![]() |
Re: Global warming
I must admit, the AGW mantra is used and twisted to account for almost everything . I’m surprised the JFK assassination wasn’t attributed to some effect of Global Warming.
However, the reason for posting the link was because the public, who are rapidly losing any confidence in IPCC and the AGW lobby, are going to look in askance when they are told about AGW and yet see 50 ships trapping in unseasonal ice. |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by NedKelly
(Post 8398550)
Is one of the effects harder winters in the USA & Texas? If it is it looks like Al Gore was right. Maybe Lord_Faraguhar can enlighten us. I am sure he will be here soon.
One - or even a series - of colder, or warmer, seasons tells us nothing about climate change per se. Climate is on a much longer timescale. But when "deniers" point fingers at effects that are consistent with warming *climatologically* we should be aware of the pros and cons of the arguments, not just assume their assessments are correct. |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by Wol
(Post 8398536)
Oh yes, the lawyers. Much better than the scientists.
|
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by Cape Blue
(Post 8398540)
Apart from being wrong when you quote Wol's comment, why is it that it has to be Gore's lies rather than errors or interpretations?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimmock...ion_and_Skills The part about stopping was a direct reference to the fim "An Inconvernient Truth" where it talks about the "slowing" or "stopping" of the gulfstream. As far as Gore's lies, well he is an ex-politiician and he has already made millions from global warming, and he also stands to make billions from carbon trading... Gore made the statements in his film and the courts proved the statements to be false. Consequently they are Gore's lies. He has a vested interested. Wikipedia. Oh yes, what a good and unbiased reference source... :rolleyes: |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by Cape Blue
(Post 8398450)
But let's not let those sort of facts get in the way of a good rant to the contrary.
|
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by slapphead_otool
(Post 8398599)
I must admit, the AGW mantra is used and twisted to account for almost everything . I’m surprised the JFK assassination wasn’t attributed to some effect of Global Warming.
However, the reason for posting the link was because the public, who are rapidly losing any confidence in IPCC and the AGW lobby, are going to look in askance when they are told about AGW and yet see 50 ships trapping in unseasonal ice. |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by Deancm
(Post 8400205)
Where was I wrong when I quoted Wol's comment? BE did it for me so the quote was exactly what Wol wrote.
The part about stopping was a direct reference to the fim "An Inconvernient Truth" where it talks about the "slowing" or "stopping" of the gulfstream. As far as Gore's lies, well he is an ex-politiician and he has already made millions from global warming, and he also stands to make billions from carbon trading... Gore made the statements in his film and the courts proved the statements to be false. Consequently they are Gore's lies. He has a vested interested. Wikipedia. Oh yes, what a good and unbiased reference source... :rolleyes: |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by iolande
(Post 8400749)
Hasn't the gulfstream stopped before? :confused:
|
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by Lord_Farquar
(Post 8402274)
Yes approx 8,000 years ago.
|
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by iolande
(Post 8402657)
and what happened in Nov 2004?
|
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by Lord_Farquar
(Post 8402679)
Stopped for a few days apparently.
That's one of the lies in Al Gore's film "An Inconvenient Truth" that the British High Court dispelled. The evidence proved to the court that slowing/stopping the gulfstream was a scientific impossibilty. I guess the British High Courts decision was the real inconvenient truth... |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by iolande
(Post 8402717)
Couldn't the British High Court stop it?
Maybe the Court should have got advice from scientists rather than landed gentry lobbyists? |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by Lord_Farquar
(Post 8402799)
You have to wonder where the British High Court got its evidence ;)
Maybe the Court should have got advice from scientists rather than landed gentry lobbyists? |
Re: Global warming
Is global cooling around the corner?
The UK and continental Europe could be gripped by more frequent cold winters in the future as a result of low solar activity, say researchers |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by polyama
(Post 8600477)
Solar activity is the primary source of the heat energy in the climate system. Any changes in it will definitely affect the climate, as we know from historical data. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 11:45 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.