Diana - an accident, not a conspiracy
#61
Fighting my corner
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 11,948
Re: Diana - an accident, not a conspiracy
Originally Posted by BadgeIsBack
"With just 12 payments of $432.12 this can be yours to own."
Vash, do they still do those in the Sunday press?
Vash, do they still do those in the Sunday press?
But knowing the UK, and having seen what passes for interior decor in this country, I'd say that the answer would be "Yes".
#62
BE Forum Addict
Joined: May 2005
Location: Mornington
Posts: 1,650
Re: Diana - an accident, not a conspiracy
But knowing the UK, and having seen what passes for interior decor in this country, I'd say that the answer would be "Yes". [/QUOTE]
Please, is this coming from someone from the Continent that style forgot.
I have never seen such poor interior design in my life until we started looking at houses for sale over here
John
Please, is this coming from someone from the Continent that style forgot.
I have never seen such poor interior design in my life until we started looking at houses for sale over here
John
#63
Re: Diana - an accident, not a conspiracy
Originally Posted by cresta57
Damn! I thought it was an accident 10 yrs ago; Henri Paul merely swerved to avoid Lord Lucan who was riding Shergar.
#64
Re: Diana - an accident, not a conspiracy
The sad Daily Express has been peddling regular front page stories (I don't read it you understand, just see the front when buying my 'quality' paper) since 1997 about the 'conspiracy'. Even after Lord Taylor's report it said, next day that 86% of DE readers still believe it was a conspiracy.
The Times said the best person to come out of the trilogy in the report was Henri Paul, the driver. He was the semi-drunken Fayed employee who crashed the car at 100 mph, trying to escape the pappasomething at Dodi and Di's behest. He was told he wasn't required for the rest of the night and after having a few drinks with his mates Dodi rang him up and said you are driving us somewhere. Di didn't wear a seatbelt too so as to not spoil her lovely outfit (sorry, damage her supposedly unborn child).
So basically it was MI5, Prince Phillip and the CIA working together to get rid of the pregnant Diana.
OzTennis
The Times said the best person to come out of the trilogy in the report was Henri Paul, the driver. He was the semi-drunken Fayed employee who crashed the car at 100 mph, trying to escape the pappasomething at Dodi and Di's behest. He was told he wasn't required for the rest of the night and after having a few drinks with his mates Dodi rang him up and said you are driving us somewhere. Di didn't wear a seatbelt too so as to not spoil her lovely outfit (sorry, damage her supposedly unborn child).
So basically it was MI5, Prince Phillip and the CIA working together to get rid of the pregnant Diana.
OzTennis
#65
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 312
Re: Diana - an accident, not a conspiracy
Originally Posted by OzTennis
The sad Daily Express has been peddling regular front page stories (I don't read it you understand, just see the front when buying my 'quality' paper) since 1997 about the 'conspiracy'. Even after Lord Taylor's report it said, next day that 86% of DE readers still believe it was a conspiracy.
The Times said the best person to come out of the trilogy in the report was Henri Paul, the driver. He was the semi-drunken Fayed employee who crashed the car at 100 mph, trying to escape the pappasomething at Dodi and Di's behest. He was told he wasn't required for the rest of the night and after having a few drinks with his mates Dodi rang him up and said you are driving us somewhere. Di didn't wear a seatbelt too so as to not spoil her lovely outfit (sorry, damage her supposedly unborn child).
So basically it was MI5, Prince Phillip and the CIA working together to get rid of the pregnant Diana.
OzTennis
The Times said the best person to come out of the trilogy in the report was Henri Paul, the driver. He was the semi-drunken Fayed employee who crashed the car at 100 mph, trying to escape the pappasomething at Dodi and Di's behest. He was told he wasn't required for the rest of the night and after having a few drinks with his mates Dodi rang him up and said you are driving us somewhere. Di didn't wear a seatbelt too so as to not spoil her lovely outfit (sorry, damage her supposedly unborn child).
So basically it was MI5, Prince Phillip and the CIA working together to get rid of the pregnant Diana.
OzTennis
#67
Re: Diana - an accident, not a conspiracy
Originally Posted by wheatsheaf42
The only answer I can think of is that Mohammed al Fayed puts a lot of business through the Express.
OzTennis
#68
Re: Diana - an accident, not a conspiracy
Originally Posted by OzTennis
I also prefer to think that with the rapidly declining circulation figures of the DE they came up with a strategy of cutting their price and going on and on and on about Princess Di - there's enough people out there who want to read this type of thing. Fayed has not come to terms with the fact that it was an accident and was his semi-drunken employee who killed them and here's the important bit - he would get his way into royalty through his son. Buying Fulham and owning Harrod's was not enough to give him the recognition and 'celebrity' he desired (also a way of thumbing the nose at all those years of the government refusing him citizenship).
OzTennis
OzTennis
But hey, why let facts and truth get in the way of a good story .... again
#69
Re: Diana - an accident, not a conspiracy
Originally Posted by moneypen20
You forgot to add that he didn't realise it was just a summer fling and she wouldn't have married him in a month of sundays.
But hey, why let facts and truth get in the way of a good story .... again
But hey, why let facts and truth get in the way of a good story .... again
OzTennis
#70
Re: Diana - an accident, not a conspiracy
Originally Posted by OzTennis
True, she also had winter flings, autumn flings ...... butler flings, security guard flings, officer flings (who does Harry remind me of again?) .......... and it was all because of that evil Charles who was forced to marry her by that evil Philip.................
OzTennis
OzTennis
I really like Philip He reminds me of my dad
#71
Re: Diana - an accident, not a conspiracy
Originally Posted by moneypen20
Oh god don't start on the Harry parentage thing - I don't think I could cope I think it's fairly obvious (well it is to me anyway) that he is sooo Charles's lad but rumours will always be there.
I really like Philip He reminds me of my dad
I really like Philip He reminds me of my dad
OzTennis
#72
Re: Diana - an accident, not a conspiracy
Originally Posted by OzTennis
Did he also warn Brits not to stay in China too long or they would end up with 'slitty eyes'.
OzTennis
OzTennis
#73
Re: Diana - an accident, not a conspiracy
Originally Posted by moneypen20
He would have done given half a chance
OzTennis
#74
Fighting my corner
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 11,948
Re: Diana - an accident, not a conspiracy
Originally Posted by jond
Please, is this coming from someone from the Continent that style forgot.
I have never seen such poor interior design in my life until we started looking at houses for sale over here
John
I have never seen such poor interior design in my life until we started looking at houses for sale over here
John
And lead you through the streets of Walsall!
I'll show you something
That will make you change your mind...
#75
Fighting my corner
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 11,948
Re: Diana - an accident, not a conspiracy
Originally Posted by moneypen20
You forgot to add that he didn't realise it was just a summer fling and she wouldn't have married him in a month of sundays.
But hey, why let facts and truth get in the way of a good story .... again
But hey, why let facts and truth get in the way of a good story .... again