BritishInOhio

Are you going to invite John Henry?!

trentonramsey

she cant invite John Henry, he is banned.

this group will not tolerate anyone who speaks the truth. He told her that her man was lying and they cant handle it

cutenurse300

Do you have any idea,it s realy cheap the way you talk..and you have no idea about our situation,so stop this crap...it s difficult enough and JUST HAVE RESPECT FOR PEOPLE!!!

SecretGarden

Just so everyone knows, trenton........and I do speak the truth.....
The link to the website that was constructed about my fiance and me was posted under your username. I'm urging everyone to ignore your nonsense and let you just go away quietly. I suspect you may be next on the banned list.

~SecretGarden
~and Mr. Pink (day 117, NSC)

BritishInOhio

I personally thought that was a bit harsh also, espeshily as someone had suggested that in an earlier post and had not been banned. John Henry certainly was an ass but I will remember his classic post about being ball deep before the tyres on the plane had cooled. That must be the most classic line ever posted on this forum.

katesuiter1

This group will not tolerate abuse of any kind, (which John Henry has been very guilty of.), and it will also not tolerate trolls who prey on vunerable people.
Kate.

trentonramsey

trentonramsey

just so everyone knows mr pink


the link was posted by secret carrots

cutenurse300

Thanks Katesuiter!We appreciate that

katesuiter1

Kate. xxxxx

Matthew Udall

The attorney may or may not be a member of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, but even if he or she is, what is it that you think AILA can or will do?

Attorney discipline is handled by the State Bar Associations.

Matthew Udall

Hi Dave,
I don’t know where cutenurse is located on the planet, but if its not Canada than the idea of her going to Canada, marrying and filing for a K-3 might not work out for her.

First, I’ve not been called upon to do a K-3 before, however I was contacted by someone a week or two ago about “possibly� representing a couple in a K-3 case. The international spouse lives in a country other than Canada. She and hubby married in Canada, and since the K-3 must be processed at a U.S. Consulate in the country where the marriage took place, that would mean Canada.

I contacted the U.S. Consulate in Vancouver to confirm whether or not the bride could process her K-3 at the post. Vancouver said that yes, they process K-3, “however� they will “not� mail their packets to a non-Canadian address. They actually had the nerve to say if she did not have a Canadian address, than she would have to simply wait out the I-130 in her home country. Needless to say, I think their policy in this regard stinks (Vancouver’s mail room policy thwarts the intent of Congress… the reason Congress brought about the K-3 in the first place).

This is a situation that I think should be changed, and is a cause worth fighting for while moving up the chain of command at the U.S. Consulate in Vancouver.

M.U.

FlightRisk

Was it a contested no-fault? Non contested is even longer than contested, 120 days. You should have been notified that this period must transpire after your court date. MA is pretty bad, lots of states don't have anything like that. Didn't you have to wait for your divorce decree? I wouldn't think a state would give you one of those until the perios was over. A local attorney should have caught that. sorry. Check out this ling

http://www.cyberstation.net/paralegal/mass.htm

-fr

tupperwareparty

dwaarf said it happened to him.. and he was able to get the k-1 back on track... so I would talk to him,,,'

Andrew Defaria

Leslie66 wrote:

    >> Obligatory witty line: The beatings will continue until morale improves.
    > Andrew,
    > Your witty lines slay me.

I have 344 of them! http://defaria.com/cgi-bin/funnyline.cgi?list=yes

===
Obligatory witty line: If ignorance is bliss, you must be orgasmic.