![]() |
Re: Is this really, that terrible compared to UK?
Originally Posted by lansbury
(Post 9128350)
But that isn't "growing old". It is still part of your working life.
The fact that you can get stuck at anytime in your working life without insurance in the US is the problem which needs correcting. The problems that can cause can be at anytime. To say that growing old in the US is a bigger problem than the UK isn't so because once people reach 65 they are not worse off. I speak as someone who moved to the US at 58 to retire, and has found the cost of health care to be affordable and the treatment I have received when needed far exceeding anything I received in my life in the UK. The US excludes people who don't have medical insurance, the UK includes everyone but doesn't charge enough in tax to pay for the NHS so everyone gets crap service. |
Re: Is this really, that terrible compared to UK?
Originally Posted by Desdemona
(Post 9127645)
Like I said before, oldies like my Dad and his generation would have a problem with having their "rights" taken away. They own guns, always have and know how to use them responsibly. My hubby on the other hand has always been a city dweller and would probably agree with you. He's never owned a gun and quite frankly the idea of using one on a burgler would scare him half to death :lol:
What is wrong with getting a medical note to say you are of sound mind, not suffering depression and getting a criminal background check to own a weapon? Sure it'll take more than a few days and be a inconvenience, but isn't that a small price? It's not like buying a coffee machine, yet the whole gun debate seems to equate it to the same significance. It is all very amusing...people here would hate the government stance in Austria if they think people are so over baring on this issue, over there, if you fail your driving test 3 times, you've got to take a medical to prove you are of sound mind because they can't believe anyone could possibly not have issues or be stupid to fail that often. I've seen the theory book, it's 3 inches thick :lol: |
Re: Is this really, that terrible compared to UK?
Originally Posted by nethead
(Post 9128047)
They do that much more in the Oz forum :p
|
Re: Is this really, that terrible compared to UK?
Originally Posted by lansbury
(Post 9128350)
But that isn't "growing old". It is still part of your working life.
The fact that you can get stuck at anytime in your working life without insurance in the US is the problem which needs correcting. The problems that can cause can be at anytime. To say that growing old in the US is a bigger problem than the UK isn't so because once people reach 65 they are not worse off. I speak as someone who moved to the US at 58 to retire, and has found the cost of health care to be affordable and the treatment I have received when needed far exceeding anything I received in my life in the UK. The US excludes people who don't have medical insurance, the UK includes everyone but doesn't charge enough in tax to pay for the NHS so everyone gets crap service. Not just health, but even gun laws. Things can be great in one state, but polar opposite next door. It's very hard for there to be a change and equal comparison if someone were at the top end and thinking they might lose out, compared to someone on the other end of the scale who would have most to gain, etc. |
Re: Is this really, that terrible compared to UK?
Originally Posted by ian-mstm
(Post 9128195)
That's as fair a question as could be asked. I'm sure many people have their own views on what might be considered a right, but to me a right is an abstract concept that is protected both by law and by members of the armed forces.
|
Re: Is this really, that terrible compared to UK?
Originally Posted by ian-mstm
(Post 9128338)
Do you know why? The Supreme Court held that they were not protected under the US Constitution. The 14th Amendment to the Constitution fixed that, fortunately.
As I have maintained throughout in this thread, rights have always been expanded and enumerated.
Originally Posted by ian-mstm
(Post 9128338)
As I have maintained throughout in this thread, rights have always been expanded and enumerated.
|
Re: Is this really, that terrible compared to UK?
Originally Posted by lansbury
(Post 9128350)
The fact that you can get stuck at anytime in your working life without insurance in the US is the problem which needs correcting. The problems that can cause can be at anytime. To say that growing old in the US is a bigger problem than the UK isn't so because once people reach 65 they are not worse off.
Originally Posted by lansbury
(Post 9128350)
The US excludes people who don't have medical insurance, the UK includes everyone but doesn't charge enough in tax to pay for the NHS so everyone gets crap service.
|
Re: Is this really, that terrible compared to UK?
Originally Posted by airways
(Post 9126897)
This forum is polarized into people who love the USA and this who have not had a good time. Unfortunately the balance of posting is from those who had a bad time winging about it and trying to convince others it's all crap and they should leave or not even bother making the move. A lot depends on your circumstances of moving here and where you move to. If my UK employers hadn't closed the data center I was going to manage 2 weeks before our move, I'm sure my experience would have been different and a lot more positive. As it was, I arrived in the US in January 2002 with my wife, 2 cats, a dog and no job. No big deal I thought. I hadn't interviewed for a position in the UK for over 10 years. Companies came to me, not the other way around. I had a good degree from one of the top universities in the UK. But guess what? I found out that UK work experience doesn't count for squat in the US. That's not whinging, it's a fact. My degree in theoretical physics is useless when looking for IT jobs. They'd rather you had a 30 year old computer science degree. I ended up selling cars for over a year just to get some money in. Then, I did land a nice IT job through contacts I had made there (in my experience, the US is all about networking, especially employment wise). Great I thought. A nice network engineering gig at $35 per hour and medical for the family. My paycheck come up at the end of my second week. It was more than a little light. Upshot was that they decided they couldn't afford the $35 an hour so they were paying me $12 an hour and I could like it or lump it. By the way, they back-tracked on the medical too. My options? Leave or sue. No real employment protection here. Just to rub salt on the wound, I found out they were charging a premium to clients for my services because of my knowledge and experience. Nowadays, I'm running my own consulting business. I don't make great money, but it's comfortable. I live in a geographically beautiful part of the world. As others have said, the US is very, very diverse, even within a state. I live in Oregon. To most people, that will bring up a vision of a tree covered, rainy, liberal bastion in the north west. Not if you cross to east of the Cascade mountains where I live. I have a friend here who moved from rural Louisiana. He says this is the most "redneck" place he has ever lived. It's very right wing and xenophobic, not just to foreigners, but to anyone from outside the area. Pretty ironic considering that tourism is the main industry. Why am I here? My wife moved here to be close to an old friend. They no longer talk. Oh joy! So, in summary, my experience is that if you move here with a good job lined up and to a place you feel you fit in, then it could be a good move. Just be aware that it is a foreign country. Things are done differently and attitudes are very, very different. It's a culture shock, no matter how much American TV, films or other culture you drink down. As I said, it's not a case of whinging, it's making people who haven't made the move aware of some of the pitfalls. Would I still move? Yes I would, but only with a decent job and to one of the more cosmopolitan areas. |
Re: Is this really, that terrible compared to UK?
Originally Posted by Giantaxe
(Post 9128506)
You're being obtuse. The court found that there was "a substantive constitutional right to own slaves". How much clearer a right - in US terms - is there?
At any rate, I stand by my assertion... you're welcome to disagree! Ian |
Re: Is this really, that terrible compared to UK?
Originally Posted by ian-mstm
(Post 9128824)
"Substantive" ranks right up there with "virtually". You get virtually spotless dishes with Wow Detergent! People see "virtually spotless" and think "spotless"... but they don't mean the same thing. People see "substantive constitutional right" and they think "constitutional right"... but they don't mean the same thing!
At any rate, I stand by my assertion... you're welcome to disagree! Ian |
Re: Is this really, that terrible compared to UK?
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 9127996)
There is no clique (it's be renamed the community).
|
Re: Is this really, that terrible compared to UK?
Originally Posted by cluedweasel
(Post 9128531)
I live in Oregon. To most people, that will bring up a vision of a tree covered, rainy, liberal bastion in the north west. Not if you cross to east of the Cascade mountains where I live. I have a friend here who moved from rural Louisiana. He says this is the most "redneck" place he has ever lived. It's very right wing and xenophobic, not just to foreigners, but to anyone from outside the area.
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=179479 |
Re: Is this really, that terrible compared to UK?
Originally Posted by HumphreyC
(Post 9130059)
Wow. If someone from rural Louisiana says that your neighbourhood is the most redneck place he has ever been - it must be pretty darn redneck. Can't be worse than Arkansas though (if this thread is anything to go by). Check out the weird Confederate shrine in the photo at the bottom of the page.
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=179479 |
Re: Is this really, that terrible compared to UK?
Originally Posted by nethead
(Post 9130085)
Seriously, maybe apart from the confederate flags, you could take photos like that in any part of the US I've visited.
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4031/...a653c996_o.jpg Most redneck place I've seen so far was in Vermont of all places - I think it was called Searsburg. It was all the more surprising as it comes at you out of the blue after a couple of pristine villages then all of a sudden it's like you have been transplanted to the Ozarks. |
Re: Is this really, that terrible compared to UK?
I think the post 17 on that thread summed it up for me....at least on the states I've been to.
Quote You can find similar trashy scenes in many, if not most, states in the country (including California and Sarah Palin's Alaska). I've seen areas of Hawaii that would totally shock most people. The extent of it varies from state to state, though. From my travels, it's most noticeable in the south, and I don't think that should be a surprise considering the amount of poverty. There are probably people all over the world who would never guess we have such poverty in this country (including cultural poverty). Unquote |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 5:26 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.