Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
#1
Thread Starter
Just Joined

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 24
From: Langley, BC, Canada

Today 10 Downing Street responded to a petition that closed on 11 June 2008 from Roy and Joan Brentnall of Canada. It asked the Prime Minister to remove the discrimination against British State pensioners who retire to the Commonwealth countries rather than Europe or the USA. It has taken over 60 days to produce a response.
It is largely a copy and paste version of what was given to a petition on January third of this year. Perhaps as a signal of the priority given to UK pensioners, even the copy and pasting created an unintelligible sentence.
Meanwhile 10 Downing Street is now Twittering, another attention-getting activity to take them away from the real priorities.
It is largely a copy and paste version of what was given to a petition on January third of this year. Perhaps as a signal of the priority given to UK pensioners, even the copy and pasting created an unintelligible sentence.
Meanwhile 10 Downing Street is now Twittering, another attention-getting activity to take them away from the real priorities.
#2
<pulls out the popcorn, sits and waits!>
#6
May I be the first to suggest that there's no injustice here? If British pensioners living in Canada would like their pensions index linked they should move elsewhere. Furthermore, the British public is never going to be receptive to the idea of paying more to people who have voluntarily left, not to say abandoned, their country.
This argument is like marital sex, it's all a bit rote but there's still some fun in it.
This argument is like marital sex, it's all a bit rote but there's still some fun in it.
#7
<petulant mode>
It's soooo unfair
</petulant mode>
It's soooo unfair

</petulant mode>
#8
Thread Starter
Just Joined

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 24
From: Langley, BC, Canada

The discrimination against UK pensioners in Commonwealth countries in freezing pensions at retirement age levels is grossly unfair. I live in Langley BC, Canada. If I had chosen to live in Bellingham, Washington, USA just 40 miles away or 1 hour by car, then I would be receiving exactly the same pension treatment as if I still lived in the UK. Equally if I had travelled east rather than west and lived in Berlin, Germany, at almost the same latitude as Langley, then I would be receiving exactly the same pension treatment as if I still lived in the UK.
#9










Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 15,883

To the OP.
You have 20 posts on this website and everyone of them is complaining about this perceived injustice.
Have you nothing else going on in your life or is this topic all encompassing?
You have 20 posts on this website and everyone of them is complaining about this perceived injustice.
Have you nothing else going on in your life or is this topic all encompassing?
#10
The discrimination against UK pensioners in Commonwealth countries in freezing pensions at retirement age levels is grossly unfair. I live in Langley BC, Canada. If I had chosen to live in Bellingham, Washington, USA just 40 miles away or 1 hour by car, then I would be receiving exactly the same pension treatment as if I still lived in the UK. Equally if I had travelled east rather than west and lived in Berlin, Germany, at almost the same latitude as Langley, then I would be receiving exactly the same pension treatment as if I still lived in the UK.
#11
Yep, the government's attitude to the whole latitude thing stinks.
#12
Banned










Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 15,706
From: In Limbo











#13
BE Forum Addict






Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,782











Today 10 Downing Street responded to a petition that closed on 11 June 2008 from Roy and Joan Brentnall of Canada. It asked the Prime Minister to remove the discrimination against British State pensioners who retire to the Commonwealth countries rather than Europe or the USA. It has taken over 60 days to produce a response.
It is largely a copy and paste version of what was given to a petition on January third of this year. Perhaps as a signal of the priority given to UK pensioners, even the copy and pasting created an unintelligible sentence.
Meanwhile 10 Downing Street is now Twittering, another attention-getting activity to take them away from the real priorities.
It is largely a copy and paste version of what was given to a petition on January third of this year. Perhaps as a signal of the priority given to UK pensioners, even the copy and pasting created an unintelligible sentence.
Meanwhile 10 Downing Street is now Twittering, another attention-getting activity to take them away from the real priorities.
#14
<Idly contemplates the amount that he will get in a UK state pension after 15 years NI contributions and decides it's just not worth worrying about>
#15
[QUOTE=BWelford;6676568]Meanwhile 10 Downing Street is now Twittering, another attention-getting activity to take them away from the real priorities.[QUOTE]



Man, you gotta love single-issue fanatics!
If I were PM I'd offer to give the index-linked rise to everyone, but only on the proviso that they collect their pensions in person at a UK Post Office every Tuesday morning.
Otherwise shut the f*** up and be grateful you're able to collect anything. It's more than most of us who are still years off pension age will ever get.



Man, you gotta love single-issue fanatics!
If I were PM I'd offer to give the index-linked rise to everyone, but only on the proviso that they collect their pensions in person at a UK Post Office every Tuesday morning.
Otherwise shut the f*** up and be grateful you're able to collect anything. It's more than most of us who are still years off pension age will ever get.



