The first mistake in the bible!
#421
Account Closed










Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,158

'Yes?'
When they tell you what they want to talk to you about, 'Sure, if one of you can babysit my children, you can come in'
#422
Have a look at this Drake Equation Calculator
By 'life' aren't we talking microbial stuff, rather than little green men?
And didn't they find something like that already in a chunk of rock from Mars?
Ok, there's arguments for and against, but it's the best bit of proof I've seen. In the meantime, in 36 years, I have seen no proof of god.
And didn't they find something like that already in a chunk of rock from Mars?
Ok, there's arguments for and against, but it's the best bit of proof I've seen. In the meantime, in 36 years, I have seen no proof of god.
#424
Banned

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 48
From: Brisbane, for now



#425
#426
Account Closed










Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,158

Have a look at this Drake Equation Calculator
#428
Read this....it's as good an explanation as any
http://www.adequacy.org/stories/2001...12022.112.html

http://www.adequacy.org/stories/2001...12022.112.html
#430
Have a look at this Drake Equation Calculator
Clarke suggested that the fact that we havn't encountered any Von Neumann machines yet may mean that we are the furthest advanced civilisation around.
Von Neumann machines are capable of replicating themselves from natural and surrounding resources, with no further input from anybody else. The idea is that you send one off to a far flung planet, then when it lands, it clones itself many times, and then deploys probes off to other planets. The number of machines should theoretically grow exponentially, however there are many failure mechanisms to account for. Clarke suggested that this sort of automation would demark a high technology civilisation from a low one, and would represent a certain point in achievement.
There's a better description here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clanking_replicator
and here:
http://www.rattlesnake.com/notions/V..._machines.html
The suggestion is that, given the distances involved, VN machines would be the most effective method or exploring space, and the fact that we havn't encountered any yet suggests that there are no galactic civilisations capable of developing them. He touched on this in 2001 and 2010, as that's effectively what The Monolith was, among other things.
Of course it doesn't mean to say that there arn't primitive civilisations that havn't developed any kind of communications capability yet.
And of course on the other hand, Clarke, though he may have conceived the geostationary communications satellite, also suggested that by 2000 we would have learnt how to train monkeys to do menial housework for us... How I wish I had a monkey now...
S
#431
I love the line "Albert Einstein was certainly a smart man, but in a fistfight with the Almighty, he loses." 

#432
Albert Einstein -
"A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death."
#434
Have a look at this Drake Equation Calculator
I personally think it's the absolute height of mans arrogance that we can even believe we are the only intellignet life out there. The most arrogant section of mankind is usually those of a religious persuasion. Isn't the real reason most if not all religious types deny the possibility of extra terrestrial life is the fundamental undermining of their faith if we should ever find some.
I am much more likely to believe in ET rather than a god, as religion has had a few thousand years to come up with some concrete proof and failed. Whereas SETI and Nasa has only been at it a very short time and already found hundreds of extra solar planets. Why is it religious people think they are so special, more special than us non-believer, and so special life can only exist here?
#435
I personally think it's the absolute height of mans arrogance that we can even believe we are the only intellignet life out there. The most arrogant section of mankind is usually those of a religious persuasion. Isn't the real reason most if not all religious types deny the possibility of extra terrestrial life is the fundamental undermining of their faith if we should ever find some.
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."






