Vancouver 'mind-numbingly boring?
#106
I have a friend who left San Diego in a hurry and moved to Canada in 1970 and didn't go back until the 80's to get his dishonorable discharge and his pardon (you had to go back to the base you left from). He was so scared it was all a trick and they were going to put him in Leavenworth that he took his wife and kids with him so he'd at least be able to kiss them goodbye. There's Marineland and there's Marineland. He came back and said he couldn't believe it, "Even the Sergeants were nice!" He was one of the lucky ones as pardons for USMC deserters didn't come as easily as for draft evaders. He made a good Canadian and we could use more like him.
To thine own self be true.
To thine own self be true.
#107
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 465











Different strokes for different folks.
I personally don't find it mind numbingly boring. Plenty to do, and it is a beautiful city. The pub/bar scene is a bit weak. But if you explore, you can find some good pubs/nightlife. Just not that obvious when you first arrive.
I personally don't find it mind numbingly boring. Plenty to do, and it is a beautiful city. The pub/bar scene is a bit weak. But if you explore, you can find some good pubs/nightlife. Just not that obvious when you first arrive.
#108
I don't get this "beautiful city" thing at all. The setting would be nice if the city wasn't there but the city itself is just concrete towers; I understand that it's new and architecture isn't a Canadian thing but it's not a more beautiful city than, say, Reading or Basingstoke.
#109
Thread Starter
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0











I don't get this "beautiful city" thing at all. The setting would be nice if the city wasn't there but the city itself is just concrete towers; I understand that it's new and architecture isn't a Canadian thing but it's not a more beautiful city than, say, Reading or Basingstoke.
#110
I don't get this "beautiful city" thing at all. The setting would be nice if the city wasn't there but the city itself is just concrete towers; I understand that it's new and architecture isn't a Canadian thing but it's not a more beautiful city than, say, Reading or Basingstoke.
#111
BE Forum Addict






Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,380
From: British Columbia











The point of Vancouver isn't to immerse yourself in its infrastructure, it's about having that infrastructure within close proximity to wilderness - mountains, oceans, fjords, islands, rivers, lakes, rainforest, beaches. You have conveniences of a big city if you want to shop, eat at good restaurants, see theatre, a movie, an art exhibit, a concert, etc. but you can easily vacate the city for the wilderness in 30 minutes or less. Very few cities offer the diversity of wilderness that Vancouver has, and that wilderness is very much a part of the reason why people move to Vancouver. It's the natural environment that has created Vancouver's lifestyle. People don't move to this city to limit themselves to the urban environment, or they're missing the point and are likely miserable. To enjoy Vancouver, you must have an appreciation for nature and a desire to immerse yourself in that environment, a desire to spend your evenings on the beach, your weekends hiking and kayaking and sailing and skiing. Amusement park style entertainment attractions or large museums are not Vancouver's forte. Vancouver is a terrible place to be entertained, but it's a spectacular place to explore and connect with nature.
Last edited by Lychee; Jun 9th 2015 at 9:22 am.
#112
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 465











I don't get this "beautiful city" thing at all. The setting would be nice if the city wasn't there but the city itself is just concrete towers; I understand that it's new and architecture isn't a Canadian thing but it's not a more beautiful city than, say, Reading or Basingstoke.
And when people talk about Vancouver being a beautiful city, I doubt they are talking about the architecture and buildings!
#113
BE Enthusiast




Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 465











The point of Vancouver isn't to immerse yourself in its infrastructure, it's about having that infrastructure within close proximity to wilderness - mountains, oceans, fjords, islands, rivers, lakes, rainforest, beaches. You have conveniences of a big city if you want to shop, eat at good restaurants, see theatre, a movie, an art exhibit, a concert, etc. but you can easily vacate the city for the wilderness in 30 minutes or less. Very few cities offer the diversity of wilderness that Vancouver has, and that wilderness is very much a part of the reason why people move to Vancouver. It's the natural environment that has created Vancouver's lifestyle. People don't move to this city to limit themselves to the urban environment, or they're missing the point and are likely miserable. To enjoy Vancouver, you must have an appreciation for nature and a desire to immerse yourself in that environment, a desire to spend your evenings on the beach, your weekends hiking and kayaking and sailing and skiing. Amusement park style entertainment attractions or large museums are not Vancouver's forte. Vancouver is a terrible place to be entertained, but it's a spectacular place to explore and connect with nature.
#114
Personally I'd appreciate the place for just not having the snow we get over here.
#115
BE Forum Addict






Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,380
From: British Columbia











True. And if you don't have the money, it costs very little to sit on the beach or go for walks in the forest. I don't ski, I don't kayak, but I frequently walk along the seawall, spend the day at the beach, or head into the mountains where it's free to enjoy. It costs money to buy a house here and to afford the luxury lifestyle of boats and skis, certainly, but if you're renting or you downscale from sprawling home to modest condo, day to day living costs aren't any more than anywhere else. Heating costs are minimal and there's no need for air conditioning. Locally grown food is affordable when you shop at smaller family-owned supermarkets. Real estate is truly what makes it unaffordable compared to other places in the country. But you have to want the lifestyle to make it worth it.
#117
Binned by Muderators










Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,708
From: White Rock BC











In the West End (residential district close to Downtown, Stanley Park and beaches) one bedroom apartments start around $1,150 to $1,200. These are usually older buildings so probably not have a pool or gym. It is perfectly possible to live car-free here.
There are similar starting prices in other parts of Vancouver and it can be cheaper if you brave the suburbs. That said, you can pay a lot more if you want.
There are similar starting prices in other parts of Vancouver and it can be cheaper if you brave the suburbs. That said, you can pay a lot more if you want.
#118
BE Enthusiast





Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 888
From: 100 mile house BC (tiz a long way away from devon)











Hi
Maybe all the negative waves will help reduce the number of people who keep moving here,
it's getting a bit busy now.
i have only been here about 8 yrs but i can see the changes.
jerry
Maybe all the negative waves will help reduce the number of people who keep moving here,
it's getting a bit busy now.
i have only been here about 8 yrs but i can see the changes.
jerry
#119
Someone is lining their pockets just not the 99%.
When I first visited Vancouver in 2003 they had a Hooters. It was my first taste of North American culinary and it has stayed with me to this day.
#120




