London Riots
#167
#168










Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 14,227











You have two companies producing widgets:
Company A in Canada produces them for cost $100
Company B in the US produces them for $90, because it pays it's staff less or has a more efficient process.
Fair enough. Company B sells more widgets and/or makes more profit.
But if you have:
Company A in Canada produces them for cost $100
Company B in the US produces them for $110, but receives a subsidy from the government at $20/widget to bring the net cost to $90
Unfair. Company B is more profitable because it's being propped up by US taxpayers. Company B's widgets that are imported into Canada should be taxed at least $20 per widget.
#169
BE Forum Addict









Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,423
From: 9 years in the canadian trucking industry... Niverville MB











No it isn't. It's exactly the stance somebody who complains about BC liquor laws would adopt.
You have two companies producing widgets:
Company A in Canada produces them for cost $100
Company B in the US produces them for $90, because it pays it's staff less or has a more efficient process.
Fair enough. Company B sells more widgets and/or makes more profit.
But if you have:
Company A in Canada produces them for cost $100
Company B in the US produces them for $110, but receives a subsidy from the government at $20/widget to bring the net cost to $90
Unfair. Company B is more profitable because it's being propped up by US taxpayers. Company B's widgets that are imported into Canada should be taxed at least $20 per widget.
You have two companies producing widgets:
Company A in Canada produces them for cost $100
Company B in the US produces them for $90, because it pays it's staff less or has a more efficient process.
Fair enough. Company B sells more widgets and/or makes more profit.
But if you have:
Company A in Canada produces them for cost $100
Company B in the US produces them for $110, but receives a subsidy from the government at $20/widget to bring the net cost to $90
Unfair. Company B is more profitable because it's being propped up by US taxpayers. Company B's widgets that are imported into Canada should be taxed at least $20 per widget.

#170
No it isn't. It's exactly the stance somebody who complains about BC liquor laws would adopt.
You have two companies producing widgets:
Company A in Canada produces them for cost $100
Company B in the US produces them for $90, because it pays it's staff less or has a more efficient process.
Fair enough. Company B sells more widgets and/or makes more profit.
But if you have:
Company A in Canada produces them for cost $100
Company B in the US produces them for $110, but receives a subsidy from the government at $20/widget to bring the net cost to $90
Unfair. Company B is more profitable because it's being propped up by US taxpayers. Company B's widgets that are imported into Canada should be taxed at least $20 per widget.
You have two companies producing widgets:
Company A in Canada produces them for cost $100
Company B in the US produces them for $90, because it pays it's staff less or has a more efficient process.
Fair enough. Company B sells more widgets and/or makes more profit.
But if you have:
Company A in Canada produces them for cost $100
Company B in the US produces them for $110, but receives a subsidy from the government at $20/widget to bring the net cost to $90
Unfair. Company B is more profitable because it's being propped up by US taxpayers. Company B's widgets that are imported into Canada should be taxed at least $20 per widget.
I defer to your greater expertise
#173






Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,986











Finally the Thatcher legacy comes home to roost. Everyone who ever voted Tory is paying the price.
London's burning with boredom now.
Poverty and disparity is a dangerous thing. Just a matter of time til it comes to Canada, especially under people like Harper, Hudak and Ford.
London's burning with boredom now.
Poverty and disparity is a dangerous thing. Just a matter of time til it comes to Canada, especially under people like Harper, Hudak and Ford.
#174
Finally the Thatcher legacy comes home to roost. Everyone who ever voted Tory is paying the price.
London's burning with boredom now.
Poverty and disparity is a dangerous thing. Just a matter of time til it comes to Canada, especially under people like Harper, Hudak and Ford.
London's burning with boredom now.
Poverty and disparity is a dangerous thing. Just a matter of time til it comes to Canada, especially under people like Harper, Hudak and Ford.
Even my Canadian girlfriend noticed that the politicians, police administrators and reporters don't look or sound like the protesters.
#175






Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,986











Oh, Boris too and the rest of the Bullingdon Club...
Last edited by lmartin999; Aug 9th 2011 at 10:09 am.
#176
Finally the Thatcher legacy comes home to roost. Everyone who ever voted Tory is paying the price.
London's burning with boredom now.
Poverty and disparity is a dangerous thing. Just a matter of time til it comes to Canada, especially under people like Harper, Hudak and Ford.
London's burning with boredom now.
Poverty and disparity is a dangerous thing. Just a matter of time til it comes to Canada, especially under people like Harper, Hudak and Ford.
#177






Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,986











I trust you are more objective in your academic life than you are on this board. I thought that there were 13 or so years of Labour between the personalities you mention. What about those years or do you simply ignore facts that don't support your theories? University of East Anglia and all that

I don't understand the notion of objectivity. my research is unapolegtically subjective.
#178
I trust you are more objective in your academic life than you are on this board. I thought that there were 13 or so years of Labour between the personalities you mention. What about those years or do you simply ignore facts that don't support your theories? University of East Anglia and all that

#179
How does the blame lie with the conservatives? Every time they have been in power they (eventually) reduce unemployment. When Major left office the country's economy was in the best shape it had been in for decades, a fact which Brown tried to claim credit for. Then Labour came in, sold off the gold reserves for nothing, spent and spent without restraint, pouring huge amounts of this money into welfare, breaking the economy in the process and created a disgustingly unambitious benefit scrounging generation that since the beginning has created nothing but misery for respectable citizens who are trying to make a living. These riots are just that corrosive culture taken to a new height, the occasional band of chavs you saw on the street are now one giant angry gang with nothing better to do then smash shops and steal plasma TVs.




