![]() |
Re: The country we left behind
I have no brief for politicians (least of all IDS) but let's not kid ourselves that civil service performance is all that it should be.
|
Re: The country we left behind
Originally Posted by Expatrick
(Post 12516658)
I have no brief for politicians (least of all IDS) but let's not kid ourselves that civil service performance is all that it should be.
|
Re: The country we left behind
It's hard to understand why Universal Credit has been so difficult to implement. They've thrown a lot of money and time at it. Doesn't Canada already have a UC type system?
|
Re: The country we left behind
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12518585)
It's hard to understand why Universal Credit has been so difficult to implement. They've thrown a lot of money and time at it. Doesn't Canada already have a UC type system?
"We don't like it so we'll make sure it doesn't work. We don't like the proposer so we'll make sure it doesn't work. We aren't paid enough so we'll make sure it doesn't work. There will be further opportunities for us if it doesn't work, so... We don't want to set a precedent by making it work. We don't think it will work and don't want the blame. We can drag this out until we get our pensions." ​​​​​ And so on. |
Re: The country we left behind
Or you could just ignore that people with expertise advise you that it doesn't work, pointing to the same thing being said previously but you went ahead and did it anyway and then replaced that non-working scheme with another scheme you were advised was also a bad idea but you went ahead with that anyway and so on.
And I'm not talking about implementation that some seem to think civil servants can obstruct like in some outdated fictional sitcom, I'm talking the effect of the schemes. DSS break up and formation of Contributions Agency; Child Support Agency; HMRC failing to run means tested benefits because they're not used to it; the failed Income Support system and failed JSA that replaced a decent Supplementary Benefit system, hence UC; The failed Social Fund loans system etc etc All the submissions from interested and appropriate organisations - NOT civil servants - saying bad idea, won't work, will create problems and all proven right every step of the way hence abolishing the new agencies set up and bringing in new systems...rinse and repeat. But blame the civil service instead and the government get off scot-free. :frown: |
Re: The country we left behind
Originally Posted by Expatrick
(Post 12518606)
UK civil service modus operandi -
"We don't like it so we'll make sure it doesn't work. We don't like the proposer so we'll make sure it doesn't work. We aren't paid enough so we'll make sure it doesn't work. There will be further opportunities for us if it doesn't work, so... We don't want to set a precedent by making it work. We don't think it will work and don't want the blame. We can drag this out until we get our pensions." ​​​​​ And so on. |
Re: The country we left behind
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 12518695)
But blame the civil service instead and the government get off scot-free. :frown:
|
Re: The country we left behind
Originally Posted by Souvy
(Post 12518696)
It's no different here. A classic example is the failed Phoenix pay system for public servants.It was initiated by he Conservative government and kicked-in under the new Liberal government. It's a disaster. Many believe that it was designed to fail.
|
Re: The country we left behind
Originally Posted by Expatrick
(Post 12518698)
The Govt. is subject to elections, the civil service is not.
Remind me, when did did anything to do with social security, family credit or child maintenance ever have anything to do with government losing an election? |
Re: The country we left behind
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 12518702)
Phew...well that's alright then.
Remind me, when did did anything to do with social security, family credit or child maintenance ever have anything to do with government losing an election? Oh & look at the effect "austerity" is having on the electorate. |
Re: The country we left behind
No good answers here. Benefits systems are complex, but we are first world countries with incredible computer expertise and high government budgets. I don't buy the internal sabotage explanation. I just really wonder why it can't be solved.
|
Re: The country we left behind
Esther McVey misled MPs over universal credit, says watchdog
Head of National Audit Office says the welfare secretary misinterpreted its report Sir Amyas Morse told the minister she had misinterpreted a report by the National Audit Office into universal credit to make it look as if the new welfare system was working well. It was the first time Morse had released personal correspondence with a minister...
In the letter, Morse makes clear he was writing because he had not been able to set up a meeting with McVey. (I wonder why) “I am now reluctantly writing to you to clarify the facts,†he wrote, saying the NAO’s report had been signed off on 8 June. “Our report was fully agreed with senior officials in your department. It is based on the most accurate and up to date information from your department … |
Re: The country we left behind
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 12527086)
Never mind all that though, it's all the fault of the civil servants. |
Re: The country we left behind
Originally Posted by Expatrick
(Post 12527191)
The policy, no. The implementation, undoubtedly.
the NAO had said the DWP should ensure it was working properly before transferring any more people on to it |
Re: The country we left behind
None of this is unusual. For around 13 weeks of the year when school is out, free meals are over – and family poverty across Britain is pitilessly exposed...testimony of a child vomiting “because their diet consisted entirely of crispsâ€, as well as a group of kids dropping out of a football tournament “as they had not eaten a meal†for days beforehand. “Their bodies simply gave up on them.†|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 3:11 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.