![]() |
Re: UK election results thread
Originally Posted by OzTennis
(Post 11643706)
So you didn't say Labour in both countries created the deficits?:rofl:
You asked "You are not seriously suggesting Dave would have created a budget surplus post 2008?" I answered with "Its your story" So answering the latest question. No I didn't, but the fact remains Labour has created deficits in both countries. The Liberals and Conservatives have not. What more do you need? |
Re: UK election results thread
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11644230)
You aren't making sense.
You asked "You are not seriously suggesting Dave would have created a budget surplus post 2008?" I answered with "Its your story" So answering the latest question. No I didn't, but the fact remains Labour has created deficits in both countries. The Liberals and Conservatives have not. What more do you need? |
Re: UK election results thread
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11644230)
You aren't making sense.
You asked "You are not seriously suggesting Dave would have created a budget surplus post 2008?" I answered with "Its your story" So answering the latest question. No I didn't, but the fact remains Labour has created deficits in both countries. The Liberals and Conservatives have not. What more do you need? John Howard: IMF says Howard Most Wasteful Spender John Major (last Tory PM before Labour): https://www.facebook.com/notes/nobod...50149392738182 You think Libs and Tories don't do deficits but the reality and the proof is otherwise. What more do you need? |
Re: UK election results thread
Originally Posted by OzTennis
(Post 11644465)
Do a bit of research before you open your trap please.
John Howard: IMF says Howard Most Wasteful Spender John Major (last Tory PM before Labour): https://www.facebook.com/notes/nobod...50149392738182 You think Libs and Tories don't do deficits but the reality and the proof is otherwise. What more do you need? 1. You need to go back to the last century to find some dirt. 2. You seem to oppose the idea of fisical spending during a surplus. Gotta be better than the Rudd Harvey Norman gift voucher. 3. You took typically leftist approach of being offensive when things don't work out. Opposition should be there to oppose for good reasons. Not to oppose so they can personally attack. See Shortens budget speech this morning. Like or loath the budget it had little substance - lot of offence. |
Re: UK election results thread
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11644530)
This is becoming sad on 3 levels.
1. You need to go back to the last century to find some dirt. 2. You seem to oppose the idea of fisical spending during a surplus. Gotta be better than the Rudd Harvey Norman gift voucher. 3. You took typically leftist approach of being offensive when things don't work out. Opposition should be there to oppose for good reasons. Not to oppose so they can personally attack. See Shortens budget speech this morning. Like or loath the budget it had little substance - lot of offence. Major was the PM before Blair/Brown who governed so long that I had to go back that far - that's why I quoted his record on deficits. The UK didn't go from budget surplus to budget deficit with the change of government. Er Howard was PM before Gillard/Rudd and well into this century and see his record. Centre ground just seems 'leftist' to you. :rofl: |
Re: UK election results thread
Oh and Dave campaigned on how strong the economy was/is:
UK economic growth slows to 0.3% - BBC News |
Re: UK election results thread
Originally Posted by OzTennis
(Post 11644542)
What is sad is that you don't acknowledge the claims you made which can be easily disproved. Go back to your claims that Blair could have prevented the GFC/caused the GFC/caused the budget deficit; go back to your claims that Labour causes deficits/Libs and Tories don't.
Major was the PM before Blair/Brown who governed so long that I had to go back that far - that's why I quoted his record on deficits. The UK didn't go from budget surplus to budget deficit with the change of government. Er Howard was PM before Gillard/Rudd and well into this century and see his record. Centre ground just seems 'leftist' to you. :rofl: John Major not great but so what. Long time ago and many would argue that Maggie and he set Britain up so beautifully for Tony and his surplus in 2002. Tony then went a blew it in great prosperous times. Seriously though, would you seriously see Ed Milliband and Shorten potential leaders? No chance. |
Re: UK election results thread
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11644575)
But you are clutching at straws. You posted a facebook thread written by a group called "no one likes a Tory". How can this be taken seriously? All there articles you post are so left and so one eyed.
John Major not great but so what. Long time ago and many would argue that Maggie and he set Britain up so beautifully for Tony and his surplus in 2002. Tony then went a blew it in great prosperous times. Seriously though, would you seriously see Ed Milliband and Shorten potential leaders? No chance. |
Re: UK election results thread
Originally Posted by OzTennis
(Post 11644552)
Oh and Dave campaigned on how strong the economy was/is:
UK economic growth slows to 0.3% - BBC News Link after link. Hey check out this article. http://m.smh.com.au/business/federal-budget/bill-shorten-evades-questions-from-neil-mitchell-on-labor-deficit-13-times-20150513-gh0mwa.html |
Re: UK election results thread
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11644622)
That article was written before the election. Clearly the voters gave a shit. :)
Link after link. Hey check out this article. Bill Shorten evades questions from Neil Mitchell on Labor deficit 13 times | smh.com.au Heaven help us if he ever gets to be our leader |
Re: UK election results thread
Originally Posted by Beoz
(Post 11644575)
But you are clutching at straws. You posted a facebook thread written by a group called "no one likes a Tory". How can this be taken seriously? All there articles you post are so left and so one eyed.
John Major not great but so what. Long time ago and many would argue that Maggie and he set Britain up so beautifully for Tony and his surplus in 2002. Tony then went a blew it in great prosperous times. Seriously though, would you seriously see Ed Milliband and Shorten potential leaders? No chance. • Average annual spending and taxation were both lower as a proportion of GDP under the last 3 Labour Governments (38% and 35.4%) than under the 4 Conservative governments which preceded them (40% and 35.5%). • National debt was lower as a proportion of GDP at the start of the financial crisis in 2008 (36%) than in 1997, the last year of John Major’s Conservative government (42%). • In 2010, the UK’s national debt as a proportion of GDP (52%) was the second lowest of the G7 countries. And don't just refute them because of where they come from; do some research and prove otherwise; until then you possibly could be wrong. |
Re: UK election results thread
Originally Posted by Amazulu
(Post 11644696)
TA is not that great a PM but is streets ahead of that commie asshat
Heaven help us if he ever gets to be our leader |
Re: UK election results thread
Current UK National Debt Numbers
Gross National Debt FY 2015* £1.36 trillion FY 2014 £1.26 trillion FY 2013 £1.19 trillion FY 2012 £1.10 trillion FY 2011 £0.91 trillion FY 2010 £0.76 trillion FY 2009 £0.62 trillion FY 2008 £0.53 trillion http://i1355.photobucket.com/albums/...pswk1ax338.png http://i1355.photobucket.com/albums/...psnu0u5jri.png |
Re: UK election results thread
Originally Posted by OzTennis
(Post 11644701)
Which part of these bits of evidence do you refute (I know you don't want to believe them and you think Tories do this and that but that's irrelevant)?
• Average annual spending and taxation were both lower as a proportion of GDP under the last 3 Labour Governments (38% and 35.4%) than under the 4 Conservative governments which preceded them (40% and 35.5%). • National debt was lower as a proportion of GDP at the start of the financial crisis in 2008 (36%) than in 1997, the last year of John Major’s Conservative government (42%). • In 2010, the UK’s national debt as a proportion of GDP (52%) was the second lowest of the G7 countries. And don't just refute them because of where they come from; do some research and prove otherwise; until then you possibly could be wrong. Tony Blair can't escape blame for trashing the economy - Spectator Blogs I do like your last stat though. The G7 countries. You do know which they include right and you do know where the world was in 2010 right? The fact remains, Tony Blair increased debt under his reign in prosperous times and it was under his watch banks took excessive risks which forced the government to bail out banks, something you in the UK are all paying for today and will for some time to come. |
Re: UK election results thread
Originally Posted by OzTennis
(Post 11644728)
Current UK National Debt Numbers
Gross National Debt FY 2015* £1.36 trillion FY 2014 £1.26 trillion FY 2013 £1.19 trillion FY 2012 £1.10 trillion FY 2011 £0.91 trillion FY 2010 £0.76 trillion FY 2009 £0.62 trillion FY 2008 £0.53 trillion http://i1355.photobucket.com/albums/...pswk1ax338.png http://i1355.photobucket.com/albums/...psnu0u5jri.png Then the government were forced to pile money into the banking system, the debt naturally rose. What we see now is the debt tapering off and if the curve followings on that trajectory should be heading downward in the next year or 2. Well done to David and team. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 5:47 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.