![]() |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by slapphead_otool
(Post 8352527)
The search for truth overrules all other factors and influences.
|
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by iolande
(Post 8352531)
no i can't - not in this instance where you have cherry-picked information out of a report. But this is a side issue which is being paraded as a core issue, so I will not give it the amount of credence that vested interests would like to see me give it.
ITS NOT A SIDE ISSUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The head of the CRU says the planet has been cooling for the last 7 years!!!!!!!! The head of the CRU says there has been no global warming for the last 14 years!!!!!!! The head of the CRU says exactly the same global warming seen from 1975 onwards has happened three times in the last one hundred and forty years!!!!!! THESE ARE NOT SIDE ISSUES!!!! This is the entire crux of the AGW debate. This is what this thread is about. This is make or break time…….. |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by slapphead_otool
(Post 8352540)
DEAR GOD IOLANDE!!!!!!!!
ITS NOT A SIDE ISSUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The head of the CRU says the planet has been cooling for the last 7 years!!!!!!!! The head of the CRU says there has been no global warming for the last 14 years!!!!!!! The head of the CRU says exactly the same global warming seen from 1975 onwards has happened three times in the last one hundred and forty years!!!!!! THESE ARE NOT SIDE ISSUES!!!! This is the entire crux of the AGW debate. This is what this thread is about. This is make or break time…….. |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by iolande
(Post 8352570)
yes, we have already discussed how temporary cyclical cooling has created a short-term offset to the long term trend of global warming on this thread. This is not make-or-break. He isn't saying anything the pro-AGW lobby haven't been saying in the last 20-odd years.
1975 - 1998: some global warming, but identical warming to that seen between 1860 – 1880, and 1910 - 1940. 1995 – 2009: No global warming. 2002 - 2009 Planet is cooling. That’s it ladies and gentlemen. That is from the mouth of the UKs primary AGW forecasting institute, and lead provider of data to the IPCC. Someone please explain…… |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by iolande
(Post 8352534)
whose truth are you searching for?
|
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by iolande
(Post 8352570)
yes, we have already discussed how temporary cyclical cooling has created a short-term offset to the long term trend of global warming on this thread. This is not make-or-break. He isn't saying anything the pro-AGW lobby haven't been saying in the last 20-odd years.
Are we talking 1000 years? |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by Lord_Farquar
(Post 8352578)
Maybe he is Fox Mulder and Burbage is scully.
there might be some resemblance :D I never saw the show. i was too busy in night school.... |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by slapphead_otool
(Post 8352581)
Please define "short term" and long term" in the context of AGW, so i can put it into perspective.
Are we talking 1000 years? |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by Lord_Farquar
(Post 8352578)
Maybe he is Fox Mulder and Burbage is scully.
|
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by iolande
(Post 8352605)
I refer you to the previous posts where we discussed the short-term issues (they include solar stuff, ocean temperatures and cycles etc)
It isn’t a get out of jail card to be used when the hypothesis falls on its bum. How long is a short term cycle? |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by slapphead_otool
(Post 8352576)
Let me translate what the head of the CRU actually said into meaningful text:
1975 - 1998: some global warming, but identical warming to that seen between 1860 – 1880, and 1910 - 1940. 1995 – 2009: No global warming. 2002 - 2009 Planet is cooling. That’s it ladies and gentlemen. That is from the mouth of the UKs primary AGW forecasting institute, and lead provider of data to the IPCC. Someone please explain…… |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by slapphead_otool
(Post 8352611)
. But Iolande, if the AGW are going to use the "short term cycles" argument, they must provide a definition of what a short term cycle is.
It isn’t a get out of jail card to be used when the hypothesis falls on its bum. How long is a short term cycle? |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by iolande
(Post 8352625)
I refer you to the previous posts where the cycles were discussed. The length of time is included.
Many relate to solar cycles, and as such are not related to this subject (although Solar Cycles may well be related to GW) Some posts refer to oceanic cooling cycles. No prediction or estimate of the length of a cycle Oceanic or global is made anywhere on this thread. Like a say, you cant use “get out of jail cardsâ€. Planet Earth isn’t a juvenile delinquent. We cant say – “its just a phase its going throughâ€.:) If you intend using cycles as a reason for Climate Stagnation (which is what we currently have) they you need to provide some timelines so that serious analysis can be conducted. |
Re: Global warming
Originally Posted by iolande
(Post 8352620)
I refer you to the sticky on quoting (and misquoting)
if you wish to translate his words and get different meanings please do so.... I am agog to see what you can come up with. bet you cant put a postive AGW spin on his words.:) |
Re: Global warming
Let me try:
BBC: So Jonesey, looks like you stuffed up a bit. Prof Jones: Well yes, we did fudge some data, and threw away any evidence that might prove us wrong. But you know, we are Scientists, we do what we like. BBC: Yes, but now with the investigation…. Prof Jones: Ahhh don’t you go worrying about that. My mates will cover my bum. We have stacked the inquiry, and I have said sorry about losing that notepad from 1963. That will fix everything. BBC: So is the planet warming? Prof Jones: Yes of course it is. BBC: Really? Prof Jones: Well XXXX Knows. Its been bloody cooling since we started, and it hasn’t really warmed for a long time. But it did for a while back in the seventies. That was when we were using mercury thermometers you know. But it definitely warmed a bit back then. BBC: And that warming in the seventies was unique? Prof Jones: Good lord no. Its happened lots of times before. We try not to talk about it, because it makes us look stupid. BBC: So it’s a cycle? Prof Jones: Yes, exactly. And I am going to hop on it and ride off into the sunset. Im looking for a new career as a bike courier you know. BBC: Thanks. :) |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 7:37 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.