British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   The Maple Leaf (https://britishexpats.com/forum/maple-leaf-98/)
-   -   What a cop out... (https://britishexpats.com/forum/maple-leaf-98/what-cop-out-660804/)

Jingsamichty Mar 23rd 2010 6:13 am

What a cop out...
 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e...on/8582478.stm

How disappointing that the police officer accused of assaulting a G20 protestor (the incident infamously caught on TV cameras) has resorted to a pathetic excuse that he "thought a carton of orange juice in her hand was a weapon".

Have a look at the video again. Isn't that a rubbish defence?

Come on, Officer Smellie, just admit that you gave shrieking hippy exactly what she deserved.

Almost Canadian Mar 23rd 2010 6:18 am

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by Jingsamichty (Post 8442267)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e...on/8582478.stm

How disappointing that the police officer accused of assaulting a G20 protestor (the incident infamously caught on TV cameras) has resorted to a pathetic excuse that he "thought a carton of orange juice in her hand was a weapon".

Have a look at the video again. Isn't that a rubbish defence?

Come on, Officer Smellie, just admit that you gave shrieking hippy exactly what she deserved.

Surely, then, that will give all chavs an excuse for accosting people with a carton of orange juice in their hands?

Edit: I've just noticed that the verdict hasn't been given yet. Here's hoping he gets convicted.

dbd33 Mar 23rd 2010 6:20 am

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by Jingsamichty (Post 8442267)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e...on/8582478.stm

How disappointing that the police officer accused of assaulting a G20 protestor (the incident infamously caught on TV cameras) has resorted to a pathetic excuse that he "thought a carton of orange juice in her hand was a weapon".

Have a look at the video again. Isn't that a rubbish defence?

Come on, Officer Smellie, just admit that you gave shrieking hippy exactly what she deserved.


That does seem a rubbish defence, I don't suppose anyone involved believes it.

iaink Mar 23rd 2010 6:49 am

Re: What a cop out...
 
Wasnt there a python sketch where soldiers "armed" with fruit were shot by an overenthusiastic authority figure? Life imitating art perhaps?

For some reason the classic "Constable Savage" NTNoCN sketch comes to mind, although its entirely inappropriate to this thread!

Alan2005 Mar 23rd 2010 7:53 am

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by Almost Canadian (Post 8442280)
Surely, then, that will give all chavs an excuse for accosting people with a carton of orange juice in their hands?

Edit: I've just noticed that the verdict hasn't been given yet. Here's hoping he gets convicted.

I hope he's convicted too - beating a girl half his size with a stick; jeez some hardened copper that is. I guess we should be thankful they weren't armed with tazers on that occasion.

jimf Mar 23rd 2010 8:46 am

Re: What a cop out...
 
Was the orange juice organic/fairtrade?

The following quote conjures up a certain stereotype.....

The court head Ms Fisher, of Brighton, was depressed and "unwilling" to attend proceedings over fears the defence would focus on her lifestyle and background.

tim010 Mar 23rd 2010 11:18 am

Re: What a cop out...
 
It will be interesting to see if this goes anywhere due to the last few paragraphs stating the victim would not attend court. If it was any other case it would be thrown out straight away!

"The court head Ms Fisher, of Brighton, was depressed and "unwilling" to attend proceedings over fears the defence would focus on her lifestyle and background.

District Judge Daphne Wickham ruled her statement to independent investigators could not be admitted in evidence, but turned down an application by the defence to throw out the case."

Tim

Alan2005 Mar 23rd 2010 11:22 am

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by tim010 (Post 8443027)
It will be interesting to see if this goes anywhere due to the last few paragraphs stating the victim would not attend court. If it was any other case it would be thrown out straight away!

"The court head Ms Fisher, of Brighton, was depressed and "unwilling" to attend proceedings over fears the defence would focus on her lifestyle and background.

District Judge Daphne Wickham ruled her statement to independent investigators could not be admitted in evidence, but turned down an application by the defence to throw out the case."

Tim

Her concerns were valid. The prosecution doesn't need her evidence - he's bang to rights in the video.

Novocastrian Mar 23rd 2010 11:25 am

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by Alan2005 (Post 8443033)
Her concerns were valid. The prosecution doesn't need her evidence - he's bang to rights in the video.

Nonsense. The officer was just dong his duty to protect the elite against a carton of orange juice.

tim010 Mar 23rd 2010 11:26 am

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by Alan2005 (Post 8443033)
Her concerns were valid. The prosecution doesn't need her evidence - he's bang to rights in the video.

He may appear to be bang to rights in the video but the copper has been charged with common assault which means that the person he hit is the victim.

Normally at court when the victim fails to turn up for whatever reason the case is simply thrown out.

Tim

rae Mar 23rd 2010 11:29 am

Re: What a cop out...
 
there is another side to this. firstly the complainant/aggrieved party and witness is not willing to appear and the statement she submitted will not be presented in evidence. yet the trial goes ahead? i sincerely doubt this would be the case in any other arena apart from a very public trial of a police officer.
now thats not saying i don't believe the police should be held to higher account, because i do. however, you can't have one set of trial rules for the general population and another for the police.

on the orange juice thing, yes that does sound like bollox, however again, the court has ruled all his actions up until this point lawful, so it begs the point if he was acting lawfully up until this point are we are quibbling over a very very fine line in the heat of the moment. i'm not saying he should not be held accountable, but how would you feel if you were about to lose your job, pension, house, relationship all for what appears to be a minor error of judgement under extreme pressure. cops are human you know, sometimes we get it wrong, this is when i object to a public lynching. though i appreciate he appears not to be helping with this defence.

Novocastrian Mar 23rd 2010 11:42 am

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by rae (Post 8443052)
there is another side to this. firstly the complainant/aggrieved party and witness is not willing to appear and the statement she submitted will not be presented in evidence. yet the trial goes ahead? i sincerely doubt this would be the case in any other arena apart from a very public trial of a police officer.

Err, I rather suspect it would be the case anyway if the assault was recorded live like this one. The flip side is if that hadn't been the case, the complainant could show up as often as she liked but a complaint against a policeman would never have a chance.

fledermaus Mar 23rd 2010 12:11 pm

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by jimf (Post 8442670)
Was the orange juice organic/fairtrade?

The following quote conjures up a certain stereotype.....

The court head Ms Fisher, of Brighton, was depressed and "unwilling" to attend proceedings over fears the defence would focus on her lifestyle and background.

One should try not to judge people by appearances.

Cape Blue Mar 23rd 2010 1:13 pm

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by Jingsamichty (Post 8442267)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e...on/8582478.stm

How disappointing that the police officer accused of assaulting a G20 protestor (the incident infamously caught on TV cameras) has resorted to a pathetic excuse that he "thought a carton of orange juice in her hand was a weapon".

Have a look at the video again. Isn't that a rubbish defence?

Come on, Officer Smellie, just admit that you gave shrieking hippy exactly what she deserved.

It was a container of acid.








ascorbic acid

Cape Blue Mar 23rd 2010 1:20 pm

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by iaink (Post 8442365)
Wasnt there a python sketch where soldiers "armed" with fruit were shot by an overenthusiastic authority figure? Life imitating art perhaps?

For some reason the classic "Constable Savage" NTNoCN sketch comes to mind, although its entirely inappropriate to this thread!

Was she in possesion of thick lips and wearing a loud shirt in a built-up area?

jimf Mar 23rd 2010 1:33 pm

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by fledermaus (Post 8443123)
One should try not to judge people by appearances.

It's her decision to not appear in court and the reasons given which appear to indicate she is aware of her own lack of credibility as a witness.

Obviously the policeman made a mistake.

No one comes out with a great deal of credit.

fledermaus Mar 23rd 2010 1:52 pm

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by jimf (Post 8443251)
It's her decision to not appear in court and the reasons given which appear to indicate she is aware of her own lack of credibility as a witness.

Obviously the policeman made a mistake.

No one comes out with a great deal of credit.

I don't think that indicates her lack of credibility at all. It indicates what she said - that in court the defence will try to discredit her to gain the upper hand and that any information released in court will become public knowledge. Would you want details of your life in the national newspapers?? You would want it even less if you were depressed.

Alan2005 Mar 23rd 2010 1:55 pm

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by fledermaus (Post 8443282)
I don't think that indicates her lack of credibility at all. It indicates what she said - that in court the defence will try to discredit her to gain the upper hand and that any information released in court will become public knowledge. Would you want details of your life in the national newspapers?? You would want it even less if you were depressed.

That's my reading of it too. I fully understand her reasons for not wanting to appear in court.

jimf Mar 23rd 2010 2:07 pm

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by fledermaus (Post 8443282)
I don't think that indicates her lack of credibility at all. It indicates what she said - that in court the defence will try to discredit her to gain the upper hand and that any information released in court will become public knowledge. Would you want details of your life in the national newspapers?? You would want it even less if you were depressed.

If she was a credible witness she would have no trouble at all in appearing in court. The defence would only be able to successfully discredit her if there was a basis upon which to discredit her.

She has the opportunity to appear in court to project herself as a reasonable person who was a victim of assault but has declined to do so.

fledermaus Mar 23rd 2010 2:10 pm

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by jimf (Post 8443304)
If she was a credible witness she would have no trouble at all in appearing in court. The defence would only be able to successfully discredit her if there was a basis upon which to discredit her.

She has the opportunity to appear in court to project herself as a reasonable person who was a victim of assault but has declined to do so.

you are saying then that only reasonable persons can be victims??

I have a few skeletons in my cupboard that I would not want publicised, plus an ex or two that I wouldn't want to know where I lived. I suppose in your view I would be an unreasonable person with no credibility as a witness.

Your prejudices are showing.

Auld Yin Mar 23rd 2010 2:40 pm

Re: What a cop out...
 
I always thought that the accused had the right to face his/her accuser, or is that just in the movies or on TV.

jimf Mar 23rd 2010 2:46 pm

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by fledermaus (Post 8443306)
you are saying then that only reasonable persons can be victims??

Of course not but a projection of unreasonable behaviour might help the policemans defence.

I have a few skeletons in my cupboard that I would not want publicised, plus an ex or two that I wouldn't want to know where I lived. I suppose in your view I would be an unreasonable person with no credibility as a witness.

I expect if there were a genuine threat to her health or security then the court would allow that information to be witheld but just to avoid fair questioning as part of the policemans entitlement to a fair defence - is the defence supposed to give her special treatment to allow her to appear as a witness without causing embarrassment to her?

Your prejudices are showing.

In what way?

.

Alan2005 Mar 23rd 2010 3:12 pm

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by jimf (Post 8443356)
.

I don't see what difference it makes either way. That copper is guilty of assault as can be seen from the video. Maybe the consequences don't merit the crime as rae suggests, but you can't say he didn't do it - cos he did. Dragging that young girl into court isn't going to change that.

Aviator Mar 23rd 2010 3:17 pm

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by Jingsamichty (Post 8442267)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e...on/8582478.stm

How disappointing that the police officer accused of assaulting a G20 protestor (the incident infamously caught on TV cameras) has resorted to a pathetic excuse that he "thought a carton of orange juice in her hand was a weapon".

Have a look at the video again. Isn't that a rubbish defence?

Come on, Officer Smellie, just admit that you gave shrieking hippy exactly what she deserved.

Surely he was just afraid of being squashed!

jimf Mar 23rd 2010 3:42 pm

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by Alan2005 (Post 8443395)
I don't see what difference it makes either way. That copper is guilty of assault as can be seen from the video. Maybe the consequences don't merit the crime as rae suggests, but you can't say he didn't do it - cos he did. Dragging that young girl into court isn't going to change that.

I wouldn't claim to be able to judge on that - I expect the judge (or jury?) will come to the correct decision.

Clearly he hit her but whether or not there are valid mitigating factors is for the judge to decide based on all the evidence not just the video.

She is over 18 isn't she?

dbd33 Mar 23rd 2010 11:45 pm

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by jimf (Post 8443441)
Clearly he hit her but whether or not there are valid mitigating factors is for the judge to decide based on all the evidence not just the video.


What evidence more can there be beyond than that shown? We see a shrill harridan baiting the cop to hit her. He does. The question is whether or not it was reasonable of him to do so, how much restraint can one expect from the police?

Introducing more considerations such as, for example, her drug taking and her sexual history, is just about muddying the waters. Either it's reasonable force or it isn't, it's not unreasonable force against a Conservative and reasonable force against an organic vegan.

airbornesapper Mar 24th 2010 12:05 am

Re: What a cop out...
 
I see two attempts by a good for nothing (self confessed leach on UK society) making two approaches at said cop who rightly brushed aside this weasel using only his highly trained peripheral vision in tune with his gloved hand and then his baton.

Still gobbing off she got whacked, sad story....

Its just a video, the cop was there for real having to watch a wide arc filled with other nutters.

Pity he was not carry a proper full length baseball bat type baton rather than his little albeit puny quick extender; then he could have stayed back a bit (also keeping the smell away) giving them a good prod to keep their distance...

My two cents...now off to refresh my aid to the civil power-baton wielding skills.

Life is good.

dbd33 Mar 24th 2010 12:33 am

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by airbornesapper (Post 8444215)
My two cents...now off to refresh my aid to the civil power-baton wielding skills.

Life is good.


A question, if I may. Would you say that your extremist authoritarian viewpoints derive from your lack of communication skills, or does holding such views adle one's brain?

The great difficulty the rest of have in discussions with those, such as yourself, who hold views on the extreme right is that such views are rarely advanced in a coherent fashion. I can understand this in the case of Americans, trailer trash from the States beyond the net of the education system, but you're from the UK, you must once have been able to form sentences.

Life Military Brain ****ing is it?

Jingsamichty Mar 24th 2010 12:58 am

Re: What a cop out...
 
If I get caught on camera speeding, that evidence in itself is enough to convict me. I don't need to appear in court, and no copper ever saw me do it.

The amount of CCTV cameras in the UK suggests that video evidence is considered to be pretty much incontrovertable, so I assume that this is why the judge is allowing the video evidence to stand on its own, without the presence of the undoubtedly whiny and highly annoying victim.

Jingsamichty Mar 24th 2010 12:59 am

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by rae (Post 8443052)
however, you can't have one set of trial rules for the general population and another for the police.


I would agree with that most strongly. Probably not in the way you meant it though. ;)

Almost Canadian Mar 24th 2010 1:39 am

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by jimf (Post 8443304)
If she was a credible witness she would have no trouble at all in appearing in court. The defence would only be able to successfully discredit her if there was a basis upon which to discredit her.

She has the opportunity to appear in court to project herself as a reasonable person who was a victim of assault but has declined to do so.

Have you ever given evidence in Court? I regularly rip people to bits in cross examination. I would be very unlikely to give evidence in any case, particularly one that I am unlikely to personally benefit from.

Almost Canadian Mar 24th 2010 1:40 am

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by Auld Yin (Post 8443346)
I always thought that the accused had the right to face his/her accuser, or is that just in the movies or on TV.

The accuser is the State, not the women he assaulted.

Alan2005 Mar 24th 2010 2:52 am

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by airbornesapper (Post 8444215)
I see two attempts by a good for nothing (self confessed leach on UK society) making two approaches at said cop who rightly brushed aside this weasel using only his highly trained peripheral vision in tune with his gloved hand and then his baton.

Still gobbing off she got whacked, sad story....

Its just a video, the cop was there for real having to watch a wide arc filled with other nutters.

Pity he was not carry a proper full length baseball bat type baton rather than his little albeit puny quick extender; then he could have stayed back a bit (also keeping the smell away) giving them a good prod to keep their distance...

My two cents...now off to refresh my aid to the civil power-baton wielding skills.

Life is good.

Given your wish to fellate anyone in authority coupled with your apparent unquestioning ignorance you might want to consider a career in the met.

tim010 Mar 24th 2010 2:57 am

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by Almost Canadian (Post 8444427)
The accuser is the State, not the women he assaulted.

Yes the accuser is the state but the aggrieved is the woman. If you are in the legal system we both know that jobs where the aggrieved doesn't turn up will routinely get binned.

Tim

Almost Canadian Mar 24th 2010 3:05 am

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by tim010 (Post 8444601)
Yes the accuser is the state but the aggrieved is the woman. If you are in the legal system we both know that jobs where the aggrieved doesn't turn up will routinely get binned.

Tim

I don't know about that, there are very few victims of murderers that attend to give evidence. If there is sufficient evidence, the trial goes ahead. The police are there to uphold the law, they are not judge, jury and executioner. Their "authority" emanates from the fact that they are model citizens. If the officer in question cannot deal with provocation, he needs to find another occupation.

tim010 Mar 24th 2010 3:07 am

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by Almost Canadian (Post 8444622)
I don't know about that, there are very few victims of murderers that attend to give evidence. If there is sufficient evidence, the trial goes ahead. The police are there to uphold the law, the are not judge, jury and executioner. Their "authority" emanates from the fact that they are model citizens. If the officer in question cannot deal with provocation, he needs to find another occupation.

I don't think you can compare a murder with what this copper is on trial for. There obviously can't be a victim for that!!!

I'm just saying that in normal court cases for common assault it would have been binned if the victim did not wish to turn up and give their evidence.

Tim

jimf Mar 24th 2010 3:14 am

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by Almost Canadian (Post 8444426)
Have you ever given evidence in Court?
No
I regularly rip people to bits in cross examination.
I would hope you do if its your job to represent your client as effectively as possible
I would be very unlikely to give evidence in any case, particularly one that I am unlikely to personally benefit from.
Neither would I. However, if I had genuinely been the victim of an assault I would most likely wish to give evidence.

What is the legal situation compelling people to appear as witnesses? The defendant is entitled not to appear - although that usually seems to be taken as practically an admission of guilt so then its a question of whether other evidence exists to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Has the judge in this case made a special allowance for the victim to not appear - on what grounds - would it have been the prosecution lawyer who made that application? Will that not give grounds for the policeman to appeal at a later stage if he is found guilty at this trial?

Alan2005 Mar 24th 2010 3:19 am

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by tim010 (Post 8444632)
I don't think you can compare a murder with what this copper is on trial for. There obviously can't be a victim for that!!!

I'm just saying that in normal court cases for common assault it would have been binned if the victim did not wish to turn up and give their evidence.

Tim

So you think he should get off on what is basically a technicality then?

tim010 Mar 24th 2010 3:25 am

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by Alan2005 (Post 8444666)
So you think he should get off on what is basically a technicality then?

I think he should be afforded the same rights and procedures as any other person. That is all. It will be interesting to see the result of the trial.

Tim

Alan2005 Mar 24th 2010 3:34 am

Re: What a cop out...
 

Originally Posted by tim010 (Post 8444673)
I think he should be afforded the same rights and procedures as any other person. That is all. It will be interesting to see the result of the trial.

Tim

Sure, but what you are suggesting implies that I could beat the crap out of some-one, upload a video of it to you-tube and providing I intimidate the person into not appearing in court I would get off.


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 6:51 am.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.