![]() |
Olympics 2016
I'm surprised there is no thread for this yet.
USA just went ahead in the gold medal count. From my perspective Australia lost second place in the men's swimming relay because of Magnussen. It was a good race though. Djokovic just got kicked out in tennis. I'm trying to find a good app/website that can provide a schedule based on country but cannot. |
Re: Olympics 2016
Been watching on 7 and on BBC iplayer (live stream is surprising good considering its the technologically challenged BBC)
Excellent coverage on both counts - each biased towards their own nation naturally Really enjoyed the shooting, archery and table tennis Australia doing better than last time that's for sure |
Re: Olympics 2016
I know its how they count it, but its a bit ridiculous and obvious if you send 300 or 400 athletes you are going to win more than the majority of countries who send a handful or even 100 athletes. Should divide tally by amount of participants. Or by who spent half a billion on training v a third world athletes budget.
|
Re: Olympics 2016
Originally Posted by jad n rich
(Post 12021986)
I know its how they count it, but its a bit ridiculous and obvious if you send 300 or 400 athletes you are going to win more than the majority of countries who send a handful or even 100 athletes. Should divide tally by amount of participants. Or by who spent half a billion on training v a third world athletes budget.
|
Re: Olympics 2016
Originally Posted by knockoff nige
(Post 12021994)
I don't agree. The best athletes probably have the best training equipment or trainers but they are still the best athletes. It's not called the most natural athlete Olympics. Plus, adding more athletes doesn't mean more medals as they dont gain an advantage in any sport by having more representatives in any particular event. If they are good enough, they win medals.
|
Re: Olympics 2016
Originally Posted by knockoff nige
(Post 12021964)
I'm trying to find a good app/website that can provide a schedule based on country but cannot. |
Re: Olympics 2016
Originally Posted by knockoff nige
(Post 12021994)
I don't agree. The best athletes probably have the best training equipment or trainers but they are still the best athletes. It's not called the most natural athlete Olympics. Plus, adding more athletes doesn't mean more medals as they dont gain an advantage in any sport by having more representatives in any particular event. If they are good enough, they win medals.
No country with 6 entrants is ever going to be top of da league. USA China, used to be Russia, Australia and anyone else who sent in a army sized contingent. My partners niece is actually in the Olympics, after one year of training , amazing perks, free luxury accom year round, airfares, training, Uni, sponsorships, equipment, medical, dental, overseas camps, all paid for, does not even have to buy groceries, and a free car. It totally blew my perception of how poor these kids do it to get there, they train hard but never have to put hand in pocket. Makes a fabulous living, but they still fundraise to get her there :blink: |
Re: Olympics 2016
Originally Posted by jad n rich
(Post 12022028)
Countries with the largest numbers of athletes or biggest budgets do win every time. Will happen again this year too. BBC has predicted the result by economists who worked it out on those factors.
No country with 6 entrants is ever going to be top of da league. USA China, used to be Russia, Australia and anyone else who sent in a army sized contingent. My partners niece is actually in the Olympics, after one year of training , amazing perks, free luxury accom year round, airfares, training, Uni, sponsorships, equipment, medical, dental, overseas camps, all paid for, does not even have to buy groceries, and a free car. It totally blew my perception of how poor these kids do it to get there, they train hard but never have to put hand in pocket. Makes a fabulous living, but they still fundraise to get her there :blink: |
Re: Olympics 2016
Originally Posted by knockoff nige
(Post 12021964)
I'm trying to find a good app/website that can provide a schedule based on country but cannot.
|
Re: Olympics 2016
Originally Posted by GarryP
(Post 12022044)
Google Now provides that, doesn't it?
|
Re: Olympics 2016
Originally Posted by Amazulu
(Post 12021995)
Yes, look at countries like Kenya and Ethiopia who do so well in distance running and Cuba in boxing
Sadly, have a look at the length of this list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...s_in_athletics |
Re: Olympics 2016
Originally Posted by knockoff nige
(Post 12022073)
good app/website I said :p
Hell, even apple fanbois are saying they wish they had it over siri now. |
Re: Olympics 2016
Originally Posted by GarryP
(Post 12022084)
And Google Now, I said :p
Hell, even apple fanbois are saying they wish they had it over siri now. |
Re: Olympics 2016
Originally Posted by GarryP
(Post 12022084)
And Google Now, I said :p
Hell, even apple fanbois are saying they wish they had it over siri now. |
Re: Olympics 2016
Originally Posted by knockoff nige
(Post 12022095)
Can we not go down this road please?
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 3:44 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.