The Canadian Finance Thread
#121
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2010
Location: Durham Region Extension
Posts: 3,342
Re: The Canadian Finance Thread
#122
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 12,830
Re: The Canadian Finance Thread
If you pay 1c short of the balance due, you get dinged interest on the full amount, back to the day you bought the goods and for everything you buy from then on I believe.
#124
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 14,227
Re: The Canadian Finance Thread
No, you pay a few cents short of the entire balance, not what's due. I did this for 2 years and I never paid any interest.
#125
Re: The Canadian Finance Thread
Card user agreements were unilaterally changed to this maybe 5 years ago now...
#126
Re: The Canadian Finance Thread
Many car companies make more money on the finance than the profit on the car nowadays (GM finance for example), often they would rather you financed, so wont offer large discounts for cash.
#127
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 14,227
Re: The Canadian Finance Thread
I didn't know that - bastards. But, honestly, I never got charged any interest for doing so and I regularly had balances of around $2k. Nice guys at HSBC I guess.
#128
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 14,227
Re: The Canadian Finance Thread
Many places offer you discounts for finance.
#129
Re: The Canadian Finance Thread
In any case, the consumer credit industry is able to absorb losses on unsecured lending because they take a massive margin on the business they do. The sub prime crisis is not particularly relevant in this regard as there was a high degree of application fraud and the loans were artifically leveraged. I don't see Visa or MasterCard requiring any bailouts soon.
#130
Binned by Muderators
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 11,693
Re: The Canadian Finance Thread
We have two cards and use them regularly and pay them off each month on time. We owe nothing. The credit card company didn't understand it as we are in good standing with them. They say if I send 2 pay slips they will be able to sort it out but we will use our savings instead. Not as convenient.
#132
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2010
Location: Durham Region Extension
Posts: 3,342
Re: The Canadian Finance Thread
Interesting, hopefully the govt does the right thing if this ever happens again
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/repor...rticle5097436/
Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney said Thursday that despite considerable effort to prove otherwise, financial markets still doubt politicians have the courage to allow the biggest financial institutions to go bankrupt.
“It is not clear yet that too-big-to-fail has been ended,” said Mr. Carney, who doubles as the chairman of the Financial Stability Board, the Group of 20’s designated regulatory watchdog.
“It is not clear yet that too-big-to-fail has been ended,” said Mr. Carney, who doubles as the chairman of the Financial Stability Board, the Group of 20’s designated regulatory watchdog.
#134
Forum Regular
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 147
Re: The Canadian Finance Thread
I'll try to explain my thought process and if the reality differs then please correct me, because 1. I don't want to spread misinformation, and 2. it will help me as well to have a correct understanding of things.
My thinking was that the payment protection insurance premium is only applied to a credit card when one has a balance at the statement date. That has been my experience in the UK. In other words, when I have a balance at the statement date, the PPI premium is applied. If I have no balance at the statement date, then no PPI premium is applied. That has been the case even if I had spending in a given month that I repaid before the statement date.
My hunch is that if one pays off their credit card spending before the statement date each month (i.e. leaving no balance at the statement date), then they never incur the PPI premium. I also felt that there would surely be no value in having PPI because there would be no balance each month at the statement date to insure... but I'll correct myself on that shortly in a couple of ways.
I only have close-to-hand experience of the actual claim process in the UK too, which I realise doesn't account for much here in Canada, but my father was diagnosed with cancer while carrying a pretty substantial balance on his credit card and was signed off from work. While he was allowed to carry on using the card, on the condition that minimum payments from him would continue in addition to the coverage resulting from the insurance claim, the balance on the card as at the date of the insurance claim was the balance that was covered and therefore that was repaid incrementally over the following months (iirc this was 10% of that balance, per month). Any further spending was not covered, and would be repaid by him in the normal way.
Thus, if one repaid their credit card spending prior to the statement date, there'd be no balance showing on the statement, no balance being protected and the insurer would presumably have nothing to cover. And as I mentioned from my UK-based experience, no premium to pay. Something that occurs to me, a possible flaw in my thinking (in addition to any others that you might have picked up on?) is that the balance on a credit card as at the date of the insurance claim might not necessarily be the same as the balance (nil in this case) at the statement date, so it might be that you could have an insured balance at the claim date even if you generally repay your credit card prior to the statement date each month and technically never paid a premium. So I am likely wrong about that, first of all.
If you pay the balance after the statement date but before the due date, you pay the premium but from my point of view, paying out an insurance premium on a balance that I have the ability and willingness to cover seems like a waste of money but that's purely a matter of opinion and scale, so I hold my hands up and say I was wrong about that. And I guess that's the main reason you're taking issue with my post. I can only defend myself by saying that I am not a frequent or big-spending credit card user so my mindset will differ. But I gather from this thread that others do run their every expense through their credit card, which no doubt amounts to thousands on a monthly basis, and then pay it off each month, so having the insurance cover that in a bad situation would of course be a relief, allowing you to use the funds that you intended for that purpose to instead support yourself. Whether the cost/benefit in the long term balances out for each person is not for me to say, so I do admit I am wrong. Certainly the cost/benefit wasn't going to work out for me as a fairly minor spender and that was where I was coming from. Shot my mouth a bit there without thinking it through fully.
Hopefully that explains my post but, as I say, please put me right on things further if necessary.
I notice you also quoted the section of my post about credit bureau reporting but I'm hoping it was clear that I was just thinking aloud and not really stating cold hard facts about that. Can you shed any light on it? It's not clear if you were taking issue with any of that part.
Last edited by Deficient; Nov 8th 2012 at 11:38 am. Reason: Christ almighty, sorry this post is so long... I shall accept no claims for knackered scroll wheels, unless insured ;)
#135
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,710
Re: The Canadian Finance Thread
I'm in a similar boat. Earn more Aeroplan miles than I know what to do with. I certainly don't want to take flights with them - I don't need to, and anyway, they stiff you with fees and taxes anyway.
The gifts will only get delivered to a Canadian address, which I don't have.
The gifts will only get delivered to a Canadian address, which I don't have.