![]() |
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 8448581)
Unfortunately, that is what the police are paid to do, if they can't do it, they should not wear the uniform.
I have just watched the clip, I thought the initial slap to the face was suspect. |
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8448623)
Maybe he shouldn't but that doesn't mean it was assault. It may warrant a warning, training etc but that doesn't mean it was assault.
|
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 8448591)
Why do you think that I will be saying that next? :blink:
That woman was a protestor, an agitator who was deliberately and repeatedly antagonising a policeman at a protest. Live by the sword, die by the sword. The leap to suggest that I agree with shooting innocent bystanders 7 times in the head is beneath you. I have faced riots in Northern Ireland as part of HM Forces. Never did I feel the need to aimlessly hit people. The actions of the officer appear to come from frustration as opposed to genuine fear, something he is expected to be able to control. |
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8448623)
Maybe he shouldn't but that doesn't mean it was assault. It may warrant a warning, training etc but that doesn't mean it was assault.
A threat of unlawful violence is an assault. If I say to you, "I am going to punch you in the face" that is an assault. |
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by rae
(Post 8448599)
but as you yourself put witnesses are ripped apart on cross examination for a reason, to discredit them and their evidence. the defence team of this officer will not have that possibility as she will not be there, therefore any possible bearing her past may have on the trial will never come to light.
|
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8448623)
Maybe he shouldn't but that doesn't mean it was assault. It may warrant a warning, training etc but that doesn't mean it was assault.
|
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 8448540)
I think that's probably correct. Do you think, based on what we see in video, that the policeman was using reasonable force?
|
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8448651)
I think he was in a difficult situation faced with a persistantly aggressive individual with lots of noise and pushing and shoving going on around him and took steps to neutralise that threat. Given the situation he was in I don't think the action he took was completely unreasonable. Viewed now from computer/officeland it might well be considered unreasonable by some I agree.
I do find it sad that a woman who is basically a professional protestor - she is described in court as an animal rights activist - can't take the odd whack from a copper as an occupational hazard. And it's sadder still that a 47-year-old Police Sergeant is basically perjuring himself rather than tell the truth. |
Re: What a cop out...
Out of interest what happened after she was hit? Did she get arrested?
|
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8448572)
It's easy for the likes of us to decide whats reasonable from the comfort of our computers. Less so for the policeman in the chaos taking place on that day.
No other officers there saw fit to assault anyone armed with a noisy gob (and a dangerous carton of juice) did they? Yes, you are right, it IS easy to judge. He was frustrated and overreacted. Should it end his career? no probably not. Should we turn a blind eye? Certainly not. |
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8448651)
I don't think the action he took was completely unreasonable.
Obviously I don't think men should beat women with sticks except in the most extreme circumstances and that neither being verbal irksome nor being oppressively close physically constitutes an extreme circumstance. I think the orange juice defence might work against him; I find it difficult to think of a manner in which someone could be genuinely threatening while consuming a soft drink. I think he might have arrested her without delivering the beating though I concede that it's hard to tell since we can't see the mob, if any, behind her. |
Re: What a cop out...
A copper hitting a shrieking hippy....
As Oscar Wilde might have said, "the unspeakable chasing the inedible." |
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8448674)
Erm, they do get training dont they?
No doubt now there is a field exercise where vocal annoying protestors charge up to individual officers slightly separated from the phalanx and they do the "correct" thing to defuse the situation - whatever that is as long as it doesn't involve reaching for the batton. No other officers there saw fit to assault anyone armed with a noisy gob and (a carton of juice) did they? Well - no one got caught on video anyway Yes, you are right, it IS easy to judge. He was frustrated and overreacted. Should it end his career? no probably not. Should we turn a blind eye? Certainly not. I certainly don't think we should turn a blind eye. I don't think the police should have freedom to whack anyone they feel like but at the same time i think reasonable allowance needs to be made for the situations they have to deal with. |
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8448720)
I certainly don't think we should turn a blind eye. I don't think the police should have freedom to whack anyone they feel like but at the same time i think reasonable allowance needs to be made for the situations they have to deal with.
He was an officer on duty at a rowdy protest, some shouting and confrontation is surely to be expected, and its certainly not illegal. Even as a five year old I was familiar with "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me", and it seems this guy is too, hence the rather improbable "orange juice" threat defence I guess. I still completely fail to see how that was regarded as sufficent danger to warrant his action, but I guess time will tell. The UK courts never fail to surprise me in the application of justice. |
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 8448685)
Not a million miles from jingsamichty's "could be considered not unreasonable". In short, no one seems to be prepared to say that this is a proper way for a policeman to behave. Some will make concessions because of his job, effectively holding him to a lower standard of behaviour than applies to the public at large.
I think the behaviour is undesirable certainly and not best practice no doubt but that in itself doesn't make it assault does it? Obviously I don't think men should beat women with sticks except in the most extreme circumstances and that neither being verbal irksome nor being oppressively close physically constitutes an extreme circumstance. I think the orange juice defence might work against him; I find it difficult to think of a manner in which someone could be genuinely threatening while consuming a soft drink. I think he might have arrested her without delivering the beating though I concede that it's hard to tell since we can't see the mob, if any, behind her. Yes the video doesn't necessarily show the whole picture. |
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 8448663)
I do find it sad that a woman who is basically a professional protestor - she is described in court as an animal rights activist - can't take the odd whack from a copper as an occupational hazard.
|
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8448754)
I think the behaviour is undesirable certainly and not best practice no doubt but that in itself doesn't make it assault does it
The defenders on this board will probably say coppers should be held to a higher standard than the general public because of the power they have (in fact I think rae even said this). They then go on to describe how they should actually be held to a lower standard (as dbd said) because their job is difficult and frustrating - well get another job then as beating young girls half your size with a truncheon is not the behaviour of hard case no-nonsense coppers. |
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8448754)
.
How do you define an assault? Do you agree that police officers driving cars at high speeds should not be held to account if they run someone over, after all, aren't they just doing their jobs in that instance as well? Should I be allowed to hit a police officer with a stick that if I feel threatened by him? |
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 8448771)
Where is is stated that she complained?
|
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 8448785)
Look at the video - after the cop had cuffed her, she ran back remonstrating and pointing out that he'd just hit a woman, the fascist pig-dog.
|
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 8448785)
Look at the video - after the cop had cuffed her, she ran back remonstrating and pointing out that he'd just hit a woman, the fascist pig-dog.
You obviously think it is OK for men to hit women, I don't. |
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 8448796)
OK. I meant in the prosecution sense.
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 8448796)
You obviously think it is OK for men to hit women, I don't.
|
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 8448780)
Should I be allowed to hit a police officer with a stick that if I feel threatened by him?
|
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 8448813)
As a lawyer, I'm sure you know that it's not what you meant that matters, it's what you said.
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 8448813)
You like leaping to conclusions, don't you? First, I was be "saying it's OK to shoot Brazilians on the Tube", and now "I obviously think it's OK for men to hit women."
Your reference to live by the sword, die by the sword, led me to this conclusion. So tell me then, did he do wrong by hitting her? |
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 8448774)
Yes, it does. If I did that to somebody then I would get done for assault.
The defenders on this board will probably say coppers should be held to a higher standard than the general public because of the power they have (in fact I think rae even said this). They then go on to describe how they should actually be held to a lower standard (as dbd said) because their job is difficult and frustrating - well get another job then as beating young girls half your size with a truncheon is not the behaviour of hard case no-nonsense coppers. What has gender got to do with it? Size inequality doesn't mean that the larger person can't perceive a threat from a smaller person |
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8448831)
She is an adult isn't she?
What has gender got to do with it? Size inequality doesn't mean that the larger person can't perceive a threat from a smaller person |
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8448831)
She is an adult isn't she?
What has gender got to do with it? Size inequality doesn't mean that the larger person can't perceive a threat from a smaller person Gender, or more specifically size has everything to do with it. |
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 8448843)
Oh yeah I forgot about the deadly juice.
Gender, or more specifically size has everything to do with it. |
Re: What a cop out...
When is the verdict due?
|
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8448851)
So if it was a male bodybuilder instead it would be okay to wack him?
|
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8448851)
So if it was a male bodybuilder instead it would be okay to wack him?
We can speculate all day on the what ifs, but the fact is that she wasn't a huge male body builder, she was a girl half his size and as such I fail to see how baton wielding could be considered by any normal person as 'reasonable' in this situation. It's far enough over the line of reasonable to constitute assault I think - obviously the CPS thinks so too. |
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 8448828)
Use of excessive force by the police was the point I was trying to make. Once again, I apologise if you do believe it was wrong for a person with an authority and size advantage over a woman such that most people would assume the latter posed no real threat to the former to commit an assault. Your reference to live by the sword, die by the sword, led me to this conclusion. So tell me then, did he do wrong by hitting her? This woman chose to go to a protest. She chose to be vocal and antagonising. She made the mistake of viewing the copper as personification of what she was protesting about. She harangued him while he was trying to do his job and keep order. He warned her a few times, but oh no, Little Miss Lentils knew better, and whack! - she got brought back to earth. If you go looking for trouble, don't be surprised when you find it. I don't see what all the hand-wringing about size or gender has to do with it. |
Re: What a cop out...
Imagine having this conversation with your parents:
"Dad, I went on a protest today and hassled a policeman, and he whacked me." What would your Dad have said to that? |
Re: What a cop out...
Oh come on, he whacked her two backhanders then moved closer to some other police officers, took out a truncheon and aimed at her from arms length.
What part of that is reasonable?? |
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by fledermaus
(Post 8448906)
Oh come on, he whacked her two backhanders then moved closer to some other police officers, took out a truncheon and aimed at her from arms length.
What part of that is reasonable?? |
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 8448641)
How can you discredit her in relation to whether or not she was assaulted? That is the only issue here, not whether she has assaulted people in the past. The only issue is whether the officer used reasonable force.
|
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 8448886)
Did he do wrong? No, in the circumstances, I don't necessarily think he did. He could have handled it better, but that's not the same thing as saying he was wrong. Remember - he didn't just walk up and whack a totally innocent bystander.
This woman chose to go to a protest. She chose to be vocal and antagonising. She made the mistake of viewing the copper as personification of what she was protesting about. She harangued him while he was trying to do his job and keep order. He warned her a few times, but oh no, Little Miss Lentils knew better, and whack! - she got brought back to earth. If you go looking for trouble, don't be surprised when you find it. I don't see what all the hand-wringing about size or gender has to do with it. I think you are allowing your judgement of this girls political position to cloud your judgement. |
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 8448913)
How many times should he have let her run up to him in that manner? Once? Twice? Ten times? All day?
"Sticks and stones may break my bones But words will never hurt me" She was at a protest about the death of someone at a previous protest. Shouting and some anger to be expected I think:rolleyes: So yes, All day. |
Re: What a cop out...
Rae, you're a copper. What do you make of Smellie's defence? What would the station locker room banter be about that?
|
Re: What a cop out...
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8448924)
Repeat after me.
"Sticks and stones may break my bones But words will never hurt me"
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8448924)
She was at a protest about the death of someone at a previous protest. Shouting and soem anger to be expected I think:rolleyes:
So yes, All day. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 3:51 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.