![]() |
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
Originally Posted by BWelford
(Post 6676568)
Today 10 Downing Street responded to a petition that closed on 11 June 2008 from Roy and Joan Brentnall of Canada. It asked the Prime Minister to remove the discrimination against British State pensioners who retire to the Commonwealth countries rather than Europe or the USA. It has taken over 60 days to produce a response.
It is largely a copy and paste version of what was given to a petition on January third of this year. |
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
Come on admit it you're enjoying it. ;):p:rofl::rofl: |
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
Originally Posted by Steve_P
(Post 6676891)
You don't hate say it at all.
Come on admit it you're enjoying it. ;):p:rofl::rofl: Anyway, Ive been waiting in the wings of the forum for something new and or interesting to come up, and it hasnt, so I guess this could well be my "YAGE" post. But who knows, I might pop back in from time to time, but nothing like in the past. Good luck! |
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 6676910)
Anyway, Ive been waiting in the wings of the forum for something new and or interesting to come up, and it hasnt, so I guess this could well be my "YAGE" post. But who knows, I might pop back in from time to time, but nothing like in the past. Good luck!
You will be missed. :( |
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
Originally Posted by johnh009
(Post 6676676)
With all of the boomers retiring and, given the sad state of pension funds and savings in general, they are more likely to stop indexing-linking the countries that are, rather than index link those that are not.
Pensions should not be funded by current and future taxpayers but from the returns on the money invested by those who contributed. |
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
Originally Posted by flashman
(Post 6677309)
Does that prove the mismanagement of the pension funds?
Pensions should not be funded by current and future taxpayers but from the returns on the money invested by those who contributed. |
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
Pensions are paid out of the National Insurance Fund, which has a huge surplus, which is used for other purposes than pensions although it was funded by all those pensioners contributions. You can find more information at the Pension Parity UK website at http://www.pension-parity-uk.com/home. If you go to the relevant page on the National Insurance Fund, you will be outraged at what you see there.
|
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
<BC is indeed outrageous>
|
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
I'm outraged by the shoddy quality of that site. It's all CAPITAL LETTERS and tabloidesque phraseology. You might get a better response if you could come up with something less OTT.
|
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
Sorry, bazzz. I agree with you on presentation. I was in no way involved with that website. However I believe the facts it presents are true.
|
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
Originally Posted by Steve_P
(Post 6676806)
It was a joke for goodness sake.
I have no intention of claiming something I left 45 years ago. I have no wish to sponge off the UK. |
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
Originally Posted by Simon Legree
(Post 6677494)
You wouldn't be sponging. You already paid for it and are entitled to it.
I would be sponging if I were to attempt to collect on that. :curse::curse: |
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
Originally Posted by bazzz
(Post 6677445)
I'm outraged by the shoddy quality of that site. It's all CAPITAL LETTERS and tabloidesque phraseology. You might get a better response if you could come up with something less OTT.
|
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
Originally Posted by Simon Legree
(Post 6676783)
This petition, complete with the glaring spelling mistake, was a private initiative but at least someone tried to do something on your behalf.
<rant continues for one single very long paragraph> I moved to Canada in the full knowledge that my state pension wouldn't be index linked. I have taken account of that fact and made other arrangements. Nothing is going to change as a result of stupid on-line petitions. Nobody with anything more productive to do pays any attention to them anyway. |
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
Originally Posted by Simon Legree
(Post 6677494)
You wouldn't be sponging. You already paid for it and are entitled to it.
In fact, it is absolutely shameless. Have a bit of dignity and self-respect. Stop trying to squeeze British taxpayers for more cash for yourself. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 1:38 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.