Lack of Clothes - again
#526
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
Ahhh our little shi'te is back.
She brings a whole new meaning to the phrase 'trolly-dolly'.
Probably the only monkey ever to be rejected from the research laboratory.....
She brings a whole new meaning to the phrase 'trolly-dolly'.
Probably the only monkey ever to be rejected from the research laboratory.....
Last edited by Eva; Jun 21st 2012 at 4:44 pm.
#527
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
you are right there are guys here whose minds are filled with pregidous, but you got to remember that this forum is there homeland, and education is the way forward not confrontation. Also to their credit, those lot are some what milder than the expats back in the eighties and nineties, the Thatcher time, at the time when I used to work in Dubai. Those creatures then had the "we are here to teach the pagans civilization" kind of attitude, the time when the catch phrase "sand niggers" was in circulation. So, yes, still plenty of effort is needed to educate
Is that actually a word? Hilarious that it is in the same post professing the need to educate us.
This thread has more trolls than middle earth.
#529
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
It's always the same...when they run out of arguments, they become insulting...predictable and boring. I am waiting for one that actually can keep up without being vulgar and insulting...not holding my breath though.
#533
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
Math, aint you got it yet - most of these regular dingbats on here all tend to close in as soon as someone says something one of them doesn't agree with - typical white trash school playground mentality. It's good to read posts like yours and desert dwellers, challenging these d*ckheads and their blatant 'gang up' mentality - i on the other hand enjoy throwing a grenade here and there and then watching these punk arses getting their kickers in a twist . It kills some time And as for normsk or whatever that mofo's name is - he thinks EVERYONE who doesn't agree with him or his half arsed 'friends' on here are trolls....sad ****.
#534
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
I stopped reading at this point.
You say it's a pathetic level to just insult someone yet you then, immediately address Lullabelle as 'love'....given the context of this whole discussion, you've just tried waving red rags but actually, made yourself look like even more of a fool.
You say it's a pathetic level to just insult someone yet you then, immediately address Lullabelle as 'love'....given the context of this whole discussion, you've just tried waving red rags but actually, made yourself look like even more of a fool.
Using the word "love" in a demeaning and patronising fashion as a means to win an argument which is essentially about man's need to control women....
#535
Banned
Joined: May 2012
Location: The Valleys
Posts: 59
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
the literal word that I was on about is prejudice ( overlooked by the stupid spell checker on this site), However, the practicle meaning that I wanted to convey is vivedly demonstrated by this lovely lady in this video (I have put this video on other threads because a picture is worth a thousand words)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DI_iO...ture=fvwp&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DI_iO...ture=fvwp&NR=1
#536
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: Dubai, working at Dust World Central
Posts: 3,706
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
Wow! Spelling isn't really your strong point. Practical and vividly. Oh and as for the 'stupid' spell checker, think who is the stupid one habibi.
#537
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
If one has to resort to name calling and swearing in a debate, then they have already lost the argument
Disagree by all means, but do so in a more respectful manner.
Thanks
Disagree by all means, but do so in a more respectful manner.
Thanks
#538
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
the literal word that I was on about is prejudice ( overlooked by the stupid spell checker on this site), However, the practicle meaning that I wanted to convey is vivedly demonstrated by this lovely lady in this video (I have put this video on other threads because a picture is worth a thousand words)
[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DI_iOIw_EN4&feature=fvwp&NR=1
[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DI_iOIw_EN4&feature=fvwp&NR=1
#539
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: Dubai, working at Dust World Central
Posts: 3,706
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
"A secretary who hurled racist abuse at fellow passengers on a Tube train while drunk had brought shame to Britain, a judge said yesterday.
Jacqueline Woodhouse, 42, was jailed for 21 weeks for her foul-mouthed tirade. She snarled at shocked commuters seated beside her: ‘I used to live in England and now I live in the United Nations.
At Westminster Magistrates’ Court, the judge also gave Woodhouse an anti-social behaviour order banning her from travelling on the Underground or the Docklands Light Railway while drunk for five years after it emerged that she had been fined for a similar rant on the DLR in 2008.
District Judge Michael Snow said of the video clip capturing her latest outburst: ‘Anyone viewing that would feel a deep sense of shame that our fellow citizens could be subject to such behaviour.’"
ROFL Would have K'd you put I need to put myself about a bit.
#540
Banned
Joined: May 2012
Location: The Valleys
Posts: 59
Re: Lack of Clothes - again
May I remind you Habibi that before you become stupid enough to start mocking people's spelling that there are hundreds of thousands of anglo-saxons and millions more world wide who are not good at spelling because of dyslexia!! and that includes Albert Einstein who used to say:
"I cannot write in English, because of the treacherous spelling. When I am reading, I only hear it and am unable to remember what the written word looks like.”,
Assuming, off course, that you have heard of Albert Einstein!!!!
"I cannot write in English, because of the treacherous spelling. When I am reading, I only hear it and am unable to remember what the written word looks like.”,
Assuming, off course, that you have heard of Albert Einstein!!!!