Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > Australia > The Barbie
Reload this Page >

The first mistake in the bible!

Wikiposts

The first mistake in the bible!

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 26th 2007 | 11:03 am
  #421  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,158
iPom is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by magicsprout
going back to getting rid of the god squad i keep the witches bible next to the front door, they tend to back off when you whip out your bible. we only ever get hit when theyve changed people now. he he he
I just keep three children. Answer the door with them hanging off you, looking frazzled and snap...

'Yes?'
When they tell you what they want to talk to you about, 'Sure, if one of you can babysit my children, you can come in'
 
Old Jun 26th 2007 | 11:07 am
  #422  
themerlin's Avatar
Where traffic lights rule
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,463
From: Brighton QLD
themerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Have a look at this Drake Equation Calculator

Originally Posted by iPom
By 'life' aren't we talking microbial stuff, rather than little green men?
And didn't they find something like that already in a chunk of rock from Mars?
Ok, there's arguments for and against, but it's the best bit of proof I've seen. In the meantime, in 36 years, I have seen no proof of god.
 
Old Jun 26th 2007 | 11:13 am
  #423  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 48
From: Brisbane, for now
Uncle Fester has a spectacular aura aboutUncle Fester has a spectacular aura aboutUncle Fester has a spectacular aura about
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by northerner
There is no life on other planets - what was that you keep saying about fairy tales, or are we now talking comic books?

Graham
Now THERE'S a bold statement if ever I've read one!!
 
Old Jun 26th 2007 | 11:14 am
  #424  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 48
From: Brisbane, for now
Uncle Fester has a spectacular aura aboutUncle Fester has a spectacular aura aboutUncle Fester has a spectacular aura about
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by northerner
Not at all, you can believe what you like moneypen. But now you seem to be going from 'I don't believe in God - it's all a fairy tale' to 'Oh, but I reckon aliens might exist' which seems a little odd to me.

Graham
Wouldn't we be the Aliens to them as well though? Not that I'd care as long as Sigourney Weaver came along as well
 
Old Jun 26th 2007 | 11:15 am
  #425  
asher's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 20,690
From: in the Sydney asylum
asher has a reputation beyond reputeasher has a reputation beyond reputeasher has a reputation beyond reputeasher has a reputation beyond reputeasher has a reputation beyond reputeasher has a reputation beyond reputeasher has a reputation beyond reputeasher has a reputation beyond reputeasher has a reputation beyond reputeasher has a reputation beyond reputeasher has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by iPom
I just keep three children. Answer the door with them hanging off you, looking frazzled and snap...

'Yes?'
When they tell you what they want to talk to you about, 'Sure, if one of you can babysit my children, you can come in'
I use sign language they leave pretty quickly and give me a wide birth the next time they come
 
Old Jun 26th 2007 | 11:29 am
  #426  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,158
iPom is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by themerlin
Have a look at this Drake Equation Calculator
I love SETI ... I have their screen saver to find signals ...
 
Old Jun 26th 2007 | 11:30 am
  #427  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,158
iPom is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by asher
I use sign language they leave pretty quickly and give me a wide birth the next time they come

Nice.
 
Old Jun 26th 2007 | 12:52 pm
  #428  
arkon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Ex BE ***** Addict
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,773
arkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by Shakmaty
Read this....it's as good an explanation as any

http://www.adequacy.org/stories/2001...12022.112.html
What an article! I was ok right up to "God will's his son into the womb of a virgin" To essentially explain why he doesn't need a spaceship or to actually travel anywhere.
 
Old Jun 26th 2007 | 12:56 pm
  #429  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,158
iPom is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by arkon
What an article! I was ok right up to "God will's his son into the womb of a virgin" To essentially explain why he doesn't need a spaceship or to actually travel anywhere.
I think that's the point I lost my faith too, Arkon.
 
Old Jun 26th 2007 | 12:57 pm
  #430  
Swerv-o's Avatar
has lost The Game
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,735
From: Chippendale, Sydney
Swerv-o has a reputation beyond reputeSwerv-o has a reputation beyond reputeSwerv-o has a reputation beyond reputeSwerv-o has a reputation beyond reputeSwerv-o has a reputation beyond reputeSwerv-o has a reputation beyond reputeSwerv-o has a reputation beyond reputeSwerv-o has a reputation beyond reputeSwerv-o has a reputation beyond reputeSwerv-o has a reputation beyond reputeSwerv-o has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by themerlin
Have a look at this Drake Equation Calculator
Hmm. That's quite interesting. Using the figures it supplies, it gives a figure of 1000 civilisations able to communicate. Hmm. Not much of a Galactic Empire that.

Clarke suggested that the fact that we havn't encountered any Von Neumann machines yet may mean that we are the furthest advanced civilisation around.

Von Neumann machines are capable of replicating themselves from natural and surrounding resources, with no further input from anybody else. The idea is that you send one off to a far flung planet, then when it lands, it clones itself many times, and then deploys probes off to other planets. The number of machines should theoretically grow exponentially, however there are many failure mechanisms to account for. Clarke suggested that this sort of automation would demark a high technology civilisation from a low one, and would represent a certain point in achievement.

There's a better description here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clanking_replicator

and here:

http://www.rattlesnake.com/notions/V..._machines.html

The suggestion is that, given the distances involved, VN machines would be the most effective method or exploring space, and the fact that we havn't encountered any yet suggests that there are no galactic civilisations capable of developing them. He touched on this in 2001 and 2010, as that's effectively what The Monolith was, among other things.

Of course it doesn't mean to say that there arn't primitive civilisations that havn't developed any kind of communications capability yet.

And of course on the other hand, Clarke, though he may have conceived the geostationary communications satellite, also suggested that by 2000 we would have learnt how to train monkeys to do menial housework for us... How I wish I had a monkey now...

S
 
Old Jun 26th 2007 | 1:00 pm
  #431  
themerlin's Avatar
Where traffic lights rule
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,463
From: Brighton QLD
themerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

I love the line "Albert Einstein was certainly a smart man, but in a fistfight with the Almighty, he loses."

Originally Posted by arkon
What an article! I was ok right up to "God will's his son into the womb of a virgin" To essentially explain why he doesn't need a spaceship or to actually travel anywhere.
 
Old Jun 26th 2007 | 1:06 pm
  #432  
Shakmaty's Avatar
Take it easy
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,182
From: Melbourne
Shakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by themerlin
I love the line "Albert Einstein was certainly a smart man, but in a fistfight with the Almighty, he loses."

Albert Einstein -

"A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death."
 
Old Jun 26th 2007 | 1:06 pm
  #433  
themerlin's Avatar
Where traffic lights rule
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,463
From: Brighton QLD
themerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond reputethemerlin has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Or maybe we are the Von Neumann machines

Originally Posted by Swerv-o
Clarke suggested that the fact that we havn't encountered any Von Neumann machines yet may mean that we are the furthest advanced civilisation around.
 
Old Jun 26th 2007 | 1:09 pm
  #434  
arkon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Ex BE ***** Addict
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,773
arkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond reputearkon has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by themerlin
Have a look at this Drake Equation Calculator
Cool Calculator. I've had a play with it and even using really pessimistic numbers I got 330 communicating civilizations, which I initially thought was a lot, but when you consider that's 330 out of 100 billion suns, we don't really have much of a chance of finding one by chance.

I personally think it's the absolute height of mans arrogance that we can even believe we are the only intellignet life out there. The most arrogant section of mankind is usually those of a religious persuasion. Isn't the real reason most if not all religious types deny the possibility of extra terrestrial life is the fundamental undermining of their faith if we should ever find some.

I am much more likely to believe in ET rather than a god, as religion has had a few thousand years to come up with some concrete proof and failed. Whereas SETI and Nasa has only been at it a very short time and already found hundreds of extra solar planets. Why is it religious people think they are so special, more special than us non-believer, and so special life can only exist here?
 
Old Jun 26th 2007 | 1:14 pm
  #435  
Shakmaty's Avatar
Take it easy
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,182
From: Melbourne
Shakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond reputeShakmaty has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The first mistake in the bible!

Originally Posted by arkon
I personally think it's the absolute height of mans arrogance that we can even believe we are the only intellignet life out there. The most arrogant section of mankind is usually those of a religious persuasion. Isn't the real reason most if not all religious types deny the possibility of extra terrestrial life is the fundamental undermining of their faith if we should ever find some.
Albert Einstein -

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.