Obama's Executive Order
#76
Bloody Yank
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: USA! USA!
Posts: 4,186
Re: Obama's Executive Order
That's about 59 seconds longer than it should have taken to come up with that bit of wisdom of yours.
No, the logistics of deporting 11 million people would be quite costly and difficult, and it wouldn't do any good even if you did.
People are good for GDP. The US is generally better off for having them. The alternative is to become something like Japan, which is sinking under the weight of an aging population and can't escape a semi-permanent recession.
No, the logistics of deporting 11 million people would be quite costly and difficult, and it wouldn't do any good even if you did.
People are good for GDP. The US is generally better off for having them. The alternative is to become something like Japan, which is sinking under the weight of an aging population and can't escape a semi-permanent recession.
#77
Account Closed
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 366
Re: Obama's Executive Order
That's about 59 seconds longer than it should have taken to come up with that bit of wisdom of yours.
No, the logistics of deporting 11 million people would be quite costly and difficult, and it wouldn't do any good even if you did.
People are good for GDP. The US is generally better off for having them. The alternative is to become something like Japan, which is sinking under the weight of an aging population and can't escape a semi-permanent recession.
No, the logistics of deporting 11 million people would be quite costly and difficult, and it wouldn't do any good even if you did.
People are good for GDP. The US is generally better off for having them. The alternative is to become something like Japan, which is sinking under the weight of an aging population and can't escape a semi-permanent recession.
Lets see someone put together a better worded plan that I did. The great Ian- Mstm perhaps .
#78
Re: Obama's Executive Order
Generally yes. Given that GDP is one of the metrics. (My investments for example benefit greatly.)
However it should not be discounted that many demographics are negatively affected.
And there's never enough honest discussion on that issue.
However it should not be discounted that many demographics are negatively affected.
And there's never enough honest discussion on that issue.
#81
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: Obama's Executive Order
There is always the law of uninted consequences. I remember some years back a lady posting that her husband had gone through the waiver process and comeback and could not get his old job back because he wanted to be legal. Was finding it very difficult to get work in his line as it was work Americans did not want to do.
Talking around there is a demand for labour not subject to the usual regulations and I see nothing to suggest that the demand has gone down even if the supply will. If only temporarily.
Talking around there is a demand for labour not subject to the usual regulations and I see nothing to suggest that the demand has gone down even if the supply will. If only temporarily.
#82
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: Obama's Executive Order
After all millions of Americans visit.
There are dodgy places wherever you go. Just have to be aware.
For example I used to go through Calais a lot. Read the media and you should not stop for at least 150 miles. My guess is that most is OK but there are certain bits to avoid.
#84
Bloody Yank
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: USA! USA!
Posts: 4,186
Re: Obama's Executive Order
The cost-benefit analysis favors having immigrants over not having them. Part of the issue is that the costs and benefits are not evenly distributed. The benefits tend to be federal/national in nature, while the costs are unevenly distributed to particular locales that aren't reimbursed accordingly; it doesn't help us to ignore the difference.
#85
Re: Obama's Executive Order
Yes, the term 'net benefit' doesn't give the whole story...
And regarding 'jobs that Americans won't do'.
I believe Americans have done and continue to do some of the most difficult, dangerous, complex jobs in the world. However if there are seasonal requirements that are difficult to fill then visas can be issued.
Perhaps the issue is that the money on offer isn't enough to live on for some of these jobs.
I remember getting a quote for stucco on our house.
One business, licensed, bonded, insured, legal workers. $40,000
Other 'business' unlicensed, illegal workforce etc...$12,000
Healthy competition?
And regarding 'jobs that Americans won't do'.
I believe Americans have done and continue to do some of the most difficult, dangerous, complex jobs in the world. However if there are seasonal requirements that are difficult to fill then visas can be issued.
Perhaps the issue is that the money on offer isn't enough to live on for some of these jobs.
I remember getting a quote for stucco on our house.
One business, licensed, bonded, insured, legal workers. $40,000
Other 'business' unlicensed, illegal workforce etc...$12,000
Healthy competition?
Last edited by Hotscot; Nov 24th 2014 at 1:18 am.
#86
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: Obama's Executive Order
You're right, of course. Still, there's a cost of having a large immigrant population, and a cost of not having one.
The cost-benefit analysis favors having immigrants over not having them. Part of the issue is that the costs and benefits are not evenly distributed. The benefits tend to be federal/national in nature, while the costs are unevenly distributed to particular locales that aren't reimbursed accordingly; it doesn't help us to ignore the difference.
The cost-benefit analysis favors having immigrants over not having them. Part of the issue is that the costs and benefits are not evenly distributed. The benefits tend to be federal/national in nature, while the costs are unevenly distributed to particular locales that aren't reimbursed accordingly; it doesn't help us to ignore the difference.
#87
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 417
Re: Obama's Executive Order
The rule change that was previously proposed would allow H-4s to apply for EADs if the primary has an approved I-140. This is huge for people who had an approved I-140 but weren't able to file I-485s (because of visa number availability), obviously. Do we know if that's still the plan, or are they going to implement some other thing now? Most of the coverage I've seen this morning has been predictably crap on the details.
Finalize a rule to provide work authorization to the spouses of certain H-1B visa holders who are on the path to lawful permanent resident status.
Looks like I should not have jumped to the wrong conclusion. This will only help one of my friends. Shame, I never understood why J2s can work but H4s cannot.
#88
Banned
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Mallorca
Posts: 19,367
Re: Obama's Executive Order
There's a big difference between these two headlines:
Exploitation facilitates illegal immigration
and
Illegal immigration facilitates exploitation
Exploitation facilitates illegal immigration
and
Illegal immigration facilitates exploitation
#89
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 41,518
Re: Obama's Executive Order
Yes, the term 'net benefit' doesn't give the whole story...
And regarding 'jobs that Americans won't do'.
I believe Americans have done and continue to do some of the most difficult, dangerous, complex jobs in the world. However if there are seasonal requirements that are difficult to fill then visas can be issued.
Perhaps the issue is that the money on offer isn't enough to live on for some of these jobs.
I remember getting a quote for stucco on our house.
One business, licensed, bonded, insured, legal workers. $40,000
Other 'business' unlicensed, illegal workforce etc...$12,000
Healthy competition?
And regarding 'jobs that Americans won't do'.
I believe Americans have done and continue to do some of the most difficult, dangerous, complex jobs in the world. However if there are seasonal requirements that are difficult to fill then visas can be issued.
Perhaps the issue is that the money on offer isn't enough to live on for some of these jobs.
I remember getting a quote for stucco on our house.
One business, licensed, bonded, insured, legal workers. $40,000
Other 'business' unlicensed, illegal workforce etc...$12,000
Healthy competition?