Wikiposts

Carbon tax

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 10th 2011 | 11:48 pm
  #106  
Rambi's Avatar
Rhino with a big horn!
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,117
Rambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by chris955
But that makes no sense, it has to be based on a per capita formula, it makes absolutely no difference how big the country is if each person produces a huge amount of C02.
Per person doesn't make sense either. Australia is not the biggest polluter on the planet. The UK pumps out more pollution than Aus.

If Aus became carbon neutral tomorrow it would make a difference quite close to zilch.
 
Old Jul 10th 2011 | 11:53 pm
  #107  
Rambi's Avatar
Rhino with a big horn!
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,117
Rambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by Wol
Read what you said:

>>Why not? We are talking about a world problem and possibly the end of the world as we know it. Australia is a very large land mass with few people so it's contribution to world "global warming" is small. Surely the countries that produce the CO2 should be the ones that need to change. Australia emits about 1% of world CO2. This is a gnats piss in the ocean compared to the USA and China. China has a very large population so on a per capita basis their emmisions are small, but based on land mass it is hugh. Everyone is ignoring China but whatever we do is dwarfed by what China does.<<

With that logic Antarctica is a big candidate for cutbacks!
I think you got that conclusion back to front.
 
Old Jul 11th 2011 | 12:14 am
  #108  
GarryP's Avatar
snɐןɔ ʎʇıuɐs
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,558
GarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by Rambi
If Aus became carbon neutral tomorrow it would make a difference quite close to zilch.
Not if it stopped exporting brown coal it wouldn't.
 
Old Jul 11th 2011 | 12:22 am
  #109  
Rambi's Avatar
Rhino with a big horn!
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,117
Rambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by GarryP
Not if it stopped exporting brown coal it wouldn't.
Why?
 
Old Jul 11th 2011 | 1:30 am
  #110  
GarryP's Avatar
snɐןɔ ʎʇıuɐs
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,558
GarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by Rambi
Why?
Brown coal is a major CO2/pollutant problem. Its basically one step up from peat. The best way to deal with its significant CO2 issues is to leave the damn stuff in the ground.

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politi...1015-gxou.html
 
Old Jul 11th 2011 | 1:39 am
  #111  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 691
aussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by Wol
Well?
This article sums it up for me:

http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/2788496.html
 
Old Jul 11th 2011 | 1:44 am
  #112  
Rambi's Avatar
Rhino with a big horn!
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,117
Rambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond reputeRambi has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by GarryP
Brown coal is a major CO2/pollutant problem. Its basically one step up from peat. The best way to deal with its significant CO2 issues is to leave the damn stuff in the ground.

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politi...1015-gxou.html
I know what brown coal is. I'm not that far from the Latrobe Valley.

What I was asking was why, if Aus went carbon neutral, it wouldn't be if they stopped exporting brown coal? I guess the double negative made the statement ambiguous.

So sidestepping the ambiguity I'll restate my original statement more clearly. IF Australia went carbon neutral in ALL of its activities then it would make near to no difference on the world's carbon output.

China and the US is where the planet will be saved.
 
Old Jul 11th 2011 | 2:01 am
  #113  
GarryP's Avatar
snɐןɔ ʎʇıuɐs
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,558
GarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond reputeGarryP has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by Rambi
So sidestepping the ambiguity I'll restate my original statement more clearly. IF Australia went carbon neutral in ALL of its activities then it would make near to no difference on the world's carbon output.

China and the US is where the planet will be saved.
I'm not convinced they count the exports in the CO2 total for Oz. I agree that cutting the total should mean cutting the exports, but...

While I agree that there are the big polluters that need to stop, part of that is not giving them an excuse by taking action yourself. And frankly, once one of the big polluters gets stopped, the others will fall into line (or get embargoed).

Australia needs to get a clue on efficiency and cutting out waste - anyone currently shivering in one of their "5-star" houses knows that.
 
Old Jul 11th 2011 | 2:02 am
  #114  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 691
aussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by Rambi
I know what brown coal is. I'm not that far from the Latrobe Valley.

What I was asking was why, if Aus went carbon neutral, it wouldn't be if they stopped exporting brown coal? I guess the double negative made the statement ambiguous.

So sidestepping the ambiguity I'll restate my original statement more clearly. IF Australia went carbon neutral in ALL of its activities then it would make near to no difference on the world's carbon output.

China and the US is where the planet will be saved.
Don't forget India, they are a sleeping giant wanting to ramp up production significantly. Also places like Brazil - cutting down the Amazon is contributing significantly to the problem (assuming the problem is as big as some scientists advocate)

But China's (no matter what the ALP and the Greens claim) output of carbon dioxide is predicted to ramp up astromically year after year for the forseeable future; so the idea that the carbon tax will "save" the planet and "save" teh Great Barrier Reef is nothing more than pure propaganda (and of course a scare campaign to get support for the scheme)
 
Old Jul 11th 2011 | 2:06 am
  #115  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 691
aussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by GarryP
I'm not convinced they count the exports in the CO2 total for Oz. I agree that cutting the total should mean cutting the exports, but...

While I agree that there are the big polluters that need to stop, part of that is not giving them an excuse by taking action yourself. And frankly, once one of the big polluters gets stopped, the others will fall into line (or get embargoed).

Australia needs to get a clue on efficiency and cutting out waste - anyone currently shivering in one of their "5-star" houses knows that.
They do count it. In actual terms Australia's energy sector has become incredibly more efficient than it was 20 years ago; all those horrible power plants being closed down in China currently (to be replaced by more efficient but much bigger ones) are the ones Australia closed down decades ago. Our cars have to be very clean etc etc. Its the fact that we export cheap energy sources to developing countries that contribute so much to our total.
 
Old Jul 11th 2011 | 2:08 am
  #116  
Bix's Avatar
Bix
da Bonehead
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 22,767
From: Lion in da jungle
Bix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

From the 2008 emissions table the top 5 account for 57% of CO2 but the top 2 alone are 41%.

1 China 23.33%
2 USA 18.11%

3 India 5.78%
4 Russia 5.67%
5 Japan 4.01%


for interest:
9 UK 1.73%
16 Aus 1.32%
 
Old Jul 11th 2011 | 2:30 am
  #117  
keel's Avatar
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 972
From: Northumberland to Maida Vale Perth
keel has a reputation beyond reputekeel has a reputation beyond reputekeel has a reputation beyond reputekeel has a reputation beyond reputekeel has a reputation beyond reputekeel has a reputation beyond reputekeel has a reputation beyond reputekeel has a reputation beyond reputekeel has a reputation beyond reputekeel has a reputation beyond reputekeel has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by aussietobe
The point is we have no coice over what type of energy we consume, my understanding is that reneweable energy suitable for base load power generation is DECADES away.....
The easiest way to do it is go nuclear.

After all that who-har about the Japanese Nuclear plant a couple of months How many people died? Not a lot, and it does not emmit CO2.

Keel
 
Old Jul 11th 2011 | 2:34 am
  #118  
keel's Avatar
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 972
From: Northumberland to Maida Vale Perth
keel has a reputation beyond reputekeel has a reputation beyond reputekeel has a reputation beyond reputekeel has a reputation beyond reputekeel has a reputation beyond reputekeel has a reputation beyond reputekeel has a reputation beyond reputekeel has a reputation beyond reputekeel has a reputation beyond reputekeel has a reputation beyond reputekeel has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by EvannTel
Bob Brown seems quite keen.
And he's keen on boys bottoms. They don't call him Bob the brown hatter for nothing.

Keel
 
Old Jul 11th 2011 | 2:40 am
  #119  
Devil's Advocate
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,269
From: Mandurah
EvannTel has a reputation beyond reputeEvannTel has a reputation beyond reputeEvannTel has a reputation beyond reputeEvannTel has a reputation beyond reputeEvannTel has a reputation beyond reputeEvannTel has a reputation beyond reputeEvannTel has a reputation beyond reputeEvannTel has a reputation beyond reputeEvannTel has a reputation beyond reputeEvannTel has a reputation beyond reputeEvannTel has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by keel
The easiest way to do it is go nuclear.

After all that who-har about the Japanese Nuclear plant a couple of months How many people died? Not a lot, and it does not emmit CO2.

Keel
I tend to agree but please remember nuclear is mind numbingly expensive.
 
Old Jul 11th 2011 | 4:09 am
  #120  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 691
aussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond reputeaussietobe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by EvannTel
I tend to agree but please remember nuclear is mind numbingly expensive.
Nuclear energy also explains why the UK and West European nations look good on those carbon tables.
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.