![]() |
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 12742023)
Johnson isn't just about Brexit, of course, steering government funds to an ineligible American he was bonking is more likely to bring him down.
But the bar is so low these days it will probably take something more. Perhaps he'll criticise the queen mum or Vera Lynn. |
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 12742223)
They have a stronger voice than non-EU countries but, insofar as most regulations are concerned, they do not have a veto so regulations can be enacted that are adverse to their interests.
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 12742225)
Has anyone seriously suggested that citizens from the UK or the EU will require a visa for vacation travel between the two blocks?
|
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by Paul_Shepherd
(Post 12742257)
There is only one country that still wants to hold on to imperial measures....and it wont be the UK.
Originally Posted by Paul_Shepherd
(Post 12742257)
For example going back to the small manufacturing company I worked for as an example,.....if smaller companies are forced to adopt new European design regulations, they may not be able to afford the cost of doing so, before hand, they had a choice weather they wanted to build a pressure vessel to another design code. . I think some of the EU rules and regulations are not in interests of some EU countries, especially the smaller less wealthy countries, but are forced to adopt them anyway....it kind of goes back to my point about culture and economic differences between the EU counties, whats suits one country may not suit another.
|
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by Paul_Shepherd
(Post 12742257)
As for needing a visa to visit France....thats never going to happen...passport yes, visa no.
Visa, no. Pre-entry clearance (ETIAS), most definitely from 2021. And they won't be boarding the plane or ferry to France without one. |
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 12742261)
Surely UK companies are in conformance with EU standards now. You seem to be making an argument for not joining the EU rather than leaving it.
Changing UK standards post-Brexit would potentially be expensive for UK companies. But if those standards aren't likely to change, what was the reason for leaving? |
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by DaveLovesDee
(Post 12742267)
But if those standards aren't likely to change, what was the reason for leaving?
There was a referendum and people, normal people, voted to leave. It had nothing to do with manufacturing standards, visas, the pound etc but everything to do with whether they felt the EU and politics in general was doing anything to make their life better. Those in power, the establishment, the bankers in fact anyone doing well put the case that being in the EU was a good thing and ignored anyone who thought differently. Well, I've got news for them, people not only didn't believe them they knew that staying in wouldn't change anything and as usual they were being told what to do and reacted against it. Any student of human nature would have understood this, but politicians etc were so absorbed with themselves that they simply couldn't conceive of the unimaginable. In the years that have passed without any action whatsoever, feelings will have hardened and anyone promising to leave will do well. This is the real reason an election is being delayed. Johnson might be an idiot, but I strongly suspect he understands this basic truth. |
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by dave_j
(Post 12742297)
I keep hammering the same nail into the EU coffin, but many posters still don't get it.
There was a referendum and people, normal people, voted to leave. It had nothing to do with manufacturing standards, visas, the pound etc but everything to do with whether they felt the EU and politics in general was doing anything to make their life better. Those in power, the establishment, the bankers in fact anyone doing well put the case that being in the EU was a good thing and ignored anyone who thought differently. Well, I've got news for them, people not only didn't believe them they knew that staying in wouldn't change anything and as usual they were being told what to do and reacted against it. Any student of human nature would have understood this, but politicians etc were so absorbed with themselves that they simply couldn't conceive of the unimaginable. In the years that have passed without any action whatsoever, feelings will have hardened and anyone promising to leave will do well. This is the real reason an election is being delayed. Johnson might be an idiot, but I strongly suspect he understands this basic truth. |
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 12742298)
So, in short, the case for leaving is that, although everything will be worse, it'll feel better. That truly is more stupid than electing Trump.
|
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by DaveLovesDee
(Post 12742263)
Passport, yes.
Visa, no. Pre-entry clearance (ETIAS), most definitely from 2021. And they won't be boarding the plane or ferry to France without one. |
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 12742261)
What if the UK wants closer trade ties with the US?
Surely UK companies are in conformance with EU standards now. You seem to be making an argument for not joining the EU rather than leaving it. To your first point,l as Canada is a metric country, its would be mo different than a Canadian manufacturing company exporting to the US... machines we built had to be in imperial....whereas other machines were metric, we had to work in both metric and imperial, its something i have done ever since working in Canada. |
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12742237)
Just putting on my AC hat for a moment, what do you think about the idea of US states and Canadian provinces restricting residency rights. Is there any reason that just because goods flow around the country people need to too?
|
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 12742256)
I've seen it suggested, how seriously I don't know, I would believe pretty much anything of the Brexiteers, including a return to LSD and/or wide lapels.
I do understand that free movement of goods and of people are not tied to each other but they do relate; if, for example, you manufacture a product in the UK and want to sell it in the EU, there might be a need to provide supporting expertise, long or short term, for that product. That's much easier if there are no constraints on the movement of workers. Perhaps if one did not have ideal trading conditions today one might not introduce them. That's quite different from having such good conditions and choosing to give them up. |
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 12742298)
So, in short, the case for leaving is that, although everything will be worse, it'll feel better. That truly is more stupid than electing Trump.
Blue passports, Up Yours Delors! |
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 12742298)
So, in short, the case for leaving is that, although everything will be worse, it'll feel better. That truly is more stupid than electing Trump.
Making logical arguments for staying, eg things will get worse, will make little impact and whether you like it or not the next election will be all about brexit and political parties who ignore this don't deserve to do well. For example if Labour think that party will trump leave then they're in for a shock. You might argue that voting leave was stupid and you imply that those who voted leave are stupid. It's attitudes like this, expressed by politicians and pundits in general, that'll ensure the leave vote will harden. |
Re: PM Boris
Originally Posted by dave_j
(Post 12742364)
I agree that many reasons for the leave vote were more emotional than otherwise, but burying your head in the sand won't change the fact that it happened, ask yourself why rather than simply arguing that it was wrong or dismissing possible explanations as waffle.
Making logical arguments for staying, eg things will get worse, will make little impact and whether you like it or not the next election will be all about brexit and political parties who ignore this don't deserve to do well. For example if Labour think that party will trump leave then they're in for a shock. You might argue that voting leave was stupid and you imply that those who voted leave are stupid. It's attitudes like this, expressed by politicians and pundits in general, that'll ensure the leave vote will harden. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 8:48 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.