![]() |
Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
Today 10 Downing Street responded to a petition that closed on 11 June 2008 from Roy and Joan Brentnall of Canada. It asked the Prime Minister to remove the discrimination against British State pensioners who retire to the Commonwealth countries rather than Europe or the USA. It has taken over 60 days to produce a response.
It is largely a copy and paste version of what was given to a petition on January third of this year. Perhaps as a signal of the priority given to UK pensioners, even the copy and pasting created an unintelligible sentence. Meanwhile 10 Downing Street is now Twittering, another attention-getting activity to take them away from the real priorities. |
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
<pulls out the popcorn, sits and waits!>
|
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
Originally Posted by Zoe Bell
(Post 6676573)
<pulls out the popcorn, sits and waits!>
|
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
Originally Posted by Steve_P
(Post 6676590)
With nothing better to do Steve pulls up a chair too.;)
One bucket of water. One bucket of sand. Light blue touch paper............. |
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
Originally Posted by Steve_P
(Post 6676590)
With nothing better to do Steve pulls up a chair too.;)
<decides to pull up a chair and much popcorn instead> |
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
May I be the first to suggest that there's no injustice here? If British pensioners living in Canada would like their pensions index linked they should move elsewhere. Furthermore, the British public is never going to be receptive to the idea of paying more to people who have voluntarily left, not to say abandoned, their country.
This argument is like marital sex, it's all a bit rote but there's still some fun in it. |
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
<petulant mode>
It's soooo unfair :mad: </petulant mode> |
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
The discrimination against UK pensioners in Commonwealth countries in freezing pensions at retirement age levels is grossly unfair. I live in Langley BC, Canada. If I had chosen to live in Bellingham, Washington, USA just 40 miles away or 1 hour by car, then I would be receiving exactly the same pension treatment as if I still lived in the UK. Equally if I had travelled east rather than west and lived in Berlin, Germany, at almost the same latitude as Langley, then I would be receiving exactly the same pension treatment as if I still lived in the UK.
|
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
To the OP.
You have 20 posts on this website and everyone of them is complaining about this perceived injustice.:thumbdown: Have you nothing else going on in your life or is this topic all encompassing?:confused: |
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
Originally Posted by BWelford
(Post 6676643)
The discrimination against UK pensioners in Commonwealth countries in freezing pensions at retirement age levels is grossly unfair. I live in Langley BC, Canada. If I had chosen to live in Bellingham, Washington, USA just 40 miles away or 1 hour by car, then I would be receiving exactly the same pension treatment as if I still lived in the UK. Equally if I had travelled east rather than west and lived in Berlin, Germany, at almost the same latitude as Langley, then I would be receiving exactly the same pension treatment as if I still lived in the UK.
|
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
Yep, the government's attitude to the whole latitude thing stinks. :thumbdown:
|
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
Originally Posted by Steve_P
(Post 6676650)
To the OP.
You have 20 posts on this website and everyone of them is complaining about this perceived injustice.:thumbdown: Have you nothing else going on in your life or is this topic all encompassing?:confused: |
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
Originally Posted by BWelford
(Post 6676568)
Today 10 Downing Street responded to a petition that closed on 11 June 2008 from Roy and Joan Brentnall of Canada. It asked the Prime Minister to remove the discrimination against British State pensioners who retire to the Commonwealth countries rather than Europe or the USA. It has taken over 60 days to produce a response.
It is largely a copy and paste version of what was given to a petition on January third of this year. Perhaps as a signal of the priority given to UK pensioners, even the copy and pasting created an unintelligible sentence. Meanwhile 10 Downing Street is now Twittering, another attention-getting activity to take them away from the real priorities. |
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
<Idly contemplates the amount that he will get in a UK state pension after 15 years NI contributions and decides it's just not worth worrying about>
|
Re: Another E-petition gets almost the same negative response
[QUOTE=BWelford;6676568]Meanwhile 10 Downing Street is now Twittering, another attention-getting activity to take them away from the real priorities.[QUOTE]
:lol::lol::lol: Man, you gotta love single-issue fanatics! If I were PM I'd offer to give the index-linked rise to everyone, but only on the proviso that they collect their pensions in person at a UK Post Office every Tuesday morning. Otherwise shut the f*** up and be grateful you're able to collect anything. It's more than most of us who are still years off pension age will ever get. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:21 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.