Which is more 'newsworthy'?
#16
Part Time Poster









Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,219
From: Worcestershire











and hark about pot.. kettle.. black.. complaining about the forum degenerating
I had you and a few others on ignore for a while just so some topics would at least be readable and free from inane mindless chatter!
#17
Thread Starter
Banned










Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 15,706
From: In Limbo











You don't think starting a sarcastic thread belitting other peoples threads is 'having a go'? Or posting and saying their threads are pointless?
Simple answer is just ignore the threads if you're not interested.
And Louise didn't make a personal attack, she made a sarcastic comment which nobody has reported. So no need for any action.
Simple answer is just ignore the threads if you're not interested.And Louise didn't make a personal attack, she made a sarcastic comment which nobody has reported. So no need for any action.
)I feel it was a personal attack (however unlike some I fail to see the point in reporting/removing/editing or otherwise sanctioning everything I disagree with)
#18
Thread Starter
Banned










Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 15,706
From: In Limbo











Do me a favour then pal, put me back on ignore cos I couldnt give a rat ass what you think.
#19
The (inevitable) deaths of a (has been) actor and a (alcoholic) 'celebrity' chef or
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8256589.stm.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8256589.stm.
#22










Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 15,883

Maybe we need a new sub forum call it In Memoriam so some can post about all the celebrities that have passed away.
#24
#25










Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 15,883

There's one just like it in the Lounge. http://britishexpats.com/forum/showt...581322&page=64

#27
What's this then, if not a sarcastic thread belitting those that others have chosen to post? http://britishexpats.com/forum/showthread.php?t=630904 Hardly a subtle dig, was it?And sorry you feel it was a personal attack, I don't see it as anything other than a sarcastic comment in response to you implying that her thread tedious.
Again Butch, just ignore it if you don't agree with it! No need to always stir things up.
#28










Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 15,883

What's this then, if not a sarcastic thread belitting those that others have chosen to post? http://britishexpats.com/forum/showthread.php?t=630904 Hardly a subtle dig, was it?And sorry you feel it was a personal attack, I don't see it as anything other than a sarcastic comment in response to you implying that her thread tedious.
Again Butch, just ignore it if you don't agree with it! No need to always stir things up.
...and you should know better than to insert yourself into the middle of it and continually stir the damned pot.
As a moderator you should know when bite your tongue and to stay out of things.
You're all acting like bloody two years olds, for goodness sake grow up.
#29
I haven't closed any threads, or deleted Butch's sarcastic one either. I've only responded to those that have replied directly to me, in a polite manner. Hardly 'stirring the pot'.
Last edited by christmasoompa; Sep 15th 2009 at 8:17 am.
#30










Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 15,883

I'm simply trying to point out to Butch why the threads he posted are belittling to others and can be taken the wrong way as he clearly doesn't see it. And to respond to his complaint about a comment another member made towards him.
I haven't closed any threads, or deleted his sarcastic one either. I've only responded to those that have replied directly to me, in a polite manner. Hardly 'stirring the pot'.
I haven't closed any threads, or deleted his sarcastic one either. I've only responded to those that have replied directly to me, in a polite manner. Hardly 'stirring the pot'.

It's got nothing to do with closing or deleting threads.
If you want to get in a fight with someone and bring threads to their attention the do it via PM not the way you currently operate.
Your modus operandi is completely at odds with the way a moderator should function.





