British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   The Barbie (https://britishexpats.com/forum/barbie-92/)
-   -   Olympics 2016 (https://britishexpats.com/forum/barbie-92/olympics-2016-a-881551/)

GarryP Aug 23rd 2016 12:55 am

Re: Olympics 2016
 

Originally Posted by OzTennis (Post 12033045)
:confused:Lighten up and don't take everything so seriously, twas tongue in cheek. Yes, in teams of 2 or 4 not 13's. Andy Murray isn't lottery funded.

Err, you thought I was serious? :ohmy:

OzTennis Aug 23rd 2016 1:24 am

Re: Olympics 2016
 

Originally Posted by GarryP (Post 12033074)
Err, you thought I was serious? :ohmy:

Yes, by pointing out the team golds, the benefit of union lottery funding etc. ;)

Beoz Aug 23rd 2016 9:02 am

Re: Olympics 2016
 

Originally Posted by GarryP (Post 12033022)
But as we've covered, a major part of the reason the UK did as well as it did was because of the use of lottery funding to support athletes. So obviously those scottish athletes were disproportionately supported by English funds, and without that support they wouldn't have done as well.

And looking at the list, quite a few of those 'scottish' medals were in teams - so they obviously needed their non-scottish team mates. eg of the 4 gold, 3 are in teams or pairs.

See money can buy happiness. For once we have a sports thread where the English (forget the Brits) contribute.

Dreamy Aug 23rd 2016 10:50 am

Re: Olympics 2016
 

Originally Posted by OzTennis (Post 12033016)
Scotland 18 medals - 4 gold, 8 silver and 6 bronze; on the basis of share of GB population the rest of the union didn't perform as well so wishing to disassociate with the rest of the Union perhaps? (1/13 population, 18/67 of medals)

According to the Manchester Evening News, if athletes born or based in Greater Manchester were a country, they would have finished 4th in the table (third if those medals were removed from GB's haul)

If Manchester was a country

spouse of scouse Aug 23rd 2016 11:41 am

Re: Olympics 2016
 

Originally Posted by Dreamy (Post 12033545)
According to the Manchester Evening News, if athletes born or based in Greater Manchester were a country, they would have finished 4th in the table (third if those medals were removed from GB's haul)

Dreamy! That's bloody Irish, that is :lol:

spouse of scouse Aug 23rd 2016 11:47 am

Re: Olympics 2016
 
Fear not, I've worked it out.

If Australia wasn't a country, and its athletes were cats instead of people, then - shite, I forgot what the ending was

commonwealth Aug 23rd 2016 1:48 pm

Re: Olympics 2016
 
Would have it been better if the National Lottery was used to put more funds into the NHS instead?

Will the Olympics inspire people to adopt healthy habits and reduce the health budget?

jad n rich Aug 23rd 2016 2:42 pm

Re: Olympics 2016
 

Originally Posted by spouse of scouse (Post 12033578)
Fear not, I've worked it out.

If Australia wasn't a country, and its athletes were cats instead of people, then - shite, I forgot what the ending was

:rofl:

Beoz Aug 23rd 2016 2:58 pm

Re: Olympics 2016
 

Originally Posted by commonwealth (Post 12033613)
Would have it been better if the National Lottery was used to put more funds into the NHS instead?

Will the Olympics inspire people to adopt healthy habits and reduce the health budget?

That's Australia attitude. Britian are so '96.

jad n rich Aug 23rd 2016 3:54 pm

Re: Olympics 2016
 

Originally Posted by commonwealth (Post 12033613)

Will the Olympics inspire people to adopt healthy habits and reduce the health budget?


Nope, probably just to buy a bigger TV, order Foxtel, and chow down on triple cheese deep crust pizza and beer.

TGA Aug 23rd 2016 4:57 pm

Re: Olympics 2016
 
Team GB arrive home.
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/imageserve...,78&resize=600

and the aussie ?champions?
http://www.abc.net.au/news/image/778...x2-700x467.jpg

Turnbull salutes Olympic champions
?

jad n rich Aug 23rd 2016 6:17 pm

Re: Olympics 2016
 

Originally Posted by TGA (Post 12033671)


Elegant, as neat as a a synchronized swimming routine. :lol:

However to be fair it would be hard to emulate that while wearing head to toe Kermit green polyester.

Every time I see the uniform, all 14,000 pieces apparently :eek: I just want to tweak that colour scheme a little, well OK a lot, so many beautiful shades of green, crisp white, a gold button.

Beoz Aug 23rd 2016 7:27 pm

Re: Olympics 2016
 

Originally Posted by TGA (Post 12033671)

Yep. As I said, Britain is so '96.

What's with the wearable curtains?

TGA Aug 24th 2016 4:43 pm

Re: Olympics 2016
 

Originally Posted by Beoz (Post 12033760)
Yep. As I said, Britain is so '96.

What's with the wearable curtains?

them there are winners curtains :thumbsup:
the aussies might be wearing them in 10 years time:rofl: lke most things, it takes the aussies 10 years to catch up.;)

Beoz Aug 24th 2016 6:16 pm

Re: Olympics 2016
 

Originally Posted by TGA (Post 12034499)
them there are winners curtains :thumbsup:
the aussies might be wearing them in 10 years time:rofl: lke most things, it takes the aussies 10 years to catch up.;)

Been there and done it my friend. You're catching up.

Maybe in 10 years you might be contenders for the Euro's or something important ...... nah that's never gonna happen :)


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 2:19 am.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.