British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   The Maple Leaf (https://britishexpats.com/forum/maple-leaf-98/)
-   -   Earthquakes (https://britishexpats.com/forum/maple-leaf-98/earthquakes-708934/)

ExKiwilass Mar 11th 2011 7:29 am

Re: Earthquakes
 
I"m freaked enough to be ordering a kit today :eek:

printer Mar 11th 2011 7:38 am

Re: Earthquakes
 
so to all those people that have said Kelowna is a bit far from any major cities and the coast. Have you changed your mind now? ;)

mandymoochops Mar 11th 2011 8:10 am

Re: Earthquakes
 
Living in the prairies really does have it's advantages.

Oink Mar 11th 2011 8:12 am

Re: Earthquakes
 

Originally Posted by mandymoochops (Post 9233609)
Living in the prairies really does have it's advantages.

Trust me, its a risk worth taking. ;)

Jingsamichty Mar 11th 2011 8:26 am

Re: Earthquakes
 
The oysters are better in the prairies.

Alan2005 Mar 11th 2011 8:46 am

Re: Earthquakes
 

Originally Posted by Jingsamichty (Post 9233633)
The oysters are better in the prairies.

Before I knew better I initially thought that prairie oyster was slang for snatch.

JonboyE Mar 11th 2011 9:09 am

Re: Earthquakes
 
"The big one" is due here sometime between now and the next 500 years. I have about 25 years left so I quite fancy my chances of avoiding it.

ExKiwilass Mar 11th 2011 9:24 am

Re: Earthquakes
 
TO all the smug people...Australians didn't think they'd get an earthquake, yet Newcastle had one. Christchurch was never supposed to get the big one...the fault line was unknown before Sept last year.

jimf Mar 11th 2011 9:41 am

Re: Earthquakes
 

Originally Posted by JonboyE (Post 9233700)
"The big one" is due here sometime between now and the next 500 years. I have about 25 years left so I quite fancy my chances of avoiding it.

37% of a 9+ event in the next 50 years.

Recent findings concluded the Cascadia subduction zone was more hazardous than previously suggested. The feared next major earthquake has some geologists predicting a 10 to 14% probability that the Cascadia Subduction Zone will produce an event of magnitude 9 or higher in the next 50 years,[9] although the most recent studies suggest that this risk could be as high as 37%.[10][11] Geologists have also determined the Pacific Northwest is not prepared for such a colossal earthquake. The tsunami produced may reach heights of approximately 30 meters (100 ft).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascadia_subduction_zone

Alan2005 Mar 11th 2011 9:50 am

Re: Earthquakes
 

Originally Posted by JonboyE (Post 9233700)
"The big one" is due here sometime between now and the next 500 years. I have about 25 years left so I quite fancy my chances of avoiding it.

I've still made sure I've got earthquake cover with my home insurance.

ExKiwilass Mar 11th 2011 10:14 am

Re: Earthquakes
 

Originally Posted by jimf (Post 9233744)
37% of a 9+ event in the next 50 years.

Recent findings concluded the Cascadia subduction zone was more hazardous than previously suggested. The feared next major earthquake has some geologists predicting a 10 to 14% probability that the Cascadia Subduction Zone will produce an event of magnitude 9 or higher in the next 50 years,[9] although the most recent studies suggest that this risk could be as high as 37%.[10][11] Geologists have also determined the Pacific Northwest is not prepared for such a colossal earthquake. The tsunami produced may reach heights of approximately 30 meters (100 ft).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascadia_subduction_zone


And they have been saying the same thing about WEllington for years yet Christchurch got it which no one saw coming.

jimf Mar 11th 2011 10:32 am

Re: Earthquakes
 

Originally Posted by Kiwilass (Post 9233792)
And they have been saying the same thing about WEllington for years yet Christchurch got it which no one saw coming.

http://geology.about.com/library/bl/...ustralesia.htm

Looking at this most of New Zealand is high/very high risk with a small area moderate. Is that where Christchurch is?

The4BellsLondon Mar 11th 2011 6:21 pm

Re: Earthquakes
 

Originally Posted by Kiwilass (Post 9233556)
I"m freaked enough to be ordering a kit today :eek:

YOu have? bloody hell I'd better get one 0 they sell em at the IGA for $40 a person!

el_richo Mar 12th 2011 3:55 am

Re: Earthquakes
 

Originally Posted by The4BellsLondon (Post 9234287)
YOu have? bloody hell I'd better get one 0 they sell em at the IGA for $40 a person!

$40? Sweet Jesus!!

I'm out his way today so i'm going to gradually move my stuff into Alan2005's basement/dungeon :thumbsup:

Don't tell him though............

james.mc Mar 12th 2011 6:29 am

Re: Earthquakes
 

Originally Posted by jimf (Post 9233744)
.....Geologists have also determined the Pacific Northwest is not prepared for such a colossal earthquake. The tsunami produced may reach heights of approximately 30 meters (100 ft).[/I]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascadia_subduction_zone....

Note to self.

Buy property on high ground ;)


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 4:36 am.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.