![]() |
Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
If you believe in nonsense that's your issue just don't annoy me with your nonsense and also keep away from children.
|
Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 8781412)
No Iain.
Someone who believes that other people will go to Hell or suffer eternal damnation, or that their God is better than another person's God - they have a seriously screwed up view, caused by their religion. None of the church goers I know believe anything like that. What you are talking about is a very extremist view, and we all know extremists of all sorts, religous, political, or whatever, are nutters. Having faith in something larger than you doenst in itself make you a nutter, any more than believing in life elsewhere in the Universe, UFOs or that Spurs will one day win the premiership. Its also rather blind to the potential positive aspects of faith. Now, before you get all holier than thou, Im not a religous person, although I guess I share some common values. Im not a church goer, but I know many, and resent this ignorant view of them that gets spouted out here (and elsewhere) by people whose own views dont happen to coincide with theirs. I see a lot of comfort, stability and good that comes from their faith. |
Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8781425)
Exactly, you have a screwed up view of religion.
None of the church goers I know believe anything like that. What you are talking about is a very extremist view, and we all know extremists of all sorts, religous, political, or whatever, are nutters. Having faith in something larger than you doenst in itself make you a nutter, and more than believing in life elsewhere in the Universe, UFOs or that Spurs will one day win the premiership. Its also rather blind to the potential positive aspects of faith. Now, before you get all holier than thou, Im not a religous person, although I guess I share some common values. Im not a church goer, but I know many, and resent this ignorant view of them that gets spouted out here (and elsewhere) by people whose own views dont happen to coincide with theirs. I see a lot of comfort, stability and good that comes from their faith. Hypocrites, the lot of them. |
Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 8781444)
So why are so many of these supposedly decent Christians upset because somebody wants to build a mosque in NYC?
Hypocrites, the lot of them. Thats the conundrum of US politics, the "Christian Right" is at times anything but Christian. They should stop and ask themselves that tired old cliche "What would Jesus do" more often, only they wouldnt like the answer! |
Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 8781444)
So why are so many of these supposedly decent Christians upset because somebody wants to build a mosque in NYC?
Hypocrites, the lot of them. |
Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
Saudi Arabia is about as intolerant of other religions as one can get although there are others. Try spending time in such a country, particularly Saudi Arabia, for those that are not convinced with respect to how repressive such places are for non muslims.
That being said, Qatar has allowed a Christian (RC) church to be built, a significant though perhaps token event but in Saudi Arabia...not in a million years. I hope those opposing construction uncover the source of the mosque funding; it will be interesting to see how things unfold when they do. I think it is all about provocation....Nuff said. |
Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
The Saudi argument cuts both ways though. How are we supposed to convince the Saudis to be more open and receptive by making our society more oppressive and closed?
Personally I think the right wing have blown this out of proportion, two blocks is quite a ways from ground zero, and I find this idea that all muslims are associated with terrorists totally offensive. On the other hand if it is being funded and built for political rather that faith based reasons then there are a while lot of other considerations to take on board. |
Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8781485)
The Saudi argument cuts both ways though. How are we supposed to convince the Saudis to be more open and receptive by making our society more oppressive and closed?
Personally I think the right wing have blown this out of proportion, two blocks is quite a ways from ground zero, and I find this idea that all muslims are associated with terrorists totally offensive. On the other hand if it is being funded and built for political rather that faith based reasons then there are a while lot of other considerations to take on board. |
Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8781485)
The Saudi argument cuts both ways though. How are we supposed to convince the Saudis to be more open and receptive by making our society more oppressive and closed?
Perhaps if the likes of the UK and the US kept their noses out of other countries business then there would not be the mess that we have now. There seems to be lots of preaching about freedom of expression and tolerance, which I find hypocritical to say the least. |
Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
Originally Posted by CaptainHook
(Post 8781494)
As with most things in life, we're only likely to hear half-truth's form both sides of the issue, from politicians, the media and anyone else with an agenda. The truth lays somewhere in the middle.
|
Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
Originally Posted by ireland2canada
(Post 8781514)
Right, this is what I have trouble accepting. Who are we to tell the Saudis, or anyone else for that matter, how they should be? Surely it is none of our business. Why is there this urge to push Western "values" onto other cultures?
Perhaps if the likes of the UK and the US kept their noses out of other countries business then there would not be the mess that we have now. There seems to be lots of preaching about freedom of expression and tolerance, which I find hypocritical to say the least. |
Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
Originally Posted by CaptainHook
(Post 8781398)
People told Christopher Columbus he was crazy to think the world is round.
The simplest course of action would be to build a Christian Church, a Synagogue, a Hindu Temple, a Buddhist Temple, a Humanist centre.. etc etc.. At least this way, by the time all of the religions were recognised, each building would be so small there wouldn't be any room to worship inside & the congregations would all have to mingle in the middle during the relevant meetings & prayers.. |
Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
Originally Posted by airbornesapper
(Post 8781476)
Saudi Arabia is about as intolerant of other religions as one can get although there are others. Try spending time in such a country, particularly Saudi Arabia, for those that are not convinced with respect to how repressive such places are for non muslims.
That being said, Qatar has allowed a Christian (RC) church to be built, a significant though perhaps token event but in Saudi Arabia...not in a million years. I hope those opposing construction uncover the source of the mosque funding; it will be interesting to see how things unfold when they do. I think it is all about provocation....Nuff said. |
Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 8781534)
Ive no desire to convert Saudi Arabia to a western culture. But some basic human rights there wouldn't go amiss. Likewise for Israel. And a long list of other countries too.
The definition of human rights in places like the UK and Canada differs wildly from that in places such as Saudi or Isreal. This is why it bugs me to see people, most recently Mr Obama, bleating on about religious freedom of expression and tolerance. It seems that this tolerance is only extended to those who you agree with, those who have similar values. |
Re: "Ground Zero" Mosque. Should they or shouldn't they?
Originally Posted by ireland2canada
(Post 8781571)
I completely agree. However, often, the way in which the population treats each other is a reflection of their culture. The fact that I think that people are treated crappily in Saudi is really of no relevance. Who am I to tell other people what is or is not acceptable? I think that the way women are treated is beyond appalling, repellant.
The definition of human rights in places like the UK and Canada differs wildly from that in places such as Saudi or Isreal. This is why it bugs me to see people, most recently Mr Obama, bleating on about religious freedom of expression and tolerance. It seems that this tolerance is only extended to those who you agree with, those who have similar values. As the west is finding out again in Afghanistan, you cant quickly change hundreds of years of cultural baggage. But just because Saudi Arabia has a long history of (what to me appears to be) appalling behaviour to women (and other non male /heterosexual/ arab groups), doesnt mean we shouldnt endeavour to try and change things, directly or indirectly for the better. But thats really material for politics and diplomacy, rather than the fox news call in. Ultimately people believe in "stuff". If enough of them believe in the same stuff then the temptation is there to try and encourage other people to believe in it too. Sometimes the stuff in question is Christian faith, sometimes its Islam, sometimes its non secular beliefs like womens rights or freedom of religion for all. If you believe in it, then you have to keep trying I guess, win, loose or draw. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 3:09 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.