What to expect from the NHS !
#16
Thread Starter
Forum Regular



Joined: May 2006
Posts: 148








Originally Posted by dbd33
If you publish a polemic you should be willing to defend the views expressed. Your comparison of the treatment of people and dogs is fatuous; even given the unlimited funding the dog has a person will still get treatment under the NHS that is unavailable to the dog. My mother has just had her hip replaced at the age of 82; they give up treating dogs long before they get similarly old. Reading between the lines of your post attacking asylum seekers I discern attitudes ill suited to someone using "Canada" as part of his poster name. Canada is about immigration, it's not a place where one's "countrymen come first" as there are no countrymen, they're all dead. What there is now is immigrants, the very people you don't seem to like in the UK. Your opinion may be valid, Ernst Zundel's opinion is valid, but it's out of step with Canada and, indeed, it's out of step with civilization. It is however, nicely in accord with the Daily Mail; fortunately there's now an overseas edition of that paper.
Wigin Bob, that better for you...
#17
Originally Posted by Canada Bob
Kinell, now were getting a thesis on it, I don't have time for the playground attitudes and your attempt at derison, I'll go for a pint, you go jump off a cliff... or Get a life...
Wigin Bob, that better for you...
Wigin Bob, that better for you...
#18
Originally Posted by kt0157
Afghanistan does. So does Jamaica (although not officially). In Iraq you can get shot for selling falafels.
I think they have to legislate for hate crimes when people take their information from BNP leaflets.
Well that would be just dandy if the asylum seekers were allowed to work and pay taxes like the rest of us. But Daily Mail readers made that politically impossible.
I agree with you on one point. You are old school: it hasn't been the EEC for 15 years. It's the European Union. EU.
No, I wanted to point out that you used the phrase "asylum seeker" as a term of abuse. You demonized a whole class of people without knowing anything about their predicament. The best education you could receive is for you yourself to be a victim of the kind of abuse these people are fleeing. Short of me coming around to your house and attaching electrodes to your testicles, I can't see that happening in the UK for the time being.
Well, sort of. You aren't allowed to incite racial hatred.
Any country signed up to the UN convention on the rights of refugees will provide for refugees. Canada will. The UK will. France, Sweden, Germany, Italy will. New Zealand will.
Well, I bet I've paid more tax you. So do I get preferential treatment over you? No. I get taxed according to my earnings, and other people receive according to their need. I think I pay too much tax, as it happens, and I think the Government is way too keen to chuck my (and your) money in places it isn't needed. But I don't have any problem helping people fleeing torture get back on their feet. Once they are on their feet, they get treated just like everyone else.
Nope, charity begins with need.
K.
I think they have to legislate for hate crimes when people take their information from BNP leaflets.
Well that would be just dandy if the asylum seekers were allowed to work and pay taxes like the rest of us. But Daily Mail readers made that politically impossible.
I agree with you on one point. You are old school: it hasn't been the EEC for 15 years. It's the European Union. EU.
No, I wanted to point out that you used the phrase "asylum seeker" as a term of abuse. You demonized a whole class of people without knowing anything about their predicament. The best education you could receive is for you yourself to be a victim of the kind of abuse these people are fleeing. Short of me coming around to your house and attaching electrodes to your testicles, I can't see that happening in the UK for the time being.
Well, sort of. You aren't allowed to incite racial hatred.
Any country signed up to the UN convention on the rights of refugees will provide for refugees. Canada will. The UK will. France, Sweden, Germany, Italy will. New Zealand will.
Well, I bet I've paid more tax you. So do I get preferential treatment over you? No. I get taxed according to my earnings, and other people receive according to their need. I think I pay too much tax, as it happens, and I think the Government is way too keen to chuck my (and your) money in places it isn't needed. But I don't have any problem helping people fleeing torture get back on their feet. Once they are on their feet, they get treated just like everyone else.
Nope, charity begins with need.
K.
That's a great response K - thank you
#19










Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,715

Bob, if you ever need a hip replacement, I know a good vet.
#20
BE Forum Addict






Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,010











Originally Posted by hot wasabi peas
Bob, if you ever need a hip replacement, I know a good vet.
I had a tick on my leg (fortunately not infected with Lyme's Disease). I had tried an ice cube, petroleum jelly, hot needle, to make the little swine let go. He didn't. He just died. So I had to go to A&E to get Mr. Tick's jaws dug out. The doctor said he'd never treated anyone for a tick before, and that I was better off going to a vet.
Alas, in this litigation-frenzy era no vet would treat me. In the end I had an incredibly painful anaesthetic jab (that doesn't make sense!) and a scalpel slicing Mr. Tick's remains from my leg.
K.
#21
BE Forum Addict






Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,664
From: Ottawa











As someone who has worked in both the NHS and Canadian healthcare I can say that the NHS is a much superior system. I'm fed up with people feeding off the UK media wagon that jumps on any negative story about the NHS and pumps it up into something huge. Canada Bob, how much have YOU used the NHS?
Yes, the NHS may appear to be underfunded, but that's because of the ever increasing numbers of people who
a) don't turn up to appointments
b) waste clinicians' time through turning up at A&E to have something checked out that the family doctor could've done
c) hypochondriacs, abusive drunken louts who've fallen over or gotten in a fight and
d) people who don't take responsibility for their own health and expect others to pick up the pieces for them when things go wrong.
I've come across them all and believe me, it's incredibly irritating as a clinician to have to kill time because some pratt couldn't be bothered turning up for an apppointment. And don't give it the "but you can never get an appointment" crap - yes you can if you NEED it! Compared with Canada where thousands, if not millions, of people don't actually have a family doctor, we do OK in the UK. And the UK has just about double the population of Canada, so the NHS is treating a hell of a lot more people. A lot of very dedicated people work in the NHS and pull out the stops when people NEED a service.
Take into consideration the advances in medical technology and the much superior team approach to working with patients (unlike here where it's very much old school bowing to the doctor for all the decision-making), people are now living much longer, despite the increase in chronic conditions, and are requiring more care at home and more equipment - this is all provided free in the UK - you have to pay in Canada (well, Ontario anyway) for home equipment, eg. powered bath seat - Canada $1500, NHS free.
I have animals that came with me from the UK and have required veterinary care in both countries - the vet system is totally privately funded in both countries and operates within the private sector, so of course the vet is going to carry out an operation asap as he knows you'll go elsewhere if he/she doesn't!
A poor comparison overall - and don't get on your high horse about tongue-in-cheek humour or it was a comment made only for a laugh. Joking about the system that I put heart and soul into for 12 years for patients I cared deeply about is no laughing matter when ignorant types like you decide to slag it off. And most of my NHS colleagues felt the same way.
Yes, the NHS may appear to be underfunded, but that's because of the ever increasing numbers of people who
a) don't turn up to appointments
b) waste clinicians' time through turning up at A&E to have something checked out that the family doctor could've done
c) hypochondriacs, abusive drunken louts who've fallen over or gotten in a fight and
d) people who don't take responsibility for their own health and expect others to pick up the pieces for them when things go wrong.
I've come across them all and believe me, it's incredibly irritating as a clinician to have to kill time because some pratt couldn't be bothered turning up for an apppointment. And don't give it the "but you can never get an appointment" crap - yes you can if you NEED it! Compared with Canada where thousands, if not millions, of people don't actually have a family doctor, we do OK in the UK. And the UK has just about double the population of Canada, so the NHS is treating a hell of a lot more people. A lot of very dedicated people work in the NHS and pull out the stops when people NEED a service.
Take into consideration the advances in medical technology and the much superior team approach to working with patients (unlike here where it's very much old school bowing to the doctor for all the decision-making), people are now living much longer, despite the increase in chronic conditions, and are requiring more care at home and more equipment - this is all provided free in the UK - you have to pay in Canada (well, Ontario anyway) for home equipment, eg. powered bath seat - Canada $1500, NHS free.
I have animals that came with me from the UK and have required veterinary care in both countries - the vet system is totally privately funded in both countries and operates within the private sector, so of course the vet is going to carry out an operation asap as he knows you'll go elsewhere if he/she doesn't!
A poor comparison overall - and don't get on your high horse about tongue-in-cheek humour or it was a comment made only for a laugh. Joking about the system that I put heart and soul into for 12 years for patients I cared deeply about is no laughing matter when ignorant types like you decide to slag it off. And most of my NHS colleagues felt the same way.
#22
BE Forum Addict






Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,010











Originally Posted by TrishB
Take into consideration the advances in medical technology and the much superior team approach to working with patients (unlike here where it's very much old school bowing to the doctor for all the decision-making), people are now living much longer, despite the increase in chronic conditions, and are requiring more care at home and more equipment - this is all provided free in the UK - you have to pay in Canada (well, Ontario anyway) for home equipment, eg. powered bath seat - Canada $1500, NHS free.
K.
#23
Originally Posted by kt0157
I once was told to go to a vet by an A&E doctor.
I had a tick on my leg (fortunately not infected with Lyme's Disease). I had tried an ice cube, petroleum jelly, hot needle, to make the little swine let go. He didn't. He just died. So I had to go to A&E to get Mr. Tick's jaws dug out. The doctor said he'd never treated anyone for a tick before, and that I was better off going to a vet.
Alas, in this litigation-frenzy era no vet would treat me. In the end I had an incredibly painful anaesthetic jab (that doesn't make sense!) and a scalpel slicing Mr. Tick's remains from my leg.
K.
I had a tick on my leg (fortunately not infected with Lyme's Disease). I had tried an ice cube, petroleum jelly, hot needle, to make the little swine let go. He didn't. He just died. So I had to go to A&E to get Mr. Tick's jaws dug out. The doctor said he'd never treated anyone for a tick before, and that I was better off going to a vet.
Alas, in this litigation-frenzy era no vet would treat me. In the end I had an incredibly painful anaesthetic jab (that doesn't make sense!) and a scalpel slicing Mr. Tick's remains from my leg.
K.
#24
Originally Posted by kt0157
The NHS has its issues (many of which appear to be caused by politicians sticking their oar in and causing turmoil), but its coverage is excellent. If you want to see what's covered on other healthcare systems take a look at the notes accompanying your E111 form (as it used to be) to see what people in the rest of the EU (or EEC if you're Canada Bob) have to pay. For example, usually ambulance cover is not part of European healthcare systems (out-of-province ambulance isn't usually covered in Canada, either).
K.
K.
#25
Just Joined

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 28



So is the NHS better than the Canadian healthcare system
#26
Originally Posted by Hit&Run
So is the NHS better than the Canadian healthcare system
#27
BE Enthusiast




Joined: May 2005
Posts: 308
From: Winnipeg, MB











Originally Posted by kt0157
The best education you could receive is for you yourself to be a victim of the kind of abuse these people are fleeing. Short of me coming around to your house and attaching electrodes to your testicles, I can't see that happening in the UK for the time being.
All Bob was trying to do was point out what could be considered an ironic situation.
Get off his case!
Last edited by dormy; Jun 29th 2006 at 2:05 am.
#28
Thread Starter
Forum Regular



Joined: May 2006
Posts: 148








Originally Posted by kt0157
I agree with you on one point. You are old school: it hasn't been the EEC for 15 years. It's the European Union. EU.
No, I wanted to point out that you used the phrase "asylum seeker" as a term of abuse. You demonized a whole class of people without knowing anything about their predicament. The best education you could receive is for you yourself to be a victim of the kind of abuse these people are fleeing. Short of me coming around to your house and attaching electrodes to your testicles, I can't see that happening in the UK for the time being.
Well, sort of. You aren't allowed to incite racial hatred.
Any country signed up to the UN convention on the rights of refugees will provide for refugees. Canada will. The UK will. France, Sweden, Germany, Italy will. New Zealand will. Well, I bet I've paid more tax you. So do I get preferential treatment over you? No. I get taxed according to my earnings, and other people receive according to their need. I think I pay too much tax, as it happens, and I think the Government is way too keen to chuck my (and your) money in places it isn't needed. But I don't have any problem helping people fleeing torture get back on their feet. Once they are on their feet, they get treated just like everyone else. Nope, charity begins with need.
K.
No, I wanted to point out that you used the phrase "asylum seeker" as a term of abuse. You demonized a whole class of people without knowing anything about their predicament. The best education you could receive is for you yourself to be a victim of the kind of abuse these people are fleeing. Short of me coming around to your house and attaching electrodes to your testicles, I can't see that happening in the UK for the time being.
Well, sort of. You aren't allowed to incite racial hatred.
Any country signed up to the UN convention on the rights of refugees will provide for refugees. Canada will. The UK will. France, Sweden, Germany, Italy will. New Zealand will. Well, I bet I've paid more tax you. So do I get preferential treatment over you? No. I get taxed according to my earnings, and other people receive according to their need. I think I pay too much tax, as it happens, and I think the Government is way too keen to chuck my (and your) money in places it isn't needed. But I don't have any problem helping people fleeing torture get back on their feet. Once they are on their feet, they get treated just like everyone else. Nope, charity begins with need.
K.
You don't think I'm handing in Homework for your approval do you !
Who's all these "people fleeing torture" that you're on about, I think you need to speak to the lads at Manchester Airport in the Immigration Control. I've known one of them for a long time, and you should hear what they think about the reality, not your spin of it.
What's this about "you'll bet you've paid more tax than me" what do you know about me ?
Seeing as you brought money up, the probability is...
I'd bet I could buy an' bleedin sell you with my pocket change, you brought up the inference but beware, the reality would embarrass you.
I'd go point to point with you but yer not worth it, another PC maniac gagging for a platform by the sound off from.
Get a life, relax, ease off a bit, who the bollocks do YOU think you are !!!
It's not a class room in here, its not your job to mark folks up or correct them, I {like anyone else} am entitled to see the world the way that I do, so if you're looking for someone to walk over, you picked the wrong bloke, go vent yer spleen on someone else.
What's with this talk of testicles, electrodes and wallet sizes, some kind of penis envy you've got going ? Tell you what, save yourself a journey, connect the electrodes to yer own testicles, I wouldn't want you near mine, I'm not into that sort of thing...
Wigin Bob...
#29
Originally Posted by dormy
If anyone on this forum can talk about government supported persecution against himself or his family, then its Canada Bob, he has been through worse situations than many of us could ever imagine. He stood up and fought for what he believed was right, at a fery real risk to his own and his familys lives.
All Bob was trying to do was point out what could be considered an ironic situation.
Get off his case!
All Bob was trying to do was point out what could be considered an ironic situation.
Get off his case!

#30
Originally Posted by Canada Bob
I'd go point to point with you but yer not worth it, another PC maniac gagging for a platform by the sound off from.



