Sneaky unsporting Bastards
#16
Just got a $200 fine and 3 points for doing 114 kph on the Gateway motorway.
I don't mind the fine or the points 'cos it was a fair cop.
What I do mind is that the camera was in a vehicle which looked like a workman's ute, complete with yellow light on top.
It was not the usual speed camera van or even one of the Nissan Patrols that they sometimes use.
Be warned......
G

I don't mind the fine or the points 'cos it was a fair cop.
What I do mind is that the camera was in a vehicle which looked like a workman's ute, complete with yellow light on top.
It was not the usual speed camera van or even one of the Nissan Patrols that they sometimes use.
Be warned......
G
You sound as if you would like our soldiers to go back to wearing bright red uniforms in battle so the enemy can clearly see where they are.
I object to the government setting arbitrary speed limits and using them as revenue raisers rather than safety measures (what on earth is the justification for the 100kph limit between Caloundra and Sunshine Motorway on the Bruce, or the 3 different limits on the ICB?) but I don't think it's "unsporting" for them to police these limits in any way they choose.
#17
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,867
From: north east england to south east queensland(cleveland in fact )WE WON THE CUP











Just got a $200 fine and 3 points for doing 114 kph on the Gateway motorway.
I don't mind the fine or the points 'cos it was a fair cop.
What I do mind is that the camera was in a vehicle which looked like a workman's ute, complete with yellow light on top.
It was not the usual speed camera van or even one of the Nissan Patrols that they sometimes use.
Be warned......
G

I don't mind the fine or the points 'cos it was a fair cop.
What I do mind is that the camera was in a vehicle which looked like a workman's ute, complete with yellow light on top.
It was not the usual speed camera van or even one of the Nissan Patrols that they sometimes use.
Be warned......
G
#18
Got to say this is one area where back in Blighty is better. They have got rid of most of the cameras now after it was proved that they were not a benefit to safety.
Dont know about QLD, but in WA the driving is appaling but never see a police car. Just cameras which dont pick up the tail gating and things
Dont know about QLD, but in WA the driving is appaling but never see a police car. Just cameras which dont pick up the tail gating and things
#19
Just Joined

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 22

When i saw the headline for this post I thought it was going to be about the Australians at the Commonwealth games, however, it is my belief that every K over is a killer, myself and family are regular users of this road, please in future slow down and stick to the speed limit,if not for your own safety, then for other road users
Cheers
Cheers
#20
Thread Starter
Bitter and twisted










Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17,503
From: Upmarket











When i saw the headline for this post I thought it was going to be about the Australians at the Commonwealth games, however, it is my belief that every K over is a killer, myself and family are regular users of this road, please in future slow down and stick to the speed limit,if not for your own safety, then for other road users
Cheers
Cheers
The real issue is that the speed limits are far too low for what is supposed to be a three lane (part 4 lane) motorway.
114 kph is about 70 mph.....hardly what I would call an excessive speed.
This is simply revenue raising.
#21
Just got a $200 fine and 3 points for doing 114 kph on the Gateway motorway.
I don't mind the fine or the points 'cos it was a fair cop.
What I do mind is that the camera was in a vehicle which looked like a workman's ute, complete with yellow light on top.
It was not the usual speed camera van or even one of the Nissan Patrols that they sometimes use.
Be warned......
G

I don't mind the fine or the points 'cos it was a fair cop.
What I do mind is that the camera was in a vehicle which looked like a workman's ute, complete with yellow light on top.
It was not the usual speed camera van or even one of the Nissan Patrols that they sometimes use.
Be warned......
G
#22
Account Closed



Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 199











Quite honestly, and I know I'm going to get shot down in flames for this, but I wished there were more unmarked speed cameras on our roads as well as unmarked police vehicles and that the penalties were a lot higher, then maybe, just maybe, some of the idiots on our roads will be caught. The speed limits are there for a reason and if just one fatality can be prevented, then its been worth it! I witnessed a near fataility on the M1 on the Gold Coast a few weeks ago. One idiot motorcylist, who almost killed himself, almost took innocent victims with him as a result.
I wager in the majority of cases all people know this, it's just a bad habit that we are all susceptible to.
Wait until it's your son/daughter who gets knocked down by a speeding driver, people soon change there tune pretty damn fast. All this moaning about revenue increasing is just a plain bogus excuse.
#23
If you use that road regularly then you will know that over 90% of the drivers on there exceed the speed limit.
The real issue is that the speed limits are far too low for what is supposed to be a three lane (part 4 lane) motorway.
114 kph is about 70 mph.....hardly what I would call an excessive speed.
This is simply revenue raising.
The real issue is that the speed limits are far too low for what is supposed to be a three lane (part 4 lane) motorway.
114 kph is about 70 mph.....hardly what I would call an excessive speed.
This is simply revenue raising.
The chances of being killed by a car is much higher in a residential area than a motorway that's why the speed limits are lower in residential areas.
I can't see what difference a few K over the limit will do on a motorway if there is an accident, besides 114 is nothing I just got overtaken on the Bruce (single lane) doing a 140 and on that stretch of road I have never once seen a camera or highway patrol car.
#24
Account Closed



Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 199











Yeah how often do you see speed cameras around residential streets where kids are playing or riding bikes?
The chances of being killed by a car is much higher in a residential area than a motorway that's why the speed limits are lower in residential areas.
I can't see what difference a few K over the limit will do on a motorway if there is an accident, besides 114 is nothing I just got overtaken on the Bruce (single lane) doing a 140 and on that stretch of road I have never once seen a camera or highway patrol car.
The chances of being killed by a car is much higher in a residential area than a motorway that's why the speed limits are lower in residential areas.
I can't see what difference a few K over the limit will do on a motorway if there is an accident, besides 114 is nothing I just got overtaken on the Bruce (single lane) doing a 140 and on that stretch of road I have never once seen a camera or highway patrol car.
Your 140 example takes an extra 370 feet to stop.
#25
Yeah how often do you see speed cameras around residential streets where kids are playing or riding bikes?
The chances of being killed by a car is much higher in a residential area than a motorway that's why the speed limits are lower in residential areas.
I can't see what difference a few K over the limit will do on a motorway if there is an accident, besides 114 is nothing I just got overtaken on the Bruce (single lane) doing a 140 and on that stretch of road I have never once seen a camera or highway patrol car.
The chances of being killed by a car is much higher in a residential area than a motorway that's why the speed limits are lower in residential areas.
I can't see what difference a few K over the limit will do on a motorway if there is an accident, besides 114 is nothing I just got overtaken on the Bruce (single lane) doing a 140 and on that stretch of road I have never once seen a camera or highway patrol car.
Last edited by sassie; Oct 10th 2010 at 8:12 am.
#26
Account Closed


Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 68

Have you ever been to Germany or Switzerland?
Both are "speeding hells", although the German's normally don't have any speed limits on their highways they enforce there regulations with loooottttsss of stealth cars (most police stealth cars are stuffed with tons of different speeding cameras...They can get you while standing, while moving and even when they are driving on the opposite direction)...
The swiss combine this with horrible fees (2000AUD for 10km/h to fast are no problem)
And, to be honest? I find it not that bad. They have far less traffic vicitims than australia if you count it per inhabitant.
Both are "speeding hells", although the German's normally don't have any speed limits on their highways they enforce there regulations with loooottttsss of stealth cars (most police stealth cars are stuffed with tons of different speeding cameras...They can get you while standing, while moving and even when they are driving on the opposite direction)...
The swiss combine this with horrible fees (2000AUD for 10km/h to fast are no problem)
And, to be honest? I find it not that bad. They have far less traffic vicitims than australia if you count it per inhabitant.
#27
I was not the one that was doing the overtaking. The point I was trying to make was that speed cameras are usually only placed in areas where they will raise revenue not save life's!
#29
It's the same with car parking charges. The council don't care about parking congestion, all they care about is revenue.
#30
...giving optimism a go?!







Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,202
From: Brisbane (leafy, hilly western suburbs)











Also consider the stess of driving at a artificially slow speed. It takes constant focus to remain at Australian 'snail pace' speeds on the road. This focus detracts from the important business of paying attention to the road conditions and traffic around you. If driving at a 'natural' speed allows people to concentrate more on their surroundings then safety will be improved.
Is rigidly following the speed limit so important that a driver has to risk others lives to ensure compliance?

(OK - I'll admit the above point may be laboured somewhat - but as a particularly 'vulnerable' road user I spend my life dodging poor attentive drivers on the roads and cursing dangerous driving practices as I take evasive action to maintain my status as an 'alive' person - Many of th drivers I dodge are religiously sticking to the speed limit as they drift mindlessly across lanes, through red lights and generally into my 'death zone'. I have almost NEVER been threatened by a driver exceeding the speed limit.)
Last edited by DadAgain; Oct 10th 2010 at 11:23 am.



