![]() |
Re: Earthquakes
Originally Posted by gryphea
(Post 9240112)
I would think twice about living in the low lying areas (think Richmond). Very susceptible to liquefaction and failures due to amplification of motion at resonant frequencies similar to all the buildings.
Think Kobe, Mexico City and Alaska. I hadn't appreciated that the earthquake in Christchurch was actually an aftershock following a 7.1 shock in September last year centered 25 west of the city. Christchurch actually seems to be in a relatively high risk area. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Se...earthquake.jpg It seems that the building where most were killed, the CTV building, had been assessed following the Canterbury earthquake and declared structurally safe. Whether there was an error in the assessment or whether the codes were just not adequate will become known after investigation no doubt. |
Re: Earthquakes
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 9244133)
Yes high water table and silty sandy soils aren't a good combination in an earthquake.
I hadn't appreciated that the earthquake in Christchurch was actually an aftershock following a 7.1 shock in September last year centered 25 west of the city. Christchurch actually seems to be in a relatively high risk area. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Se...earthquake.jpg It seems that the building where most were killed, the CTV building, had been assessed following the Canterbury earthquake and declared structurally safe. Whether there was an error in the assessment or whether the codes were just not adequate will become known after investigation no doubt. Since the Sept quake there had been over 5,000 aftershocks in Chch until the big one of 6.3. Like anything with building it's a trade-off between making the building safe as possible vs expense. |
Re: Earthquakes
Originally Posted by Eastbound
(Post 9235902)
Afterwards OH went out and bought a shed load of antispeptic wet wipes , enough loo roll to last forever , and a wind up radio, I think he feels hes now done his bit .
|
Re: Earthquakes
This site is interesting. It gives a very powerful impression of the before and after.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/events/ja...eforeafter.htm |
Re: Earthquakes
Here is some more information the Earthquake on Sunday, March 20, 2011 at 04:20:39 UTC
Magnitude 4.4 Just off Vancouver Island. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquak...rld_canada.jpg More at: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquak...rld_canada.php |
Re: Earthquakes
Yet another earthquake this time in Myanmar (Burma) 6.8 on the Richter scale.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2...e-myanmar.html |
Re: Earthquakes
Another one in the Ottawa Valley yesterday. Only a little one (3.5) but uncomfortably close to Chalk River.
Is there some law that says nuclear reactors must be built on fault lines? |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:59 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.