![]() |
Re: UK election results thread
Glegg gone. Bloodbath
|
Re: UK election results thread
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11640348)
Glegg gone. Bloodbath
|
Re: UK election results thread
Farage gone as well
|
Re: UK election results thread
Ed gone too.
|
Re: UK election results thread
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11640388)
Ed gone too.
Also who are all these Johnny come lately's voting for a Conservative majority? Hindsight's a wonderful thing! |
Re: UK election results thread
Originally Posted by renth
(Post 11640399)
Absolutely loving the schadenfreude.
Also who are all these Johnny come lately's voting for a Conservative majority? Hindsight's a wonderful thing! 14 ½ hours later, 30 million votes have been counted and 642 constituencies declared, plus a handful of recounts. Is it perhaps time we asked more of the AEC? S |
Re: UK election results thread
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11640335)
How Blair was able to run up such debt in such prosperous times is astonishing. Not to mention the banking fiasco credit crunch they left the Tories. Thank your lucky stars the Tories have been in to prevent the UK from becoming another Greece.
"With half a decade’s hindsight, it is clear the crisis had multiple causes. The most obvious is the financiers themselves—especially the irrationally exuberant Anglo-Saxon sort, who claimed to have found a way to banish risk when in fact they had simply lost track of it. Central bankers and other regulators also bear blame, for it was they who tolerated this folly. The macroeconomic backdrop was important, too. The “Great Moderationâ€â€”years of low inflation and stable growth—fostered complacency and risk-taking. A “savings glut†in Asia pushed down global interest rates. Some research also implicates European banks, which borrowed greedily in American money markets before the crisis and used the funds to buy dodgy securities. All these factors came together to foster a surge of debt in what seemed to have become a less risky world." |
Re: UK election results thread
Originally Posted by OzTennis
(Post 11640489)
The most obvious is the financiers themselves—especially the irrationally exuberant Anglo-Saxon sort, who claimed to have found a way to banish risk when in fact they had simply lost track of it.
In it's own right, that was culpable stupidity that should have seen them doing time. It's bad enough that economics is fraudulent rules of thumb passed off as 'laws'. But to take real maths and misapply is to create trillions in damage should put you behind bars till the day you die. Not paying yourself bonuses. |
Re: UK election results thread
With the poison dwarf above and Merkel below, Cameron just inherited a shit sandwich.
|
Re: UK election results thread
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11640335)
How Blair was able to run up such debt in such prosperous times is astonishing. Not to mention the banking fiasco credit crunch they left the Tories. Thank your lucky stars the Tories have been in to prevent the UK from becoming another Greece.
Compared to Cameron's Government who ran up debts of GBP 865 billion in 5 years, 6th May 2010 till 07th May 2015. Which equates to Cameron running up debt 11.5 times faster than Blair:ohmy: |
Re: UK election results thread
Galloway is gone, and it's a beautiful day.
:D |
Re: UK election results thread
Originally Posted by GarryP
(Post 11640498)
It's one of my chief bugbears. The Black-Scholes equation explicitly said 'independent events' and the prize muppets in the city wilfully ignored that.
In it's own right, that was culpable stupidity that should have seen them doing time. It's bad enough that economics is fraudulent rules of thumb passed off as 'laws'. But to take real maths and misapply is to create trillions in damage should put you behind bars till the day you die. Not paying yourself bonuses. |
Re: UK election results thread
Originally Posted by Vash the Stampede
(Post 11640622)
Galloway is gone, and it's a beautiful day.
:D The 2 biggest factors in the election result were Scottish nationalism and the way Ed Milliband was perceived by most. The other thing which all the analysts have been saying today in the UK is that the opinion polls got it stunningly wrong this time. They and the main parties did not expect the loss of Labour and gain of Conservative seats. The decimation of the Lib Dems and the rise of the SNP were both expected; the demise of UKIP was unexpected and a lot of their supposed supporters changed to blue after indicating to pollsters they'd vote for Nige. It's going to be very interesting now to see how the 56 SNP members are going to operate in Westminster. Try to be disruptive; try to act as one powerful block to help push legislation through or what? My guess is that Sturgeon will now press for another referendum even though Salmond the previous leader said not in another generation after the No vote. The SNP will take 56 out of 59 seats in Scotland as an endorsement to push hard. |
Re: UK election results thread
I think the Bugle, recorded yesterday, sums it up nicely.
https://soundcloud.com/the-bugle/bug...ining-election |
Re: UK election results thread
Originally Posted by OzTennis
(Post 11640709)
Yes, white collar people frame the laws so white collar crime is not punished to the extent that blue collar crime is. Steal from your local store and you'll do more time than if you steal millions from your clients with reckless, stupid risk taking.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:58 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.