![]() |
Re: EU Referendum
Originally Posted by BritInParis
(Post 12001054)
There's equally as much evidence on the other side of the equation that many of the dire warnings given by the Remainers haven't come to pass either.
And when it does "come to pass", then we can evaluate the "dire warnings". Until then, at least there's a government now. |
Re: EU Referendum
Although the people have spoken, has the PM done her move placing MP's in strategic jobs (to her advantage) so as its likely Parliament may end up with a 'stay in the EU' outcome?
Its a question - does anyone know if Parliament has to debate the Brexit, then its passed onto the house of Lords before or if Article 50 is triggered? What could be the possible out, is that the UK could end up staying in the EU? |
Re: EU Referendum
Originally Posted by not2old
(Post 12002437)
Although the people have spoken, has the PM done her move placing MP's in strategic jobs (to her advantage) so as its likely Parliament may end up with a 'stay in the EU' outcome?
Its a question - does anyone know if Parliament has to debate the Brexit, then its passed onto the house of Lords before or if Article 50 is triggered? What could be the possible out, is that the UK could end up staying in the EU? But whether it does or doesn't, the damage is done. The UK has little choice now. It really must leave, so... Put on your seat belts. It's likely to be a wild ride. |
Re: EU Referendum
Out of curiosity, say an election is called, and one party (doesn't matter which) runs with "we will remain in the EU" as part of their platform. If that party gets voted in, would that 'nullify' the referendum? :confused:
|
Re: EU Referendum
Originally Posted by SchnookoLoly
(Post 12002490)
Out of curiosity, say an election is called, and one party (doesn't matter which) runs with "we will remain in the EU" as part of their platform. If that party gets voted in, would that 'nullify' the referendum? :confused:
In a word, yes. The referendum is not binding in the first place. |
Re: EU Referendum
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12002542)
In a word, yes. The referendum is not binding in the first place.
|
Re: EU Referendum
Yeh !!
British Lives Matter should get on this |
Re: EU Referendum
In case anyone is interested and you don't know, there is a new pop up newspaper called the New European for the 48%. They've committed to four issues. I subscribed for the online copy (GBP6 for all 4 issues). The second issues is out tomorrow I think:
Great magazines direct to your door - buyamag.co.uk The New European Newspaper Launches For EU Referendum Remain Voters Feeling 'Sense Of Loss' S |
Re: EU Referendum
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 12002762)
Err, I did mention that some days ago. What happened to the riots?
|
Re: EU Referendum
From Yes Minister writer Jonathan Lynn
Overheard in the men’s loo outside the cabinet room. :rofl::rofl::rofl: So reminds me of this Humphrey: We did cross swords when the Minister gave me a grilling over the estimates in the public accounts committee. Hacker: I wouldn't say that. Humphrey: Oh, you came up with all the questions I hoped nobody would ask. Hacker: Well, opposition's about asking awkward questions. Humphrey: And government is about not answering them. Hacker: Well, you answered all mine anyway. Humphrey: I'm glad you thought so Minister. :nod: |
Re: EU Referendum
|
Re: EU Referendum
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 12094958)
In other news, though, the GBP has rebounded slightly as a result of this news... been sitting around 1.24US most of today, the highest it's been in a month. |
Re: EU Referendum
The question was put.. "Does the government have the power to trigger article 50 without consulting parliament?"
High Court says "No" and the government will almost certainly appeal to the UK Supreme Court. One intriguing possibility after the appeal goes to the Supreme Court is that it's decision it may be referred upwards to the European Court for a final decision. Will anyone be happy with any ruling that they make? |
Re: EU Referendum
Originally Posted by dave_j
(Post 12094986)
The question was put.. "Does the government have the power to trigger article 50 without consulting parliament?"
High Court says "No" and the government will almost certainly appeal to the UK Supreme Court. One intriguing possibility after the appeal goes to the Supreme Court is that it's decision it may be referred upwards to the European Court for a final decision. Will anyone be happy with any ruling that they make? |
Re: EU Referendum
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 12095109)
The ECJ only has jurisdiction on EU law, not UK law. In that sense, the Supreme Court is the final arbiter.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 11:30 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.