many crimes.
>>
>> > I am American!
>>
>> So what are you doing in France?
>>
>> > And a scientist.
>>
>> There are hundreds of science disciplines but few
>> geophysicists and related disciplines. Of those
>> few, even less are au courant, today.
>>
>> > Sea rise levels have
>> > nothing to do with Chirac!
>>
>> > > Wikipedia is not a reliable source other than
>> > > for births and deaths, etc. As for Science,
>> > > fffuuuuuuugggggeetttabboutit. <G>
>>
>> > Wikipedia science is pretty good and
>>
>> Dream on!!! <G>
>>
>> > the reference the source
>> > Earth and Planetary Science Letters
>> > Volume 163, Issues 1-4 , November 1998, Pages 327-342
>>
>> The old part reads fine but anything 100 years
>> old or less is redundant.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Use "OT:" in subjects for this crap, or remove all non-political
> groups from the "Newsgroups:" list.
>
> Ed S.
>
Killfile the offenders and stop whining.
Mar 18th 2007, 4:14 am
#54
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Danish scientist: Global warming is a myth
"John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected] ...
>
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected] oups.com...
>> On Mar 18, 3:36 am, Earl Evleth <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On 18/03/07 0:46, in article
>>> [email protected] om,
>>> "[email protected]"
>>
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > This is shown
>>> > graphicallyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Recent_Sea_Level_Rise.png
>>>
>>> >> an part of wikipedia article
>>>
>>> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
>>>
>>> >> Geologically, the rise started
>>>
>>> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:P..._Sea_Level.png
>>> >> from the depth of the last ice age, 18,000 years ago, suddenly
>>> >> became greater 14,000 years ago and more or less leveled
>>> >> of 8000 years ago.
>>>
>>> >> The total rise from 18000 year ago to now is about 130-140
>>> >> meters. The rise since 1900 is about 20 cm. The worst
>>> >> case scenarios are unlikely to happen in the near future
>>> >> (a 7 meter rise due to a total meltdown of Greenland)
>>> >> but the rise of a meter or so is not "unthinkable"
>>> >> A number of populated islands will be submerged in that
>>> >> case, low lying levels will be inundated, particular
>>> >> with the combined effect of storm surging.
>>>
>>> > Indeed Frenchie: you are just as 'off base' as
>>> > Jacques Chirac, who soon will have to answer for
>>> > his many crimes.
>>>
>>> I am American!
>>
>> So what are you doing in France?
>>
>>> And a scientist.
>>
>> There are hundreds of science disciplines but few
>> geophysicists and related disciplines. Of those
>> few, even less are au courant, today.
>>
>>> Sea rise levels have
>>> nothing to do with Chirac!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > Wikipedia is not a reliable source other than
>>> > for births and deaths, etc. As for Science,
>>> > fffuuuuuuugggggeetttabboutit. <G>
>>>
>>> Wikipedia science is pretty good and
>>
>> Dream on!!! <G>
>>
>>> the reference the source
>>> Earth and Planetary Science Letters
>>> Volume 163, Issues 1-4 , November 1998, Pages 327-342
>>
>> The old part reads fine but anything 100 years
>> old or less is redundant.
>>
>
> And, of course, the glaciers aren't melting nor is Artic ice vastly
> reduced in size. I too get annoyed by global warming enthusiasts
> especially when they combine their claims with anti-nuclear power protests
> but don't please try and kid yourself: global warming is happening and, to
> put it at its mildest, man's activities since he decided to turn the great
> forests of Europe into charcoal have helped that warming.
>
NOT happening.
news:[email protected] ...
>
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected] oups.com...
>> On Mar 18, 3:36 am, Earl Evleth <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On 18/03/07 0:46, in article
>>> [email protected] om,
>>> "[email protected]"
>>
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > This is shown
>>> > graphicallyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Recent_Sea_Level_Rise.png
>>>
>>> >> an part of wikipedia article
>>>
>>> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
>>>
>>> >> Geologically, the rise started
>>>
>>> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:P..._Sea_Level.png
>>> >> from the depth of the last ice age, 18,000 years ago, suddenly
>>> >> became greater 14,000 years ago and more or less leveled
>>> >> of 8000 years ago.
>>>
>>> >> The total rise from 18000 year ago to now is about 130-140
>>> >> meters. The rise since 1900 is about 20 cm. The worst
>>> >> case scenarios are unlikely to happen in the near future
>>> >> (a 7 meter rise due to a total meltdown of Greenland)
>>> >> but the rise of a meter or so is not "unthinkable"
>>> >> A number of populated islands will be submerged in that
>>> >> case, low lying levels will be inundated, particular
>>> >> with the combined effect of storm surging.
>>>
>>> > Indeed Frenchie: you are just as 'off base' as
>>> > Jacques Chirac, who soon will have to answer for
>>> > his many crimes.
>>>
>>> I am American!
>>
>> So what are you doing in France?
>>
>>> And a scientist.
>>
>> There are hundreds of science disciplines but few
>> geophysicists and related disciplines. Of those
>> few, even less are au courant, today.
>>
>>> Sea rise levels have
>>> nothing to do with Chirac!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > Wikipedia is not a reliable source other than
>>> > for births and deaths, etc. As for Science,
>>> > fffuuuuuuugggggeetttabboutit. <G>
>>>
>>> Wikipedia science is pretty good and
>>
>> Dream on!!! <G>
>>
>>> the reference the source
>>> Earth and Planetary Science Letters
>>> Volume 163, Issues 1-4 , November 1998, Pages 327-342
>>
>> The old part reads fine but anything 100 years
>> old or less is redundant.
>>
>
> And, of course, the glaciers aren't melting nor is Artic ice vastly
> reduced in size. I too get annoyed by global warming enthusiasts
> especially when they combine their claims with anti-nuclear power protests
> but don't please try and kid yourself: global warming is happening and, to
> put it at its mildest, man's activities since he decided to turn the great
> forests of Europe into charcoal have helped that warming.
>
NOT happening.
Mar 18th 2007, 4:53 am
#55
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Danish scientist: Global warming is a myth
On Mar 18, 12:07 pm, "John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected] oups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Mar 18, 3:36 am, Earl Evleth <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On 18/03/07 0:46, in article
> >> [email protected] om,
> >> "[email protected]"
>
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > This is shown
> >> > graphicallyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Recent_Sea_Level_Rise.png
>
> >> >> an part of wikipedia article
>
> >> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
>
> >> >> Geologically, the rise started
>
> >> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:P..._Sea_Level.png
> >> >> from the depth of the last ice age, 18,000 years ago, suddenly
> >> >> became greater 14,000 years ago and more or less leveled
> >> >> of 8000 years ago.
>
> >> >> The total rise from 18000 year ago to now is about 130-140
> >> >> meters. The rise since 1900 is about 20 cm. The worst
> >> >> case scenarios are unlikely to happen in the near future
> >> >> (a 7 meter rise due to a total meltdown of Greenland)
> >> >> but the rise of a meter or so is not "unthinkable"
> >> >> A number of populated islands will be submerged in that
> >> >> case, low lying levels will be inundated, particular
> >> >> with the combined effect of storm surging.
>
> >> > Indeed Frenchie: you are just as 'off base' as
> >> > Jacques Chirac, who soon will have to answer for
> >> > his many crimes.
>
> >> I am American!
>
> > So what are you doing in France?
>
> >> And a scientist.
>
> > There are hundreds of science disciplines but few
> > geophysicists and related disciplines. Of those
> > few, even less are au courant, today.
>
> >> Sea rise levels have
> >> nothing to do with Chirac!
>
> >> > Wikipedia is not a reliable source other than
> >> > for births and deaths, etc. As for Science,
> >> > fffuuuuuuugggggeetttabboutit. <G>
>
> >> Wikipedia science is pretty good and
>
> > Dream on!!! <G>
>
> >> the reference the source
> >> Earth and Planetary Science Letters
> >> Volume 163, Issues 1-4 , November 1998, Pages 327-342
>
> > The old part reads fine but anything 100 years
> > old or less is redundant.
>
> And, of course, the glaciers aren't melting nor is Artic ice vastly reduced
> in size. I too get annoyed by global warming enthusiasts especially when
> they combine their claims with anti-nuclear power protests but don't please
> try and kid yourself: global warming is happening
Don't kid yourself, global warming happened!
Now the cool down in starting. Whether it will
be 20 years or 100 years, it is coming.
and, to put it at its
> mildest, man's activities since he decided to turn the great forests of
> Europe into charcoal have helped that warming.
Wrong again� two things have contributed greatly to the the high
CO2 levels in the atmosphere and it is not so called fossil fuels. The
world wide burning of the forests and the coverage of so much of the
soil with masonry, concrete and tar. Green plants take in CO2 and
emit
oxygen.
- -
Befuddled Gore keeps blathering about
how the oceans are being heated by
global warming, instead of the warming
being created by the oceans, as the facts
clearly show.
I am struck by the remarkable liberties Gore took to ?create a
scientific, historical, and political mythology.
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected] oups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Mar 18, 3:36 am, Earl Evleth <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On 18/03/07 0:46, in article
> >> [email protected] om,
> >> "[email protected]"
>
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > This is shown
> >> > graphicallyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Recent_Sea_Level_Rise.png
>
> >> >> an part of wikipedia article
>
> >> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
>
> >> >> Geologically, the rise started
>
> >> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:P..._Sea_Level.png
> >> >> from the depth of the last ice age, 18,000 years ago, suddenly
> >> >> became greater 14,000 years ago and more or less leveled
> >> >> of 8000 years ago.
>
> >> >> The total rise from 18000 year ago to now is about 130-140
> >> >> meters. The rise since 1900 is about 20 cm. The worst
> >> >> case scenarios are unlikely to happen in the near future
> >> >> (a 7 meter rise due to a total meltdown of Greenland)
> >> >> but the rise of a meter or so is not "unthinkable"
> >> >> A number of populated islands will be submerged in that
> >> >> case, low lying levels will be inundated, particular
> >> >> with the combined effect of storm surging.
>
> >> > Indeed Frenchie: you are just as 'off base' as
> >> > Jacques Chirac, who soon will have to answer for
> >> > his many crimes.
>
> >> I am American!
>
> > So what are you doing in France?
>
> >> And a scientist.
>
> > There are hundreds of science disciplines but few
> > geophysicists and related disciplines. Of those
> > few, even less are au courant, today.
>
> >> Sea rise levels have
> >> nothing to do with Chirac!
>
> >> > Wikipedia is not a reliable source other than
> >> > for births and deaths, etc. As for Science,
> >> > fffuuuuuuugggggeetttabboutit. <G>
>
> >> Wikipedia science is pretty good and
>
> > Dream on!!! <G>
>
> >> the reference the source
> >> Earth and Planetary Science Letters
> >> Volume 163, Issues 1-4 , November 1998, Pages 327-342
>
> > The old part reads fine but anything 100 years
> > old or less is redundant.
>
> And, of course, the glaciers aren't melting nor is Artic ice vastly reduced
> in size. I too get annoyed by global warming enthusiasts especially when
> they combine their claims with anti-nuclear power protests but don't please
> try and kid yourself: global warming is happening
Don't kid yourself, global warming happened!
Now the cool down in starting. Whether it will
be 20 years or 100 years, it is coming.
and, to put it at its
> mildest, man's activities since he decided to turn the great forests of
> Europe into charcoal have helped that warming.
Wrong again� two things have contributed greatly to the the high
CO2 levels in the atmosphere and it is not so called fossil fuels. The
world wide burning of the forests and the coverage of so much of the
soil with masonry, concrete and tar. Green plants take in CO2 and
emit
oxygen.
- -
Befuddled Gore keeps blathering about
how the oceans are being heated by
global warming, instead of the warming
being created by the oceans, as the facts
clearly show.
I am struck by the remarkable liberties Gore took to ?create a
scientific, historical, and political mythology.
Mar 18th 2007, 5:28 am
#56
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Danish scientist: Global warming is a myth
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected] oups.com...
On Mar 18, 12:07 pm, "John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected] oups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Mar 18, 3:36 am, Earl Evleth <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On 18/03/07 0:46, in article
> >> [email protected] om,
> >> "[email protected]"
>
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > This is shown
> >> > graphicallyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Recent_Sea_Level_Rise.png
>
> >> >> an part of wikipedia article
>
> >> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
>
> >> >> Geologically, the rise started
>
> >> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:P..._Sea_Level.png
> >> >> from the depth of the last ice age, 18,000 years ago, suddenly
> >> >> became greater 14,000 years ago and more or less leveled
> >> >> of 8000 years ago.
>
> >> >> The total rise from 18000 year ago to now is about 130-140
> >> >> meters. The rise since 1900 is about 20 cm. The worst
> >> >> case scenarios are unlikely to happen in the near future
> >> >> (a 7 meter rise due to a total meltdown of Greenland)
> >> >> but the rise of a meter or so is not "unthinkable"
> >> >> A number of populated islands will be submerged in that
> >> >> case, low lying levels will be inundated, particular
> >> >> with the combined effect of storm surging.
>
> >> > Indeed Frenchie: you are just as 'off base' as
> >> > Jacques Chirac, who soon will have to answer for
> >> > his many crimes.
>
> >> I am American!
>
> > So what are you doing in France?
>
> >> And a scientist.
>
> > There are hundreds of science disciplines but few
> > geophysicists and related disciplines. Of those
> > few, even less are au courant, today.
>
> >> Sea rise levels have
> >> nothing to do with Chirac!
>
> >> > Wikipedia is not a reliable source other than
> >> > for births and deaths, etc. As for Science,
> >> > fffuuuuuuugggggeetttabboutit. <G>
>
> >> Wikipedia science is pretty good and
>
> > Dream on!!! <G>
>
> >> the reference the source
> >> Earth and Planetary Science Letters
> >> Volume 163, Issues 1-4 , November 1998, Pages 327-342
>
> > The old part reads fine but anything 100 years
> > old or less is redundant.
>
> And, of course, the glaciers aren't melting nor is Artic ice vastly
> reduced
> in size. I too get annoyed by global warming enthusiasts especially when
> they combine their claims with anti-nuclear power protests but don't
> please
> try and kid yourself: global warming is happening
Don't kid yourself, global warming happened!
Now the cool down in starting.
So that's why the glaciers are now melting at an increasing pace and the
Artic ice is reducing. Because the earth is getting colder - hmmn!
Whether it will
be 20 years or 100 years, it is coming.
I agree. Cooling always follows warming. I just don't think it's
happening now
and, to put it at its
> mildest, man's activities since he decided to turn the great forests of
> Europe into charcoal have helped that warming.
Wrong again
Huh!
- two things have contributed greatly to the the high
CO2 levels in the atmosphere and it is not so called fossil fuels. The
world wide burning of the forests
You're in such a hurry that you failed to read what I posted. Why did man
burn forests? To produce charcoal . Where did I mention fossil fuels?
Nowhere!
and the coverage of so much of the
soil with masonry, concrete and tar. Green plants take in CO2 and
emit
oxygen.
- -
Befuddled Gore keeps blathering about
how the oceans are being heated by
global warming, instead of the warming
being created by the oceans, as the facts
clearly show.
You haven't quoted any sources for these 'facts'. Please do so
I am struck by the remarkable liberties Gore took to ?create a
scientific, historical, and political mythology.
news:[email protected] oups.com...
On Mar 18, 12:07 pm, "John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected] oups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Mar 18, 3:36 am, Earl Evleth <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On 18/03/07 0:46, in article
> >> [email protected] om,
> >> "[email protected]"
>
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > This is shown
> >> > graphicallyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Recent_Sea_Level_Rise.png
>
> >> >> an part of wikipedia article
>
> >> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
>
> >> >> Geologically, the rise started
>
> >> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:P..._Sea_Level.png
> >> >> from the depth of the last ice age, 18,000 years ago, suddenly
> >> >> became greater 14,000 years ago and more or less leveled
> >> >> of 8000 years ago.
>
> >> >> The total rise from 18000 year ago to now is about 130-140
> >> >> meters. The rise since 1900 is about 20 cm. The worst
> >> >> case scenarios are unlikely to happen in the near future
> >> >> (a 7 meter rise due to a total meltdown of Greenland)
> >> >> but the rise of a meter or so is not "unthinkable"
> >> >> A number of populated islands will be submerged in that
> >> >> case, low lying levels will be inundated, particular
> >> >> with the combined effect of storm surging.
>
> >> > Indeed Frenchie: you are just as 'off base' as
> >> > Jacques Chirac, who soon will have to answer for
> >> > his many crimes.
>
> >> I am American!
>
> > So what are you doing in France?
>
> >> And a scientist.
>
> > There are hundreds of science disciplines but few
> > geophysicists and related disciplines. Of those
> > few, even less are au courant, today.
>
> >> Sea rise levels have
> >> nothing to do with Chirac!
>
> >> > Wikipedia is not a reliable source other than
> >> > for births and deaths, etc. As for Science,
> >> > fffuuuuuuugggggeetttabboutit. <G>
>
> >> Wikipedia science is pretty good and
>
> > Dream on!!! <G>
>
> >> the reference the source
> >> Earth and Planetary Science Letters
> >> Volume 163, Issues 1-4 , November 1998, Pages 327-342
>
> > The old part reads fine but anything 100 years
> > old or less is redundant.
>
> And, of course, the glaciers aren't melting nor is Artic ice vastly
> reduced
> in size. I too get annoyed by global warming enthusiasts especially when
> they combine their claims with anti-nuclear power protests but don't
> please
> try and kid yourself: global warming is happening
Don't kid yourself, global warming happened!
Now the cool down in starting.
So that's why the glaciers are now melting at an increasing pace and the
Artic ice is reducing. Because the earth is getting colder - hmmn!
Whether it will
be 20 years or 100 years, it is coming.
I agree. Cooling always follows warming. I just don't think it's
happening now
and, to put it at its
> mildest, man's activities since he decided to turn the great forests of
> Europe into charcoal have helped that warming.
Wrong again
Huh!
- two things have contributed greatly to the the high
CO2 levels in the atmosphere and it is not so called fossil fuels. The
world wide burning of the forests
You're in such a hurry that you failed to read what I posted. Why did man
burn forests? To produce charcoal . Where did I mention fossil fuels?
Nowhere!
and the coverage of so much of the
soil with masonry, concrete and tar. Green plants take in CO2 and
emit
oxygen.
- -
Befuddled Gore keeps blathering about
how the oceans are being heated by
global warming, instead of the warming
being created by the oceans, as the facts
clearly show.
You haven't quoted any sources for these 'facts'. Please do so
I am struck by the remarkable liberties Gore took to ?create a
scientific, historical, and political mythology.
Mar 18th 2007, 6:25 am
#57
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Danish scientist: Global warming is a myth
On Mar 18, 1:28 pm, "John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected] oups.com...
> On Mar 18, 12:07 pm, "John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> >news:[email protected] roups.com...
>
> > > On Mar 18, 3:36 am, Earl Evleth <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> On 18/03/07 0:46, in article
> > >> [email protected] om,
> > >> "[email protected]"
>
> > >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> > This is shown
> > >> > graphicallyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Recent_Sea_Level_Rise.png
>
> > >> >> an part of wikipedia article
>
> > >> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
>
> > >> >> Geologically, the rise started
>
> > >> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:P..._Sea_Level.png
> > >> >> from the depth of the last ice age, 18,000 years ago, suddenly
> > >> >> became greater 14,000 years ago and more or less leveled
> > >> >> of 8000 years ago.
>
> > >> >> The total rise from 18000 year ago to now is about 130-140
> > >> >> meters. The rise since 1900 is about 20 cm. The worst
> > >> >> case scenarios are unlikely to happen in the near future
> > >> >> (a 7 meter rise due to a total meltdown of Greenland)
> > >> >> but the rise of a meter or so is not "unthinkable"
> > >> >> A number of populated islands will be submerged in that
> > >> >> case, low lying levels will be inundated, particular
> > >> >> with the combined effect of storm surging.
>
> > >> > Indeed Frenchie: you are just as 'off base' as
> > >> > Jacques Chirac, who soon will have to answer for
> > >> > his many crimes.
>
> > >> I am American!
>
> > > So what are you doing in France?
>
> > >> And a scientist.
>
> > > There are hundreds of science disciplines but few
> > > geophysicists and related disciplines. Of those
> > > few, even less are au courant, today.
>
> > >> Sea rise levels have
> > >> nothing to do with Chirac!
>
> > >> > Wikipedia is not a reliable source other than
> > >> > for births and deaths, etc. As for Science,
> > >> > fffuuuuuuugggggeetttabboutit. <G>
>
> > >> Wikipedia science is pretty good and
>
> > > Dream on!!! <G>
>
> > >> the reference the source
> > >> Earth and Planetary Science Letters
> > >> Volume 163, Issues 1-4 , November 1998, Pages 327-342
>
> > > The old part reads fine but anything 100 years
> > > old or less is redundant.
>
> > And, of course, the glaciers aren't melting nor is Artic ice vastly
> > reduced
> > in size. I too get annoyed by global warming enthusiasts especially when
> > they combine their claims with anti-nuclear power protests but don't
> > please
> > try and kid yourself: global warming is happening
>
> Don't kid yourself, global warming happened!
> Now the cool down in starting.
>
> So that's why the glaciers are now melting at an increasing pace and the
> Artic ice is reducing. Because the earth is getting colder - hmmn!
>
> Whether it will
> be 20 years or 100 years, it is coming.
>
> I agree. Cooling always follows warming. I just don't think it's
> happening now
>
> and, to put it at its
>
> > mildest, man's activities since he decided to turn the great forests of
> > Europe into charcoal have helped that warming.
>
> Wrong again
>
> Huh!
>
> - two things have contributed greatly to the the high
> CO2 levels in the atmosphere and it is not so called fossil fuels. The
> world wide destruction of the forests
>
> You're in such a hurry that you failed to read what I posted. Why did man
> burn forests? To produce charcoal .
There have been little industrial use of charcoal since WW II except
in the distillation of methyl hydrate and that is now obsolete
Where did I mention fossil fuels?
> Nowhere!
so what????
>
> and the coverage of so much of the
> soil with masonry, concrete and tar. Green plants take in CO2 and
> emit
> oxygen.
>
> - -
> Befuddled Gore keeps blathering about
> how the oceans are being heated by
> global warming, instead of the warming
> being created by the oceans, as the facts
> clearly show.
>
> You haven't quoted any sources for these 'facts'. Please do so
Two of us have posted that stuff a dozen times each. Since you did not
read it now you can google for it
>
> I am struck by the remarkable liberties Gore took to create a
> scientific, historical, and political mythology.
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected] oups.com...
> On Mar 18, 12:07 pm, "John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> >news:[email protected] roups.com...
>
> > > On Mar 18, 3:36 am, Earl Evleth <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> On 18/03/07 0:46, in article
> > >> [email protected] om,
> > >> "[email protected]"
>
> > >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> > This is shown
> > >> > graphicallyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Recent_Sea_Level_Rise.png
>
> > >> >> an part of wikipedia article
>
> > >> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level_rise
>
> > >> >> Geologically, the rise started
>
> > >> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:P..._Sea_Level.png
> > >> >> from the depth of the last ice age, 18,000 years ago, suddenly
> > >> >> became greater 14,000 years ago and more or less leveled
> > >> >> of 8000 years ago.
>
> > >> >> The total rise from 18000 year ago to now is about 130-140
> > >> >> meters. The rise since 1900 is about 20 cm. The worst
> > >> >> case scenarios are unlikely to happen in the near future
> > >> >> (a 7 meter rise due to a total meltdown of Greenland)
> > >> >> but the rise of a meter or so is not "unthinkable"
> > >> >> A number of populated islands will be submerged in that
> > >> >> case, low lying levels will be inundated, particular
> > >> >> with the combined effect of storm surging.
>
> > >> > Indeed Frenchie: you are just as 'off base' as
> > >> > Jacques Chirac, who soon will have to answer for
> > >> > his many crimes.
>
> > >> I am American!
>
> > > So what are you doing in France?
>
> > >> And a scientist.
>
> > > There are hundreds of science disciplines but few
> > > geophysicists and related disciplines. Of those
> > > few, even less are au courant, today.
>
> > >> Sea rise levels have
> > >> nothing to do with Chirac!
>
> > >> > Wikipedia is not a reliable source other than
> > >> > for births and deaths, etc. As for Science,
> > >> > fffuuuuuuugggggeetttabboutit. <G>
>
> > >> Wikipedia science is pretty good and
>
> > > Dream on!!! <G>
>
> > >> the reference the source
> > >> Earth and Planetary Science Letters
> > >> Volume 163, Issues 1-4 , November 1998, Pages 327-342
>
> > > The old part reads fine but anything 100 years
> > > old or less is redundant.
>
> > And, of course, the glaciers aren't melting nor is Artic ice vastly
> > reduced
> > in size. I too get annoyed by global warming enthusiasts especially when
> > they combine their claims with anti-nuclear power protests but don't
> > please
> > try and kid yourself: global warming is happening
>
> Don't kid yourself, global warming happened!
> Now the cool down in starting.
>
> So that's why the glaciers are now melting at an increasing pace and the
> Artic ice is reducing. Because the earth is getting colder - hmmn!
>
> Whether it will
> be 20 years or 100 years, it is coming.
>
> I agree. Cooling always follows warming. I just don't think it's
> happening now
>
> and, to put it at its
>
> > mildest, man's activities since he decided to turn the great forests of
> > Europe into charcoal have helped that warming.
>
> Wrong again
>
> Huh!
>
> - two things have contributed greatly to the the high
> CO2 levels in the atmosphere and it is not so called fossil fuels. The
> world wide destruction of the forests
>
> You're in such a hurry that you failed to read what I posted. Why did man
> burn forests? To produce charcoal .
There have been little industrial use of charcoal since WW II except
in the distillation of methyl hydrate and that is now obsolete
Where did I mention fossil fuels?
> Nowhere!
so what????
>
> and the coverage of so much of the
> soil with masonry, concrete and tar. Green plants take in CO2 and
> emit
> oxygen.
>
> - -
> Befuddled Gore keeps blathering about
> how the oceans are being heated by
> global warming, instead of the warming
> being created by the oceans, as the facts
> clearly show.
>
> You haven't quoted any sources for these 'facts'. Please do so
Two of us have posted that stuff a dozen times each. Since you did not
read it now you can google for it
>
> I am struck by the remarkable liberties Gore took to create a
> scientific, historical, and political mythology.
Mar 18th 2007, 8:25 am
#58
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Danish scientist: Global warming is a myth
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected] oups.com...
>>
>> I agree. Cooling always follows warming. I just don't think it's
>> happening now
>>
>> and, to put it at its
>>
>> > mildest, man's activities since he decided to turn the great forests of
>> > Europe into charcoal have helped that warming.
>>
>> Wrong again
>>
>> Huh!
>>
>> - two things have contributed greatly to the the high
>> CO2 levels in the atmosphere and it is not so called fossil fuels. The
>> world wide destruction of the forests
>>
>> You're in such a hurry that you failed to read what I posted. Why did
>> man
>> burn forests? To produce charcoal .
>
> There have been little industrial use of charcoal since WW II except
> in the distillation of methyl hydrate and that is now obsolete
My word you're a bloody fool. Man turned those forests into charcoal when
iron began to be manufactured in bulk. When was that? Over a thousand
years ago. Man has altered the world considerably in the last 10,000 years
since he ceased to be a hunter gatherer. The 20th century merely
accelerated the harm he has caused to the world's environment.
>
>
> Where did I mention fossil fuels?
>
>> Nowhere!
>
> so what????
It was you who mentioned them in your post that I endeavoured to respond to.
>>
>> and the coverage of so much of the
>> soil with masonry, concrete and tar. Green plants take in CO2 and
>> emit
>> oxygen.
>>
>> - -
>> Befuddled Gore keeps blathering about
>> how the oceans are being heated by
>> global warming, instead of the warming
>> being created by the oceans, as the facts
>> clearly show.
>>
>> You haven't quoted any sources for these 'facts'. Please do so
>
> Two of us have posted that stuff a dozen times each. Since you did not
> read it now you can google for it
Obviously you are wary of letting me examine these sources.
news:[email protected] oups.com...
>>
>> I agree. Cooling always follows warming. I just don't think it's
>> happening now
>>
>> and, to put it at its
>>
>> > mildest, man's activities since he decided to turn the great forests of
>> > Europe into charcoal have helped that warming.
>>
>> Wrong again
>>
>> Huh!
>>
>> - two things have contributed greatly to the the high
>> CO2 levels in the atmosphere and it is not so called fossil fuels. The
>> world wide destruction of the forests
>>
>> You're in such a hurry that you failed to read what I posted. Why did
>> man
>> burn forests? To produce charcoal .
>
> There have been little industrial use of charcoal since WW II except
> in the distillation of methyl hydrate and that is now obsolete
My word you're a bloody fool. Man turned those forests into charcoal when
iron began to be manufactured in bulk. When was that? Over a thousand
years ago. Man has altered the world considerably in the last 10,000 years
since he ceased to be a hunter gatherer. The 20th century merely
accelerated the harm he has caused to the world's environment.
>
>
> Where did I mention fossil fuels?
>
>> Nowhere!
>
> so what????
It was you who mentioned them in your post that I endeavoured to respond to.
>>
>> and the coverage of so much of the
>> soil with masonry, concrete and tar. Green plants take in CO2 and
>> emit
>> oxygen.
>>
>> - -
>> Befuddled Gore keeps blathering about
>> how the oceans are being heated by
>> global warming, instead of the warming
>> being created by the oceans, as the facts
>> clearly show.
>>
>> You haven't quoted any sources for these 'facts'. Please do so
>
> Two of us have posted that stuff a dozen times each. Since you did not
> read it now you can google for it
Obviously you are wary of letting me examine these sources.
Mar 18th 2007, 11:13 am
#59
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Danish scientist: Global warming is a myth
On Mar 18, 4:25 pm, "John Rennie" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Obviously you are wary of letting me examine these sources.
It appears that you do not know how to google
That is a pity.
>
> Obviously you are wary of letting me examine these sources.
It appears that you do not know how to google
That is a pity.
Mar 18th 2007, 11:53 am
#60
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Danish scientist: Global warming is a myth -- The DANISH? They invented the sex c
The DANISH? They invented the sex change operation (google Christine
Jorgenson) and legalized kiddie porn. They even appointing that
fagmeister Bjorn Lomborg as a top government "scientist".
So what did the Queer Gay Faggy Bjorn Lomberg Homosexual Say This
Week...
...About Gay Marriage, that is, the ONLY subject he actually has any
qualifications on.
[email protected] wrote:
> Roger Coppock must have written this it's typically libellous
Every single word is copied verbatum from Google Search Results to
the
questions posed exactly as shown...
http://tinyurl.com/ymfaxx
Results 1 - 100 of about 36,800 for Bjorn Lomborg Homosexual |
Homosexuality.
See, there you have it: Bjorn Lomborg, another rightwinger with a cock
in his mouth and another one up his butt...
For example, he chose for his Book Club, The Skeptical
Environmentalist
by Bjorn Lomborg, who is an out homosexual. It's kind of a Gay
Rightwinger Mutual ...
http://www.isteve.com/Web%20Exclusiv...MarApr2002.htm
Bjorn Lomborg, a former Greenpeace activist and vegetarian homosexual,
is a man of the left. But he authored "The Skeptical
Environmentalist,"
which ...
http://www.aim.org/media_monitor_archive/A2004012/
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...11/ai_n8358914
Bjorn Lomborg is hardly a typical champion for any conservative cause.
The 37-year-old Danish professor is a former Greenpeace activist and
vegetarian homosexual.
Going back to the original charge in Johann's article on Bjorn
Lomborg,
... paedophilia,bestiality , the propagation of homosexuality,cross
dressing,the ...
http://dailyablution.blogs.com/the_d.../07/artnewsart....
Its founder, Bjorn Lomborg, was described by the Copenhagen Post as:
"a former member of Greenpeace, an avowed homosexual, a passionate
vegetarian, and, ...
http://www.businessandmedia.org/spec...balwarming_stu...
Retief Lies! Karl Rove's Bumboy wrote:
> Didn't I read that Bjorn Lomberg was arrested for pedophilia and
> distributing kiddie-porn?
Opps, my bad. Bjorn LombErg is off the hook, it was BJORN LOMBORG that
I read about...
http://tinyurl.com/ya8p6u
Google Results 1 - 2 of 2 for Bjorn Lomborg was arrested for
pedophilia
and distributing kiddie-porn.
http://www.crispian.demon.co.uk/index3b.htm
Chris Brand -- Psychologist
Your defence of the Danish anti-Green statistician, Bjorn Lomborg, ...
According to the Observer, it may be that Internet kiddieporn that
leads paedophiles ...
Mail 239 January 6 - 12, 2003
And ditto about the virtual kiddie porn. The point of such laws isn't
to prevent ... right wing and biased people leaping to the defense of
Bjorn Lomborg. ...
http://www.jerrypournelle.com/archiv...l/mail239.html
http://tinyurl.com/ym4rtt
Google Results 1 - 5 of 5 for Bjorn Lomborg arrested pedophilia |
distributing kiddie-porn.
http://tinyurl.com/y4q7cu
Results 1 - 100 of about 139 for Bjorn Lomborg arrested for pedophilia
Blue Crab Boulevard � Civilization
Bjorn Lomborg busted-and that is the only word for it-onto the
world scene in 2001 with ... "We want to make pedophilia the subject
of
discussion," he said, ...
http://bluecrabboulevard.com/categor...zation/page/2/
The Bible has masturbation scenes, rape, pedophilia and God's favorite
man ... The immortal Bjorn Lomborg takes on a new study claiming
global
warming will ...
http://www.reason.com/blog/archive/2006-10-29.html
Remember Bjorn Lomborg, famous proven scientific fraudster ? ... We
need to stop accepting pedophilia as part of our civilisation, it
isn't, ...
http://houseofdumb.blogspot.com/2003_12_01_archive.html
... The Skeptical Environmentalist by Bjorn Lomborg, who is an out
homosexual. ... Apparently, at least a few of the many Israelis
arrested after 9/11 were ...
http://www.isteve.com/Web%20Exclusiv...MarApr2002.htm
"I acted like a person completely out of control when I was arrested,"
he ... "Two years ago, a Danish environmentalist called Bjorn Lomborg
had an idea. ...
http://rightwingsparkle.blogspot.com...ngsparkle_arch...
[see Bjorn's site and that of the anti-Lomborg pie-thrower] ... Of the
pedophilia charge, Hooper said: "The prophet Muhammad didn't do
anything not in ...
http://gnxp.blogspot.com/2002_06_01_gnxp_archive.html
17 Feb , 2006, H2 -PV NOW, Google Results For : Bjorn Lomborg In
Brothel ... Http ://snipurl .com /mool Usenet Poster 'martin '
Arrested
For Pedophilia . ...
http://www.n-n-a.com/group.php?p4-25-2
Bjorn Lomborg is yet to even arrive in Australia, and already the
slamming ... A convicted killer and pedophile remains on the run after
slipping away from ...
http://timblair.spleenville.com/archives/2003_09.php
Bjorn Lomborg, a self-proclaimed environmentalist, assembled a panel
of
... was arrested last year under a provision of the state's criminal
code that makes ...
http://www.stonescryout.org/archives...ent/index.html
Bjorn Lomborg described how his serious book, "The Skeptical ... as
has
been shown in the Cambodian hamlet of Svay Pak, which specialized in
pedophilia. ...
http://listserv.shamash.org/cgi-bin/...op&T=0&O=D&Pb6
Check out the site of the renowned Danish environmentalist Bj�rn
Lomborg. ... photographs and videotapes revolve around prostitution,
rape and pedophilia. ...
http://chippla.blogspot.com/2004_11_01_archive.html
This isn't the first time he's been arrested for doing similar things.
... Others, such as the Danish economist Bjorn Lomborg, argue that,
although global ...
http://roguepundit.typepad.com/rogue...ent/index.html
Surely, we don't treat murder, pedophilia, and incest the same
way! ...
Bjorn Lomborg, author of "The Skeptical Environmentalist", was at the
receiving end ...
http://www.authorsden.com/adstorage/161/philosophy.doc
The impotent police, who would once have arrested people behaving in
like fashion, ... Which is exactly what the critics of Bjorn Lomborg,
the author of The ...
http://www.eddriscoll.com/2004_03_14...e_archive.html
So they can crow about how the conviced some pedophile. It's more
common than not that district attorneys go ... Certainly Bjorn Lomborg
acknowledges it. ...
http://hud.blogspot.com/2002_06_01_hud_archive.html
With the air of bemused politeness that has marked Lomborg's response
to his ... Of those cases, 387 involved child prostitution or child
pornography. ...
http://www.moonfarmer.org/archives/2002_03.php
A commentor asks what I think is wrong with Bjorn Lomborg. ... 660
images of adult pornography, 546 images of suspected dead Iraqi
detainees, ...
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2006/02/index.html
Jorgenson) and legalized kiddie porn. They even appointing that
fagmeister Bjorn Lomborg as a top government "scientist".
So what did the Queer Gay Faggy Bjorn Lomberg Homosexual Say This
Week...
...About Gay Marriage, that is, the ONLY subject he actually has any
qualifications on.
[email protected] wrote:
> Roger Coppock must have written this it's typically libellous
Every single word is copied verbatum from Google Search Results to
the
questions posed exactly as shown...
http://tinyurl.com/ymfaxx
Results 1 - 100 of about 36,800 for Bjorn Lomborg Homosexual |
Homosexuality.
See, there you have it: Bjorn Lomborg, another rightwinger with a cock
in his mouth and another one up his butt...
For example, he chose for his Book Club, The Skeptical
Environmentalist
by Bjorn Lomborg, who is an out homosexual. It's kind of a Gay
Rightwinger Mutual ...
http://www.isteve.com/Web%20Exclusiv...MarApr2002.htm
Bjorn Lomborg, a former Greenpeace activist and vegetarian homosexual,
is a man of the left. But he authored "The Skeptical
Environmentalist,"
which ...
http://www.aim.org/media_monitor_archive/A2004012/
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...11/ai_n8358914
Bjorn Lomborg is hardly a typical champion for any conservative cause.
The 37-year-old Danish professor is a former Greenpeace activist and
vegetarian homosexual.
Going back to the original charge in Johann's article on Bjorn
Lomborg,
... paedophilia,bestiality , the propagation of homosexuality,cross
dressing,the ...
http://dailyablution.blogs.com/the_d.../07/artnewsart....
Its founder, Bjorn Lomborg, was described by the Copenhagen Post as:
"a former member of Greenpeace, an avowed homosexual, a passionate
vegetarian, and, ...
http://www.businessandmedia.org/spec...balwarming_stu...
Retief Lies! Karl Rove's Bumboy wrote:
> Didn't I read that Bjorn Lomberg was arrested for pedophilia and
> distributing kiddie-porn?
Opps, my bad. Bjorn LombErg is off the hook, it was BJORN LOMBORG that
I read about...
http://tinyurl.com/ya8p6u
Google Results 1 - 2 of 2 for Bjorn Lomborg was arrested for
pedophilia
and distributing kiddie-porn.
http://www.crispian.demon.co.uk/index3b.htm
Chris Brand -- Psychologist
Your defence of the Danish anti-Green statistician, Bjorn Lomborg, ...
According to the Observer, it may be that Internet kiddieporn that
leads paedophiles ...
Mail 239 January 6 - 12, 2003
And ditto about the virtual kiddie porn. The point of such laws isn't
to prevent ... right wing and biased people leaping to the defense of
Bjorn Lomborg. ...
http://www.jerrypournelle.com/archiv...l/mail239.html
http://tinyurl.com/ym4rtt
Google Results 1 - 5 of 5 for Bjorn Lomborg arrested pedophilia |
distributing kiddie-porn.
http://tinyurl.com/y4q7cu
Results 1 - 100 of about 139 for Bjorn Lomborg arrested for pedophilia
Blue Crab Boulevard � Civilization
Bjorn Lomborg busted-and that is the only word for it-onto the
world scene in 2001 with ... "We want to make pedophilia the subject
of
discussion," he said, ...
http://bluecrabboulevard.com/categor...zation/page/2/
The Bible has masturbation scenes, rape, pedophilia and God's favorite
man ... The immortal Bjorn Lomborg takes on a new study claiming
global
warming will ...
http://www.reason.com/blog/archive/2006-10-29.html
Remember Bjorn Lomborg, famous proven scientific fraudster ? ... We
need to stop accepting pedophilia as part of our civilisation, it
isn't, ...
http://houseofdumb.blogspot.com/2003_12_01_archive.html
... The Skeptical Environmentalist by Bjorn Lomborg, who is an out
homosexual. ... Apparently, at least a few of the many Israelis
arrested after 9/11 were ...
http://www.isteve.com/Web%20Exclusiv...MarApr2002.htm
"I acted like a person completely out of control when I was arrested,"
he ... "Two years ago, a Danish environmentalist called Bjorn Lomborg
had an idea. ...
http://rightwingsparkle.blogspot.com...ngsparkle_arch...
[see Bjorn's site and that of the anti-Lomborg pie-thrower] ... Of the
pedophilia charge, Hooper said: "The prophet Muhammad didn't do
anything not in ...
http://gnxp.blogspot.com/2002_06_01_gnxp_archive.html
17 Feb , 2006, H2 -PV NOW, Google Results For : Bjorn Lomborg In
Brothel ... Http ://snipurl .com /mool Usenet Poster 'martin '
Arrested
For Pedophilia . ...
http://www.n-n-a.com/group.php?p4-25-2
Bjorn Lomborg is yet to even arrive in Australia, and already the
slamming ... A convicted killer and pedophile remains on the run after
slipping away from ...
http://timblair.spleenville.com/archives/2003_09.php
Bjorn Lomborg, a self-proclaimed environmentalist, assembled a panel
of
... was arrested last year under a provision of the state's criminal
code that makes ...
http://www.stonescryout.org/archives...ent/index.html
Bjorn Lomborg described how his serious book, "The Skeptical ... as
has
been shown in the Cambodian hamlet of Svay Pak, which specialized in
pedophilia. ...
http://listserv.shamash.org/cgi-bin/...op&T=0&O=D&Pb6
Check out the site of the renowned Danish environmentalist Bj�rn
Lomborg. ... photographs and videotapes revolve around prostitution,
rape and pedophilia. ...
http://chippla.blogspot.com/2004_11_01_archive.html
This isn't the first time he's been arrested for doing similar things.
... Others, such as the Danish economist Bjorn Lomborg, argue that,
although global ...
http://roguepundit.typepad.com/rogue...ent/index.html
Surely, we don't treat murder, pedophilia, and incest the same
way! ...
Bjorn Lomborg, author of "The Skeptical Environmentalist", was at the
receiving end ...
http://www.authorsden.com/adstorage/161/philosophy.doc
The impotent police, who would once have arrested people behaving in
like fashion, ... Which is exactly what the critics of Bjorn Lomborg,
the author of The ...
http://www.eddriscoll.com/2004_03_14...e_archive.html
So they can crow about how the conviced some pedophile. It's more
common than not that district attorneys go ... Certainly Bjorn Lomborg
acknowledges it. ...
http://hud.blogspot.com/2002_06_01_hud_archive.html
With the air of bemused politeness that has marked Lomborg's response
to his ... Of those cases, 387 involved child prostitution or child
pornography. ...
http://www.moonfarmer.org/archives/2002_03.php
A commentor asks what I think is wrong with Bjorn Lomborg. ... 660
images of adult pornography, 546 images of suspected dead Iraqi
detainees, ...
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2006/02/index.html
