5 points for Investment Bond withdrawn Sept 07?? (PART TWO)
Dec 4th 2008, 9:09 pm
#826
You call that a moustache
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: Heading West..
Posts: 2,060
Re: 5 points for Investment Bond withdrawn Sept 07?? (PART TWO)
Sorry nothing for you guys in the 5/12/08 changes
Effective 5 December 2008
Effective 5 December 2008
Dec 4th 2008, 9:19 pm
#828
Forum Regular
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne, Austrlia
Posts: 169
Re: 5 points for Investment Bond withdrawn Sept 07?? (PART TWO)
I am depress now
Dec 4th 2008, 9:35 pm
#829
Forum Regular
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 105
Re: 5 points for Investment Bond withdrawn Sept 07?? (PART TWO)
I am willing to contribute towards the legal cost.
They have taken our money, asked us to incur various expenses, and have gone back on the deal. How dare they ask us to find these five points through some other route. We wouldn't have applied if we had known we wouldn't be able to obtain the five points through capital investment.
This is a breach of written and binding contract.
Dec 4th 2008, 9:40 pm
#830
Forum Regular
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 128
Re: 5 points for Investment Bond withdrawn Sept 07?? (PART TWO)
.............................................a year has gone by now. It took more than a year to make decision. I totally can't project my future.
Last edited by kenwen20; Dec 4th 2008 at 9:44 pm.
Dec 4th 2008, 9:46 pm
#831
Forum Regular
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 128
Re: 5 points for Investment Bond withdrawn Sept 07?? (PART TWO)
I agree its time to approach the courts (if that is allowed in our case).
I am willing to contribute towards the legal cost.
They have taken our money, asked us to incur various expenses, and have gone back on the deal. How dare they ask us to find these five points through some other route. We wouldn't have applied if we had known we wouldn't be able to obtain the five points through capital investment.
This is a breach of written and binding contract.
I am willing to contribute towards the legal cost.
They have taken our money, asked us to incur various expenses, and have gone back on the deal. How dare they ask us to find these five points through some other route. We wouldn't have applied if we had known we wouldn't be able to obtain the five points through capital investment.
This is a breach of written and binding contract.
Dec 4th 2008, 9:47 pm
#832
Forum Regular
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Living in Melbourne since 4 years.
Posts: 36
Re: 5 points for Investment Bond withdrawn Sept 07?? (PART TWO)
:curse::curse::
Dec 4th 2008, 9:52 pm
#833
Forum Regular
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 128
Re: 5 points for Investment Bond withdrawn Sept 07?? (PART TWO)
My life must move on, rejeck, reapply, refund, waive 5 points or reopen the treasury bond I don't care as long as it comes an answer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dec 4th 2008, 10:16 pm
#834
Just Joined
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 18
Re: 5 points for Investment Bond withdrawn Sept 07?? (PART TWO)
other thing is there are totally two kind of media 1 who support liberal 2 who support labour. contact to media who support liberal and expose these people. so once camera put focus constantly then they have to do something.
Dec 4th 2008, 10:48 pm
#835
Forum Regular
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 105
Re: 5 points for Investment Bond withdrawn Sept 07?? (PART TWO)
guys just make a group and then hire a migration lawyer and register case in a court atleast get positive or negative news this way u have to wait undefined timeframe at the end all affected person withdraw their application, find another way so all person will be in trouble who cant do anything. all afected person who applied through migration agent and who applied themselves just hire a best migration lawyers and drag them to court
other thing is there are totally two kind of media 1 who support liberal 2 who support labour. contact to media who support liberal and expose these people. so once camera put focus constantly then they have to do something.
other thing is there are totally two kind of media 1 who support liberal 2 who support labour. contact to media who support liberal and expose these people. so once camera put focus constantly then they have to do something.
The media is more interested in a handicapped child being refused visa or children being thrown overboard from boats.
We have been forgotten now. This issue is having no impact on the Minister, as there are no political consequences from it. It will remain this way.
The bureacrats within the immigration department have no sympathy with our plight after the NAB incident last year. Instead of helping to resolve the matter, the bureacrats are creating more hurdles for us.
We have to find out what options we have legally now. Nothing to lose now.
If nothing else, the the courts will ask the department to refund our application fee and other miscellaneious costs we have incurred so far.
Dec 4th 2008, 11:46 pm
#836
Forum Regular
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne, Austrlia
Posts: 169
Re: 5 points for Investment Bond withdrawn Sept 07?? (PART TWO)
It is getting worst.
Please send me email on
sankan1[at]tpg[dot]com[dot]au
who are in with all support without thinking of result
whoever lives overseas, your support is important
Its time to do or die.
Come What May
Please send me email on
sankan1[at]tpg[dot]com[dot]au
who are in with all support without thinking of result
whoever lives overseas, your support is important
Its time to do or die.
Come What May
Dec 5th 2008, 12:07 am
#837
Forum Regular
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne, Austrlia
Posts: 169
Re: 5 points for Investment Bond withdrawn Sept 07?? (PART TWO)
Here is the proof, we can make a court case
************************************************** ****
"Now the High Court Drama
An application has been lodged with the High Court of Australia last week for a student who had been rejected by DIAC after completing the Advanced Diploma of Hospitality Management at Carrick. This challenge goes to the heart of the issue of DIAC’s demand that students complete a CRICOS course or courses which would at up to at least 92 weeks of study.
If the application is successful it will mean DIAC’s policy of 92 week CRICOS duration will be invalid and the former Carrick’s students application will continue to be processed. It will also mean that all EGSM visa applicants who have their applications rejected based upon the 2 year study issue will benefit by making DIAC’s policy invalid.
This story will be continued:"
************************************************** *******
this post is a part of email I receive from www.australiavisa.com on 4 th of December.
I dont know what this case is about. if they can register case in high court, we can as well.
************************************************** ****
"Now the High Court Drama
An application has been lodged with the High Court of Australia last week for a student who had been rejected by DIAC after completing the Advanced Diploma of Hospitality Management at Carrick. This challenge goes to the heart of the issue of DIAC’s demand that students complete a CRICOS course or courses which would at up to at least 92 weeks of study.
If the application is successful it will mean DIAC’s policy of 92 week CRICOS duration will be invalid and the former Carrick’s students application will continue to be processed. It will also mean that all EGSM visa applicants who have their applications rejected based upon the 2 year study issue will benefit by making DIAC’s policy invalid.
This story will be continued:"
************************************************** *******
this post is a part of email I receive from www.australiavisa.com on 4 th of December.
I dont know what this case is about. if they can register case in high court, we can as well.
Dec 5th 2008, 1:17 am
#838
You call that a moustache
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: Heading West..
Posts: 2,060
Re: 5 points for Investment Bond withdrawn Sept 07?? (PART TWO)
Here is the proof, we can make a court case
************************************************** ****
"Now the High Court Drama
An application has been lodged with the High Court of Australia last week for a student who had been rejected by DIAC after completing the Advanced Diploma of Hospitality Management at Carrick. This challenge goes to the heart of the issue of DIAC’s demand that students complete a CRICOS course or courses which would at up to at least 92 weeks of study.
If the application is successful it will mean DIAC’s policy of 92 week CRICOS duration will be invalid and the former Carrick’s students application will continue to be processed. It will also mean that all EGSM visa applicants who have their applications rejected based upon the 2 year study issue will benefit by making DIAC’s policy invalid.
This story will be continued:"
************************************************** *******
this post is a part of email I receive from www.australiavisa.com on 4 th of December.
I dont know what this case is about. if they can register case in high court, we can as well.
************************************************** ****
"Now the High Court Drama
An application has been lodged with the High Court of Australia last week for a student who had been rejected by DIAC after completing the Advanced Diploma of Hospitality Management at Carrick. This challenge goes to the heart of the issue of DIAC’s demand that students complete a CRICOS course or courses which would at up to at least 92 weeks of study.
If the application is successful it will mean DIAC’s policy of 92 week CRICOS duration will be invalid and the former Carrick’s students application will continue to be processed. It will also mean that all EGSM visa applicants who have their applications rejected based upon the 2 year study issue will benefit by making DIAC’s policy invalid.
This story will be continued:"
************************************************** *******
this post is a part of email I receive from www.australiavisa.com on 4 th of December.
I dont know what this case is about. if they can register case in high court, we can as well.
Dec 5th 2008, 1:18 am
#839
Forum Regular
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 105
Re: 5 points for Investment Bond withdrawn Sept 07?? (PART TWO)
Here is the proof, we can make a court case
************************************************** ****
"Now the High Court Drama
An application has been lodged with the High Court of Australia last week for a student who had been rejected by DIAC after completing the Advanced Diploma of Hospitality Management at Carrick. This challenge goes to the heart of the issue of DIAC’s demand that students complete a CRICOS course or courses which would at up to at least 92 weeks of study.
If the application is successful it will mean DIAC’s policy of 92 week CRICOS duration will be invalid and the former Carrick’s students application will continue to be processed. It will also mean that all EGSM visa applicants who have their applications rejected based upon the 2 year study issue will benefit by making DIAC’s policy invalid.
This story will be continued:"
************************************************** *******
this post is a part of email I receive from www.australiavisa.com on 4 th of December.
I dont know what this case is about. if they can register case in high court, we can as well.
************************************************** ****
"Now the High Court Drama
An application has been lodged with the High Court of Australia last week for a student who had been rejected by DIAC after completing the Advanced Diploma of Hospitality Management at Carrick. This challenge goes to the heart of the issue of DIAC’s demand that students complete a CRICOS course or courses which would at up to at least 92 weeks of study.
If the application is successful it will mean DIAC’s policy of 92 week CRICOS duration will be invalid and the former Carrick’s students application will continue to be processed. It will also mean that all EGSM visa applicants who have their applications rejected based upon the 2 year study issue will benefit by making DIAC’s policy invalid.
This story will be continued:"
************************************************** *******
this post is a part of email I receive from www.australiavisa.com on 4 th of December.
I dont know what this case is about. if they can register case in high court, we can as well.
Having said that, there is a strong likelihood that the Courts will direct the department to either give the applicants avenues to make the capital investment or refund the costs incurred by applicants thusfar.
My guess is the department will go down the latter path.
This is my hypothetical reasoning. Would love to hear from others on this as well.
Dec 5th 2008, 1:31 am
#840
Forum Regular
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 128
Re: 5 points for Investment Bond withdrawn Sept 07?? (PART TWO)
listen guys. From my point of view. We must urge DIAC for open communication to us and knowing what they have done for the whole year regarding our issue.
We don't bring this to court with blind sourse without knowing who caused the main process extremely slow down like this. And whoever in charge of the negotiation in between DIAC and treasury should take a certain degree of resbonsibilities.
If they come up with excuse like "too busy". Then we need to know our priority of resolution and see if it is being reasonable for the arrangement.
If we have got no explaination for the delay and suffered from unfriendly communication.Then we have no choise to bring this to court.
Also, I am wondering how reliable the official that delegats met in Canberra. Is that mean we have been misleading or otherwise he has been misleading by higher ranking official? No clues........
We don't bring this to court with blind sourse without knowing who caused the main process extremely slow down like this. And whoever in charge of the negotiation in between DIAC and treasury should take a certain degree of resbonsibilities.
If they come up with excuse like "too busy". Then we need to know our priority of resolution and see if it is being reasonable for the arrangement.
If we have got no explaination for the delay and suffered from unfriendly communication.Then we have no choise to bring this to court.
Also, I am wondering how reliable the official that delegats met in Canberra. Is that mean we have been misleading or otherwise he has been misleading by higher ranking official? No clues........